HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

LA Kings at New York Rangers 11-17-13

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-17-2013, 11:14 PM
  #176
h0ckeyman
Registered User
 
h0ckeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 2,097
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
I know that one game shouldn't take away from 10 really solid games, but I was so high on this damn team for how well they've been playing. Outside of some really good defense in the first period and Lundqvist being lights out, NONE of that was there. I don't know if I'd say we got dominated, but if we didn't it was awfully close. Just did nothing well. Is this what will happen when we play a big defensive team like the Kings? What happened to the skill I saw this team have? Nothing was there. Looked like a Torts game. So disappointing.
37 shots on goal. They just didn't go tonight. I think you should watch the game again.

h0ckeyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:15 PM
  #177
NYRFAN218
Mac Truck
 
NYRFAN218's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by azaloum90 View Post
seriously though...

"Call on the ice is confirmed, no goal"...

Yet the ref is signaling a goal on the ice... WTF
He waved it off as he was skating towards the scorekeepers table for the review.

__________________
http://hfboards.com/image.php?u=53946&type=sigpic&dateline=1320361610
NYRFAN218 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:15 PM
  #178
SnowblindNYR
Registered User
 
SnowblindNYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17,263
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by moore is new mac View Post
the reason why we beat L.A. last time was that Nash was very dominant against them.. no nash= no game breaker
Wasn't just him. The whole team took it to them. The Kings played poorly though.

SnowblindNYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:17 PM
  #179
SnowblindNYR
Registered User
 
SnowblindNYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17,263
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ckeyman View Post
37 shots on goal. They just didn't go tonight. I think you should watch the game again.
I don't know why people bring up the shots. Do you realize that a tic tac toe deflection in front of the net and an unscreened shot from the point are both shots. We had a lot of the latter, they had chances closer to the former. Incredibly disappointing.

SnowblindNYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:19 PM
  #180
SnowblindNYR
Registered User
 
SnowblindNYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17,263
vCash: 500
BTW, we played really well against the Devils and Habs, but 3 goals in the last 3 games, that's terrible. Nash can't get back soon enough.

SnowblindNYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:19 PM
  #181
h0ckeyman
Registered User
 
h0ckeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 2,097
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
I don't know why people bring up the shots. Do you realize that a tic tac toe deflection in front of the net and an unscreened shot from the point are both shots. We had a lot of the latter, they had chances closer to the former. Incredibly disappointing.
Agreed that they didn't have the quantity of nice chances that we are used to seeing, but LA is a tough team to play against. Every inch of the ice is extremely competetive. You don't get lots of great inside chances against a team like this. That being said, 37 shots is 37 shots, and while it wasnt a pretty game, you cant completely dismiss the shot count either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
BTW, we played really well against the Devils and Habs, but 3 goals in the last 3 games, that's terrible. Nash can't get back soon enough.
Ive been racking my brain all day, who do you demote from the top 6? Kreider, Zucc, Step, Cally, Hags or Richy?

h0ckeyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:23 PM
  #182
SnowblindNYR
Registered User
 
SnowblindNYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17,263
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ckeyman View Post
Agreed that they didn't have the quantity of nice chances that we are used to seeing, but LA is a tough team to play against. Every inch of the ice is extremely competetive. You don't get lots of great inside chances against a team like this. That being said, 37 shots is 37 shots, and while it wasnt a pretty game, you cant completely dismiss the shot count either.



Ive been racking my brain all day, who do you demote from the top 6? Kreider, Zucc, Step, Cally, Hags or Richy?
Cally. Nash has played well with Hagelin. No one from the Stepan line though. That Richards like hasn't been very good lately.

SnowblindNYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:24 PM
  #183
SnowblindNYR
Registered User
 
SnowblindNYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17,263
vCash: 500
BTW, I saw the highlights of this game it was confirmed how badly we got outplayed. We weren't under siege the whole game, but they had a lot of EXCELLENT chances. GRADE FRIGGIN A. We got absolutely nothing.

SnowblindNYR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-17-2013, 11:31 PM
  #184
h0ckeyman
Registered User
 
h0ckeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 2,097
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
Cally. Nash has played well with Hagelin. No one from the Stepan line though. That Richards like hasn't been very good lately.
I guess you're right but I don't know if I like it

h0ckeyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 12:18 AM
  #185
GFiP
Registered User
 
GFiP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,633
vCash: 500
Just saw the replay of the Moore no-goal. At MSG they didn't show that angle. In fact they showed some pretty terrible angles.

GFiP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 12:22 AM
  #186
Glennsoe
Horndog
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Norway
Posts: 4,049
vCash: 500
1 goal for and 1 goal against the last 2 games is both good and scary..

Glennsoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 12:37 AM
  #187
Omni Owl
Registered User
 
Omni Owl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,199
vCash: 500
Lundy is an amazing goalie, it was an enjoyable game tonight because I feel like our cities have a great connection that spans all of humanity.

Omni Owl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 12:51 AM
  #188
TigerJack
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country:
Posts: 846
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idlerlee View Post
Will easily be remembered as his biggest mistake in a Rangers jersey
If so, he most definetely has a bright future in the Rangers jersey

TigerJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 02:39 AM
  #189
Fanned On It
Registered User
 
Fanned On It's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 1,862
vCash: 500
Just watched the condensed version: Hank was absolutely elite. Played amazing. The Rangers had wayy too many turnovers in their own zone trying to break out. That's what cost us the game. We also didn't generate many good scoring chances.

That's pretty much the gist of it. Didn't see enough to make player by player analysis besides Hank being the best goalie in the world.

Fanned On It is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 02:43 AM
  #190
tbassler
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 29
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by skymachine View Post
This team has absolutely no finish.


but it has some swedish

tbassler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 03:15 AM
  #191
egelband
Registered User
 
egelband's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: north finchley
Country: United States
Posts: 1,936
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrhockey193195 View Post
Might have hit Scrivens pad on the way in, but it's definitely still a disallowed goal.
Here's the thing, though. If you kick a puck over to a teammate and a defender slides over and knocks it it, is it still not a goal? No-goal is probably the right call, but if Moore kicks it into an opponent and it goes in, the nature of the play changes. As it was the goalie, it's probably moot. But if it had hit a defenseman or forward, I suspect it's a good goal. Just a minor point.

egelband is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 05:41 AM
  #192
fredrikstad
Registered User
 
fredrikstad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fredrikstad, Norway
Country: Norway
Posts: 1,166
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanned On It View Post
Just watched the condensed version: Hank was absolutely elite. Played amazing. The Rangers had wayy too many turnovers in their own zone trying to break out. That's what cost us the game. We also didn't generate many good scoring chances.

That's pretty much the gist of it. Didn't see enough to make player by player analysis besides Hank being the best goalie in the world.
But still, there is already someone who is ready to trade him, and give Talbot the starter job

fredrikstad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 06:01 AM
  #193
Ail
k.
 
Ail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mysidia
Country: United States
Posts: 17,051
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cabwaylingo View Post
Lundy is an amazing goalie, it was an enjoyable game tonight because I feel like our cities have a great connection that spans all of humanity.
Yeah I totally feel that too, man!

Wait, what?

__________________
Ail is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 06:29 AM
  #194
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 31,865
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by aufheben View Post
I'm not panicing, I just want those 3 hours of my life back. Oh well, Kreider destroying Voynov was cool.
Stop watching the games then.

RangerBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 06:35 AM
  #195
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 31,865
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR2007 View Post
We had to trade gabroik for multiple reason I'm not debating that . But we didn't really get much in return back for him.

I would have liked at least our 1st back or a young skilled winger

Seems like slats wanted current NHL players so we could fill our weak roster at the time
Teams weren't knocking down the Rangers door for Gaborik.

Moore is the 1st round pick. Columbus doesn't have any young skilled winger.

RangerBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 07:00 AM
  #196
haohmaru
#bdwyblueshirts
 
haohmaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fleming Island, Fl
Country: United States
Posts: 5,388
vCash: 500
The biggest problem here was faceoffs and, more specifically, losing key faceoffs. LAK won 40. NYR won 23.

haohmaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 07:57 AM
  #197
Idlerlee
Always play Richards
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oslo, Norway
Country: Norway
Posts: 2,046
vCash: 145
Food for thought, does the team play so well that we genuinely believe we can win every game ? And does the plausibility make a loss sting even more ?

Or is it equally terrible either way

Idlerlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 08:04 AM
  #198
Championship*
#Joel&Ellie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,503
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idlerlee View Post
Food for thought, does the team play so well that we genuinely believe we can win every game ? And does the plausibility make a loss sting even more ?

Or is it equally terrible either way
For me, definitely not. This is a mediocre team. Nothing has changed. Just because they beat some bad teams and went on a bit of a run means nothing. 1 goal scored over 2 games this weekend. Right back to not scoring.

Championship* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 08:13 AM
  #199
Leetch66
Registered User
 
Leetch66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PEI Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,149
vCash: 500
Oh well...could have been worse . Was very happy for the win in Montreal . A win last night would have been tough even with Nash in the game although he might have helped on the 5-3's . One of those 5 on 3's was a gift because the puck went over the glass off of a Ranger stick . I saw the replay on the King's broadcast . Henrik was a beast . I have to wonder if perhaps there might have been a wee bit of extra beers after the win in Montreal ? The West has about a .680 win/loss percentage against the East...losing to the Kings is nothing to be ashamed about...unlike not scoring on the PP . BTW...Scrivens being such a bad goalie...now has 3 shutouts . I blame AV mostly for this loss...new blood should have been inserted into that game last night . That was a no brainer IMO .

Leetch66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-18-2013, 08:14 AM
  #200
nevesis
#30
 
nevesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 8,828
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastafazul View Post
lundy great game but the one you gave up had you held position NO GOAL!
Some people just don't get how hockey works.

nevesis is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.