HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Montreal Canadiens
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Bournival

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-14-2013, 01:13 AM
  #1
sammy d
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 657
vCash: 500
Bournival

Seems like he's our Golden Boy this year. Last year was Dumont, year before was Leblanc, year before Palushaj, year before Latendresse. My point is don't get too excited. Bournival is another one of our tweeners, not an offensive guy, not big enough to play a real physical game. Where does he really fit?

sammy d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 01:16 AM
  #2
Draft
Registered User
 
Draft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,191
vCash: 500
He fits on the third line going into the future because of his two-way skills, his size, his physical ability, his attitude, and his name.

I like him and I expect him to do better than most of the players before him if he's put in the right situation. He's got a pretty high-end work ethic, I think that's what will make him stick.

Draft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 01:27 AM
  #3
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 7,610
vCash: 500
I deserve to eat crow for my prior skepticism regarding Bournival.

He is an effective player.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 01:49 AM
  #4
Madam Kadri
Fight, Troll, Score
 
Madam Kadri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland native
Country: United States
Posts: 7,119
vCash: 500
5' 11", 192 lbs is a giant compared to the rest of our smurf forwards.

And his speed his unreal.

Dumont never impressed me very much. Nor did Leblanc, he was merely solid. Palushaj was ****ING HOT GARBAGE with us.

Madam Kadri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 01:53 AM
  #5
Madam Kadri
Fight, Troll, Score
 
Madam Kadri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland native
Country: United States
Posts: 7,119
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draft View Post
He fits on the third line going into the future because of his two-way skills, his size, his physical ability, his attitude, and his name.

I like him and I expect him to do better than most of the players before him if he's put in the right situation. He's got a pretty high-end work ethic, I think that's what will make him stick.
If anything, he's a poor man's Michael Frolik. Got tons of speed to wreck "defensive havoc" on the opponent.

Madam Kadri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 02:00 AM
  #6
Draft
Registered User
 
Draft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prallchengher View Post
If anything, he's a poor man's Michael Frolik. Got tons of speed to wreck "defensive havoc" on the opponent.
Yeah, that seem like a pretty reasonable physical comparison. However, Frolik is much more adept offensively and Bournival plays a very simple north-south type of game.

To me, he's in between Dan Cleary and Max Talbot.

Draft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 02:17 AM
  #7
Hackett
HF Needs Feeny
 
Hackett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,929
vCash: 500
Bournival should have a lengthy nhl career. Only question is whether he will be top 6 or top 9 player.

Hackett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 02:54 AM
  #8
Jeffrey
Registered User
 
Jeffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,888
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Jeffrey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackett View Post
Bournival should have a lengthy nhl career. Only question is whether he will be top 6 or top 9 player.
I'm a huge Bournival but I don't expect any unreal offensive from him. I still think he could learn more by playing in the AHL.

I think he has the potential of a Chris Higgins (which is not a bad thing). Any team that want to compete for the cup need a solid bottom 6. I think he would be part of that for us in the long run.

Jeffrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 03:08 AM
  #9
StellerEller
Saku :D
 
StellerEller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hamilton, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,760
vCash: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prallchengher View Post
5' 11", 192 lbs is a giant compared to the rest of our smurf forwards.

And his speed his unreal.

Dumont never impressed me very much. Nor did Leblanc, he was merely solid. Palushaj was ****ING HOT GARBAGE with us.
He looks like a lock to be not only a regular NHLer, but a great 3rd liner.

As you said his speed is fantastic, and his good fitness, motor and strong hockey IQ will make him a key component on the third line behind Galchenyuk and Eller in the future.

StellerEller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 03:30 AM
  #10
keepcalmandbeninja
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,094
vCash: 500
I know I will get a few jokes for this but the fact of the matter is Bournival has achieved what he has achieved thus far because of his virtues...because of his character.

I do appreciate sammy d you throwing caution to the wind but Bournival's emotional/psychological maturity seems quite advanced (past and present) in comparison to all the names you listed...

As for where he fits? A hockey player's potential and form is not written in stone...they are the architects of their success or failure...

keepcalmandbeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 03:45 AM
  #11
rockjngo
Registered User
 
rockjngo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,291
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy d View Post
Seems like he's our Golden Boy this year. Last year was Dumont, year before was Leblanc, year before Palushaj, year before Latendresse. My point is don't get too excited. Bournival is another one of our tweeners, not an offensive guy, not big enough to play a real physical game. Where does he really fit?
sammy my boy, Bournival is 6'0" but he's really thick and has low center of gravity. just because you're 6'7 doesn't mean you're strong on skates, and Bournival is strong on skates. He has tremendous speed, dare I say faster than Pacioretty. Bournival has leadership as he was captain of two junior club and minor club. This guy may not put up 50 points but he's a coache's player, very reliable. Can play in all situations. Someone compared him to a young Max Talbot which is accurate but less vocal. He's exactly what you need on a winning team, soldiers like Prust, Bournival.

-Bournival has advantages over Dumont due to his size, speed and harder to knock off the puck.
-Bournival has advantages over Leblanc because he's faster and is a good two way player, if Leblanc can't score, he's useless to the club cuz he's not physical
-Palushaj was similar to Leblanc, he couldn't crack top 6, and can't play bottom 6.
-Latendresse is very slow, the game is faster and lats can't skate.

rockjngo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 04:18 AM
  #12
ashtraygirl
Registered User
 
ashtraygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Montreal
Country: Scotland
Posts: 350
vCash: 500
His speed makes him really effective on the forecheck. I'd be happy with him becoming a staple on our 3rd line in a year or two.

ashtraygirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 07:07 AM
  #13
CanadienShark
Registered User
 
CanadienShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,745
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockjngo View Post
sammy my boy, Bournival is 6'0" but he's really thick and has low center of gravity. just because you're 6'7 doesn't mean you're strong on skates, and Bournival is strong on skates. He has tremendous speed, dare I say faster than Pacioretty. Bournival has leadership as he was captain of two junior club and minor club. This guy may not put up 50 points but he's a coache's player, very reliable. Can play in all situations. Someone compared him to a young Max Talbot which is accurate but less vocal. He's exactly what you need on a winning team, soldiers like Prust, Bournival.

-Bournival has advantages over Dumont due to his size, speed and harder to knock off the puck.
-Bournival has advantages over Leblanc because he's faster and is a good two way player, if Leblanc can't score, he's useless to the club cuz he's not physical
-Palushaj was similar to Leblanc, he couldn't crack top 6, and can't play bottom 6.
-Latendresse is very slow, the game is faster and lats can't skate.
You're right on most parts, but totally wrong about Leblanc imo. He's a really smart player who could be a very effective checker on the 3rd line.

CanadienShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 08:12 AM
  #14
Craig71
Registered User
 
Craig71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,142
vCash: 500
Bournival does not look like a rookie and thats a key element to look for in a player, I remember hearing Hrudey say how many faceoffs he won in his own end and how they outplayed Vancouvers second line and that was the case for the whole night. He is a keeper and sure he will make mistakes but like others have mentioned, his speed is unreal and it will get him out of trouble when he needs it too. If he turns into Chris Higgins that would be awesome because Higgins should have never been traded and we have missed his ability ever since he was sent packing.

Craig71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 08:17 AM
  #15
Craig71
Registered User
 
Craig71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,142
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadienShark View Post
You're right on most parts, but totally wrong about Leblanc imo. He's a really smart player who could be a very effective checker on the 3rd line.
It takes some players longer than others to put it all together and Leblanc may be one of them. I think he can be the second coming of Carbonneau but he really needs to get stronger and bigger and prove himself this year in Hamilton or his days with this organization at least might be over.

Craig71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 08:42 AM
  #16
Monctonscout
Monctonscout
 
Monctonscout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 31,437
vCash: 500
Once Parros is back I wouldn't be surprised if he is sent down for more ice time. He needs to play bigger minutes on the top 2 lines this year.

Monctonscout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 08:58 AM
  #17
FrankMTL
Registered User
 
FrankMTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,753
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey View Post
I'm a huge Bournival but I don't expect any unreal offensive from him. I still think he could learn more by playing in the AHL.

I think he has the potential of a Chris Higgins (which is not a bad thing). Any team that want to compete for the cup need a solid bottom 6. I think he would be part of that for us in the long run.
I like that comparison Jeffrey

FrankMTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 09:40 AM
  #18
Hugo Sham
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 10,302
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMTL View Post
I like that comparison Jeffrey
me too but i'm not sure he has Higgins - hands - i know that's not saying much. lol. but higgy was 20 goal scorer for a few years.
he might also be grittier than higgins

Hugo Sham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 10:33 AM
  #19
theboss*
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,696
vCash: 500
He's better than dd that is for sure

theboss* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 10:41 AM
  #20
#57
Registered User
 
#57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,885
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy d View Post
Seems like he's our Golden Boy this year. Last year was Dumont, year before was Leblanc, year before Palushaj, year before Latendresse. My point is don't get too excited. Bournival is another one of our tweeners, not an offensive guy, not big enough to play a real physical game. Where does he really fit?
Dumont could be an affective 4th line sparkplug for us down the road. You need an effective 4th line to win the cup - anyway look how popular Parros and Prust have quickly become with the fanbase. Bournival should be a solid 3rd or 4th line guy for us. One player you did not name is Lapierre, who I would kill to have back on the team, he's better than Moen & White at least.

I see Leblanc as still making the NHL one day, he had some great stretch with us and if he regains his confidence at the AHL level he will be fine. Unfortunately I do not trust the coach down there, so perhaps Leblanc will be wasted.

#57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 10:47 AM
  #21
WeThreeKings
DJ Nikita
 
WeThreeKings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 38,019
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to WeThreeKings
Bournival will be an effective bottom 6 forward. He has the hockey IQ, offensive and defensive awareness plus raw speed to be an effective player. I don't expect more than 10-15 goals.. 30-40 points in his better seasons, but his speed will help our PK and it will help our forecheck. He won't cost us in the defensive zone, a very useful player.

WeThreeKings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 10:55 AM
  #22
canadiensnation
Go Habs Go
 
canadiensnation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: GTA
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,350
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monctonscout View Post
Once Parros is back I wouldn't be surprised if he is sent down for more ice time. He needs to play bigger minutes on the top 2 lines this year.
Depends how he plays maybe just play Parros vs Tor,Bos,Ott,Buf and a couple of west teams. I cant see Parros playing 70+ games.

canadiensnation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 11:09 AM
  #23
StellerEller
Saku :D
 
StellerEller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hamilton, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,760
vCash: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadiensnation View Post
Depends how he plays maybe just play Parros vs Tor,Bos,Ott,Buf and a couple of west teams. I cant see Parros playing 70+ games.
I dunno he is actually a dwcent hockey player. He doesnt really take bad penalties and can cycle well. That being said I think id want both parros and bournival in at the same time (with white out)

StellerEller is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 11:12 AM
  #24
Et le But
Moderator
 
Et le But's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New York
Country: Argentina
Posts: 18,027
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeThreeKings View Post
Bournival will be an effective bottom 6 forward. He has the hockey IQ, offensive and defensive awareness plus raw speed to be an effective player. I don't expect more than 10-15 goals.. 30-40 points in his better seasons, but his speed will help our PK and it will help our forecheck. He won't cost us in the defensive zone, a very useful player.
I looks like a really nice 3rd liner to me. Will never wow people with his stats but he seems to know how to get things done. Really smart player to go along with speed and an insane work ethic.

Et le But is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
10-14-2013, 11:14 AM
  #25
pine*
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Montréal
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,340
vCash: 500
He is a player that gets it, that's for sure. Always plays with an active stick. A fine young man.

pine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.