HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Rangers Robbed of a Goal Against San Jose

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-16-2014, 04:47 PM
  #51
Machinehead
Moderator
Get Well Gordie
 
Machinehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New York New York
Country: United States
Posts: 35,161
vCash: 500
FWIW the Rangers have had calls go against them this year that were quite conclusive so I can understand the disdain.

__________________
Official 2014-15 Dan Girardi Own Goal Tally: 0 Kevin Klein: 2

"It's Mario Götze!" -Ian Darke
Machinehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:47 PM
  #52
Ola
Registered User
 
Ola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 17,722
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by treefidy View Post
Lol...

1. You have no idea when the whistle blew on the replay.
2. You can never see the puck completely cross the line.

How is that robbed?
Give it up.

Everyone can see that it's a goal.

Ola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:47 PM
  #53
Fataldogg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,922
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StalockSuperfan View Post
That makes perfect sense, but unfortunately the replay rule doesn't work that way. It was probably a goal, but again, where is that white space that proves it?
And there in lies the problem. Unfortunately, Toronto needs to really overhaul how they call a goal. I see this happen way too often, not just to the Rangers, of goals that should clearly be goals.

Toronto needs the puck 10 inches over the red line with tons of white around it for there even to be a chance they call it a goal. And even than, the ref will somehow come out and say he had intent to blow a whistle.

I just want more consistency out of the league.

Whatever happened to the clear top of the net (fiber glass on top of the net). They need a new camera system, or some better method, to see what is a goal. Because there are a lot of goals that happen that are called no goals because of this non-sense.

Fataldogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:47 PM
  #54
jniklast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Germany
Posts: 4,760
vCash: 500
Probably the right call according to the rules, but a mockery of common sense.

jniklast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:48 PM
  #55
SnowblindNYR
Registered User
 
SnowblindNYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 17,282
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl with a C View Post
Sharks are owed one after all the robberies that they've endured. Also, this one is marginal at best. Can anybody show me a picture of the puck inside the net? You can't assume, you have to show a picture of the puck INSIDE THE RED LINE with WHITE BETWEEN THE PUCK. Can you show such a picture?

(Hint: You can't)
Then get one of those against a team that hasn't been on the losing end of every ****ing one of these, you're not owed anything at our expense.

SnowblindNYR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:48 PM
  #56
SANTArelli25
SAMCRO
 
SANTArelli25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,277
vCash: 0
The war room has been especially awful since the Olympics.

SANTArelli25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:48 PM
  #57
bigwillie
Registered User
 
bigwillie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Country: United States
Posts: 5,979
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to bigwillie
It's an incredibly slippery slope. Once you make assumptions, even basic ones, it can be hard to draw a hard line about what's an acceptable assumption and what's not.

The league's rule is that they need conclusive evidence - an actual image of the puck fully across the goal line. They did not have that here, and even though it is a reasonable assumption the puck was across the line, they cannot start making such assumptions.

bigwillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:48 PM
  #58
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 32,975
vCash: 500
There's no video evidence that shows the puck in the net with white between it and the goal line. Unfortunately, that's how the league operates for these things. You can deduce that it did cross the line but w/o any real evidence, they can't overturn it. And no, Niemi pulling the puck out doesn't show that since you can't see where the puck came from and whether it was completely behind the goal line.

I understand where upset Rangers fans are coming from though. Sharks have had the most disallowed goals this season and at least five or six of them unjustly.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:49 PM
  #59
Clowe Me
Registered User
 
Clowe Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: 530
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 18,869
vCash: 500
You can assume all you want, rangers fans, but no overhead angle actually showed the puck cross the line. Or when the ref blew his whistle.

No conclusive evidence. No goal.

Clowe Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:49 PM
  #60
Ser Jorah Mormont
Lord Friendzone
 
Ser Jorah Mormont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Down Under
Country: Australia
Posts: 313
vCash: 500
Correct call was made.

Ser Jorah Mormont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:49 PM
  #61
AHB
Registered User
 
AHB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,230
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ola View Post
Give it up.

Everyone can see that it's a goal.
It has to be CONCLUSIVE. There was no video of the puck in the net. There was a video of the puck projecting over the net. But you are absolutely not allowed to deem a goal if you cannot CONCLUSIVELY see the puck over the line.

It is not a goal. It was subjective. Odds are, yes, it was over. But there is no hard proof.

To say it's a goal and overturn an on-ice ruling, you literally need a picture of the puck, over the line.

AHB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:50 PM
  #62
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 24,283
vCash: 500
Never saw anything that showed it in the net over the line.

Can't draw conclusions.

sjshark91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:50 PM
  #63
CarpeNoctem
I Pity #26
 
CarpeNoctem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: In The Night
Posts: 2,223
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SANTArelli25 View Post
The war room has been especially awful since the Olympics.
Perhaps the incompetence has crossed the Atlantic.

CarpeNoctem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:50 PM
  #64
Weastern Bias
Patrick Starleau
 
Weastern Bias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: SJ
Country: United States
Posts: 902
vCash: 500
MSG pumping in the canned heat

Weastern Bias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:50 PM
  #65
yrrebbor
Registered User
 
yrrebbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: New York, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 715
vCash: 500
Where is the video from the goal cam? Why wasn't that looked at or shown?

yrrebbor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:51 PM
  #66
Tanner Glass
Call me Nils
 
Tanner Glass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Country: Austria
Posts: 17,586
vCash: 500
A goalie can cover the puck with his glove, and then move it behind the goal line, and it won't count because they can't see the puck.

It's bush league, but I've come to expect that of this league

Tanner Glass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:51 PM
  #67
I Am Classless
Registered User
 
I Am Classless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Falkland Islands
Posts: 1,768
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clowe Me View Post
You can assume all you want, rangers fans, but no overhead angle actually showed the puck cross the line. Or when the ref blew his whistle.

No conclusive evidence. No goal.
Had nothing to do with the call - you're watching the game?

I Am Classless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:51 PM
  #68
Fitzy
All Is Well
 
Fitzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,925
vCash: 500
There are two possibilities

1. The puck was across

2. The puck traveled to a parallel universe for the time that it would've otherwise been in the net.

We can't assume anything.

Fitzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:51 PM
  #69
Chimp
Registered User
 
Chimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In my food garden.
Country: Sweden
Posts: 10,478
vCash: 500
https://vine.co/v/MhmP17ixT2U

Puck is in the net, but since the NHL don't have any sort of impressive technology in 2014 to check it up, this is where we are. No conclusive evidence of the puck being in the net, because the puck is in the net. Just awesome. Get a chip in the pucks already?

And at the end of the period, the refs were babysitters for San Jose. After an icing call, San Jose had one man short on the ice. Did the refs drop the puck, like they're supposed to? Or give them a delay of game penalty? No. They skated over and asked if they wanted another player on the ice. Comical at best, incompetent reffing.

Chimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:51 PM
  #70
Machinehead
Moderator
Get Well Gordie
 
Machinehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New York New York
Country: United States
Posts: 35,161
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SANTArelli25 View Post
The war room has been especially awful since the Olympics.
If you mean the 1896 Olympics in Athens then yes, they've been awful since the Olympics.

Machinehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:52 PM
  #71
SA16
Two by two...
 
SA16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 2,038
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AHB View Post
It has to be CONCLUSIVE. There was no video of the puck in the net. There was a video of the puck projecting over the net. But you are absolutely not allowed to deem a goal if you cannot CONCLUSIVELY see the puck over the line.

It is not a goal. It was subjective. Odds are, yes, it was over. But there is no hard proof.

To say it's a goal and overturn an on-ice ruling, you literally need a picture of the puck, over the line.
The rule is not you have to see the puck in the net for it to be called a goal. That's not even the definition of conclusive. In the most clear case - if the goalie catches the puck in his glove outside the crease. Then closes his hand tightly on the puck so you can't see it. Then for some reason places his hand in the goal that would be a good goal - even if it wasn't originally called one and went to replay.

SA16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:52 PM
  #72
MTrangers
Registered User
 
MTrangers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 605
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jniklast View Post
Probably the right call according to the rules, but a mockery of common sense.
This exactly. This league is Dumb and Dumber status. I understand the rule basically says they made the right call but OUTSIDE of the stupidly worded rules I'm sure anyone can deduct that when the puck slides past the line and out of sight that it is in fact a goal. It does not disenegrate, it does not teleport. It sits in the net. Christ...let people make the right decisions.

MTrangers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:52 PM
  #73
Bird Law
Daisy's back.
 
Bird Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Country Roads
Country: United States
Posts: 73,595
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Bird Law
The NHL doesn't believe in simple physics, I guess.

__________________
"Of course giving Sather cap space is like giving teenagers whiskey and car keys." - SBOB
"Watching Sather build a team is like watching a blind man with no fingers trying to put together an elaborate puzzle." - Shadowtron
"Used to be only Twinkies and cockroaches could survive a nuke. I'd add Habs to that. I'm convinced the CH stands for Club du Hypocrisy." - Gee Wally
Bird Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:53 PM
  #74
Dactyl
LMFAO KOSTKA
 
Dactyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 8,232
vCash: 500
https://vine.co/v/MhmP17ixT2U

I see white in between the puck and the goal line. Looks conclusive to me.

Dactyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2014, 04:54 PM
  #75
McSkittlez
Jumbo Trollton
 
McSkittlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 9,191
vCash: 500
Sharks feed showed replays where I didn't see the puck cross the line. So in this case refs got it right. If you can show me a replay that says otherwise then feel free to show it.

McSkittlez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.