Anyone like the idea of Akeson on a line with G? Maybe Couts? With G the defense will lapse, but Akeson can score. With Couts, Couts needs someone to help his O and could cover for Akeson's defensive liabilities?
LA are the epitome of what's wrong with hockey. They've mastered the defensive side of the game but it's incredibly boring to watch, especially as they can't score goals themselves. I'd rather win 9-8 than 1-0 any day.