HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

edmonton-nashville or Dallas

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-10-2014, 03:39 PM
  #1
K DEN
The best
 
K DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,659
vCash: 500
edmonton-nashville or Dallas

What do you guys think of a trade like.

Yak
For
Josi

Or

Yak
1st
For
Goligoski

K DEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:41 PM
  #2
jhoops89
R.I.P. Thrashers
 
jhoops89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,446
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber View Post
What do you guys think of a trade like.

Yak
For
Josi

Or

Yak
1st
For
Goligoski
Who's Goligoski? The only Goligoski I know is on Dallas.

jhoops89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:41 PM
  #3
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 10,757
vCash: 50
For the first trade, I have sincere doubts that Nashville has any interest in acquiring a Russian forward such as Yakupov after Radulov, especially someone for someone such as Josi.


For the second trade, what? Did I read that right?

Avs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:42 PM
  #4
OwenFully
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,207
vCash: 500
Why is Goligoski's trade value so much higher than Josi's....

OwenFully is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:45 PM
  #5
YP44
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,223
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwenFully View Post
Why is Goligoski's trade value so much higher than Josi's....
That's what I was thinking I don't think Goligoski would cost yak.
Gagner + 2015 2nd

YP44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:45 PM
  #6
bleedblue1223
Fire Army
 
bleedblue1223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 27,640
vCash: 130
Goligoski doesn't get the 1st this year or next year and he doesn't get Yakupov either.

bleedblue1223 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:46 PM
  #7
K DEN
The best
 
K DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,659
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OwenFully View Post
Why is Goligoski's trade value so much higher than Josi's....
I personally consider him one of the best 2nd or 3rd dmans in the league.

If a high 1st a bit heavy for a team with 0 quality dman other them nurse and krefbom(spelling)

Yak for goligoski is a basis of the trade could change 1st into 2nd

I just feel Edmonton ownership want results and are tired of this "rebuild." That's why I feel Edmonton ships yak and 1st or 2nd for a very decent dman like goligoski.

K DEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:49 PM
  #8
HeavyMcHitter97
Registered User
 
HeavyMcHitter97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,256
vCash: 500
Oilers make the first trade but I doubt the preds do based on him being Russian

Oilers easily decline trade #2.

Goligoski doesn't have that much if any more value than Josi imo

HeavyMcHitter97 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:50 PM
  #9
K DEN
The best
 
K DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,659
vCash: 500
Fair enough on goligoski but I feel a yak for goligoski trade is a great trade for both sides

K DEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:50 PM
  #10
ManofSteel55
Registered User
 
ManofSteel55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 11,978
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber View Post
I personally consider him one of the best 2nd or 3rd dmans in the league.

If a high 1st a bit heavy for a team with 0 quality dman other them nurse and krefbom(spelling)

Yak for goligoski is a basis of the trade could change 1st into 2nd

I just feel Edmonton ownership want results and are tired of this "rebuild." That's why I feel Edmonton ships yak and 1st or 2nd for a very decent dman like goligoski.
Yak and a 1st is the price we would pay for much better defensemen than Goligoski. You must think that Yak has no value, let me ask you this. Would Dallas trade Nichushkin and their 1st for Jeff Petry? Because that is essentially what you are asking us to do here. At minimum, the 1st rounder is on the wrong side of the equation. Not close.

The Josi deal is much closer.

ManofSteel55 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:51 PM
  #11
HeavyMcHitter97
Registered User
 
HeavyMcHitter97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,256
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber View Post
I personally consider him one of the best 2nd or 3rd dmans in the league.

If a high 1st a bit heavy for a team with 0 quality dman other them nurse and krefbom(spelling)

Yak for goligoski is a basis of the trade could change 1st into 2nd

I just feel Edmonton ownership want results and are tired of this "rebuild." That's why I feel Edmonton ships yak and 1st or 2nd for a very decent dman like goligoski.
It's way too much for Goligoski. Our 1st alone is fair value but Stars wouldn't do it since they aren't rebuilding.

HeavyMcHitter97 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 03:53 PM
  #12
Soundgarden
Registered User
 
Soundgarden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spring Hill, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 8,877
vCash: 500
Nashville doesn't do this for two reasons. Yakupov's nationality and Josi's contract. It's pretty fair though.

Soundgarden is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 04:11 PM
  #13
McMozesmadness
5-14-6-1
 
McMozesmadness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,808
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber View Post
Fair enough on goligoski but I feel a yak for goligoski trade is a great trade for both sides
Whaaaaaaaaat

That is the definition of selling low

McMozesmadness is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 04:23 PM
  #14
preds1
Weber's Bomb
 
preds1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: TN
Country: United States
Posts: 2,551
vCash: 1548
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soundgarden View Post
Nashville doesn't do this for two reasons. Yakupov's nationality and Josi's contract. It's pretty fair though.
That and Josi has more goals and points. Not really the "top 3" palyer we need.
No way we trade our #2D who loves NSH for Yak.

Easy pass.

preds1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 05:26 PM
  #15
Flgatorguy87
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: East Nasty
Posts: 1,184
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber View Post
I personally consider him one of the best 2nd or 3rd dmans in the league.

If a high 1st a bit heavy for a team with 0 quality dman other them nurse and krefbom(spelling)

Yak for goligoski is a basis of the trade could change 1st into 2nd

I just feel Edmonton ownership want results and are tired of this "rebuild." That's why I feel Edmonton ships yak and 1st or 2nd for a very decent dman like goligoski.
I am so confused. Yak and a 1st or second to get a "decent dman", but then you offer less for Josi?

Flgatorguy87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 05:35 PM
  #16
john skull
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 781
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManofSteel55 View Post
Yak and a 1st is the price we would pay for much better defensemen than Goligoski. You must think that Yak has no value, let me ask you this. Would Dallas trade Nichushkin and their 1st for Jeff Petry? Because that is essentially what you are asking us to do here. At minimum, the 1st rounder is on the wrong side of the equation. Not close.

The Josi deal is much closer.
Um, not remotely similar. Gogo is a far superior dman and Nuke's game is just flat out better in every aspect right now. They may end up with similar value at some point. But right now Nuke is a fixture on the top line of a decent team, and is bigger, as fast, has as good or better offensive production, and is in another stratosphere defensively.

That Dallas offer is insane for Edmonton, but yours makes it look like a steal.

john skull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 05:40 PM
  #17
TheJuxtaposer
#LetJohnPlay
 
TheJuxtaposer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 32,722
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by john skull View Post
Um, not remotely similar. Gogo is a far superior dman and Nuke's game is just flat out better in every aspect right now. They may end up with similar value at some point. But right now Nuke is a fixture on the top line of a decent team, and is bigger, as fast, has as good or better offensive production, and is in another stratosphere defensively.

That Dallas offer is insane for Edmonton, but yours makes it look like a steal.
Petry is waaaaay better than Goligoski...

TheJuxtaposer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 05:43 PM
  #18
Diatomic
WHAT A MOVE, SCORES!
 
Diatomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Air Canada Centre
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,105
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mozesmadness View Post
Whaaaaaaaaat

That is the definition of selling low
better to sell low than see the player bust or bolt to russia.

Diatomic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 05:44 PM
  #19
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Country: United States
Posts: 9,494
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber View Post
What do you guys think of a trade like.

Yak
For
Josi

Or

Yak
1st
For
Goligoski
following your logical properties of trades....Josi <<<< Goligowski....ROFL

Djp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 05:52 PM
  #20
oconnor9sean
Benn & Seguin
 
oconnor9sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Austin/Fort Worth
Country: United States
Posts: 4,325
vCash: 500
Goligoski is a solid DMan, but jeez..... Lol.

oconnor9sean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 05:59 PM
  #21
Nemeth
Mo Money Mo Problems
 
Nemeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,169
vCash: 500
Oh yah Goligoski for your 1st......i'll personally purchase Goligoski's ticket to Edmonton.

Nemeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 07:21 PM
  #22
Mc5RingsAndABeer
5-14-6-1
 
Mc5RingsAndABeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 16,893
vCash: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diatomic View Post
better to sell low than see the player bust or bolt to russia.
No

Better to retain the asset and get competent coaching that can maximize that asset

Mc5RingsAndABeer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 07:24 PM
  #23
go4hockey
Registered User
 
go4hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alta Loma CA
Posts: 2,362
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber View Post
What do you guys think of a trade like.

Yak
For
Josi

Or

Yak
1st
For
Goligoski
Do you really think Goligoski has a higher value than Josi. I think most hockey fans would see the value being higher the other way.

go4hockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 07:30 PM
  #24
RastaRockett
Registered User
 
RastaRockett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Country: Kenya
Posts: 1,190
vCash: 500
Get Nill on the phone RIGHT NOW!

RastaRockett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-10-2014, 07:57 PM
  #25
ThirdManIn
Global Moderator
 
ThirdManIn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 48,595
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyHitter99 View Post
Oilers make the first trade but I doubt the preds do based on him being Russian

Oilers easily decline trade #2.

Goligoski doesn't have that much if any more value than Josi imo
Preds don't make the first trade out of team need and value of the player being traded. Yak's being Russian isn't the main problem, nor is it necessarily a problem at all. The main problem is right now Josi has more value than Yak in general, and infinitely more value to the Preds. A top pairing LHD on a long term, cheap contract is very valuable to Nashville, especially considering behind him on the left side are Ekholm and MDZ. Neither of those players is ready to stop into a full-time top pairing role. Yak may eventually be a great winger, or he may not, but right now his value is pretty low for a guy who was drafted first overall just a couple of summers ago. Potential on the wing <<<< known talent on the top pair.

The so-called "Russian factor" doesn't even need to be brought up in discussion of that first proposal.

ThirdManIn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.