Prospect Ratings

Leetch · 09-30-2003, 03:28 PM

Can we get an update on that? It's my favorite part of the page

Draft Guru · 09-30-2003, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leetch

Can we get an update on that? It's my favorite part of the page

I'm off from work Thursday night. I'll see what I can do..sound fair?

E-Train · 10-02-2003, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Guru

I'm off from work Thursday night. I'll see what I can do..sound fair?

Thanks for updating the page

I did have a few questions.

Hasn't Inman been released from the organization? Also, wouldn't Stals be in the top 10 these days?

If you get a chance to update that would be great. Thanks

#37-#93-#27* · 10-02-2003, 08:17 AM

How sad is it that the player we just picked up on waivers, the player we're leaving unprotected in the waiver draft, is ranked as our #2 prospect. I don't agree with it but I think it's sad that it is even considered.

I also must say Dom Moore, Juris Stals, Jake Taylor, Henrik Lundqvist, Marcus Jonason, and the rest of the darkhorses are not getting their due credit and it seems awkward they're ranked so low specially after reading the articles on them.

on edit: I noticed none of the 2003 draftees are there so I assume it has not been updated?

RGF · 10-02-2003, 08:38 AM

where are this years draft prospects?..it doesnt seem like anything was changed...inman is not ours anymore. stals should be in the top 20 along with taylor. jessiman should be in the top 10...baranka in the top 20.

Dorthmall · 10-02-2003, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RGF

where are this years draft prospects?..it doesnt seem like anything was changed...inman is not ours anymore. stals should be in the top 20 along with taylor. jessiman should be in the top 10...baranka in the top 20.

Seems pretty updated to me. Check again now.

E-Train · 10-02-2003, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dorthmall

Seems pretty updated to me. Check again now.

Yep, it looks really good now

Draft Guru · 10-02-2003, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E-Train

Yep, it looks really good now

I just finished it. It's not thorough by any means, it's just something a bit more updated to satisfy the readers for now. Have a look and let me know your comments/reactions/questions.

E-Train · 10-02-2003, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Guru

I just finished it. It's not thorough by any means, it's just something a bit more updated to satisfy the readers for now. Have a look and let me know your comments/reactions/questions.

DG, great job. It looks pretty thorough to me. That top 20 is as accurate as anyone can expect. thanks

#37-#93-#27* · 10-02-2003, 11:52 AM

Looks good.

Olorin · 10-02-2003, 12:00 PM

Nice work, Draft Guru! I was wondering why you lowered Martz's ranking. He had a pretty good year with New Hampshire playing with Saviano and Collins.

Draft Guru · 10-02-2003, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RangerFan13

Nice work, Draft Guru! I was wondering why you lowered Martz's ranking. He had a pretty good year with New Hampshire playing with Saviano and Collins.

woops, meant to hit in 4.5, instead I put in 3.5. It's been fixed.

I think Martz is somewhere between a high-end AHL talent/border line NHLer.

We'll see though in the future.

**Jonathan.** · 10-02-2003, 12:10 PM

ONLY thing I'd say is move Roche up to a 6. He's REAL good and will be a great asset in the future.