HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

jacob markstrom

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-11-2014, 09:55 AM
  #1
rajinikanthfan1
rajinikanthfan1
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 605
vCash: 500
jacob markstrom

just out of curiosity what will it cost to get him to another team?

rajinikanthfan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 09:58 AM
  #2
Mutagenesis
Nucks/Isles
 
Mutagenesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Representin' the ABQ
Country: Canada
Posts: 951
vCash: 2552
His value is at an all time low, why would you want to trade him now?

Mutagenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:01 AM
  #3
rajinikanthfan1
rajinikanthfan1
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 605
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutagenesis View Post
His value is at an all time low, why would you want to trade him now?
no i mean in the off season what could other teams get for him with lack starting more than markstrom?

rajinikanthfan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:14 AM
  #4
Love
Fire Benning
 
Love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,080
vCash: 500
Zero benefit for Vancouver to trade him at this point. Still has HUGE potential, but like the other poster said, his value is low right now.

I highly doubt he is moved. I could actually see him overtaking Lack as starter at some point next season.

Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:32 AM
  #5
The Macho Man
Fire Cooper
 
The Macho Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 24,428
vCash: 134
His value is low - his potential is high.

Makes zero sense to trade him.

The Macho Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:32 AM
  #6
alpine4life
Registered User
 
alpine4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,621
vCash: 500
-sign decent back up during summer (UFA)
-send Markstrom to AHL to polish his game and boost his confidence back up a bit

alpine4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:34 AM
  #7
EnforceTheLaus
Moderator
#TeachTheTrospiracy
 
EnforceTheLaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,618
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpine4life View Post
-sign decent back up during summer (UFA)
-send Markstrom to AHL to polish his game and boost his confidence back up a bit
He is waiver elligable next season. On a 1-way contract.

EnforceTheLaus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:47 AM
  #8
TOGuy14
Registered User
 
TOGuy14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,172
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by doglover8891 View Post
just out of curiosity what will it cost to get him to another team?
Well Vancouver currently seems to be in the business of consistently downgrading their goaltending so maybe Andrew Raycroft is available somewhere?

TOGuy14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 11:01 AM
  #9
Ferkland
Mumen Rider
 
Ferkland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 15,770
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOGuy14 View Post
Well Vancouver currently seems to be in the business of consistently downgrading their goaltending so maybe Andrew Raycroft is available somewhere?
Raycroft retired.

Ferkland is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 11:04 AM
  #10
StuckOutHere
Registered User
 
StuckOutHere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4,433
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnforceTheLaus View Post
He is waiver elligable next season. On a 1-way contract.

StuckOutHere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 11:07 AM
  #11
ShootIt
Registered User
 
ShootIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 561
Country: United States
Posts: 11,909
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnforceTheLaus View Post
He is waiver elligable next season. On a 1-way contract.
Has he played enough professional games(AHL+NHL) to be waiver eligible?

The one way just means they'll have to pay him his NHL salary next year, even if he is in the AHL.

ShootIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 11:23 AM
  #12
Nick1219
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 721
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuckOutHere View Post
I think poster was referring to the fact that not only is he waiver eligible, but he's additionally on a 1 way contract.

Edit: at least I hope that's the case (not sure if he's waiver eligible or not)

Nick1219 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 03:05 PM
  #13
Ho Borvat
Registered User
 
Ho Borvat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,374
vCash: 500
Its kind of funny, these were some posts from a Value Of Markstrom thread back in July 2013. A popular proposal was Markstrom + Bjustad for Yakupov and a 1st....



Quote:
Originally Posted by AwesomePanthers View Post
lol, way to overrated Schneider. Markströms potential is higher than Schneiders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigfatfist View Post
Markstrom's solidified as part of their core prospects to build around (Markstrom, Gudbranson, Huberdeau, Barkov). He's not moving without an equally valuable piece coming back in.

FLA have so many prospects. No quantity for quality will work for them or Tallon. IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeydude1 View Post
Never going to happen. Markstrom is a part of our Future. He is our #1 goalie that we have been preparing for a while.

Ho Borvat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 03:38 PM
  #14
FlaPanthers11
Fire Kelly
 
FlaPanthers11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Country: United States
Posts: 6,743
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kack zassian View Post
Its kind of funny, these were some posts from a Value Of Markstrom thread back in July 2013. A popular proposal was Markstrom + Bjustad for Yakupov and a 1st....
And then yet another season passed without the slightest amount of progression.

FlaPanthers11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 03:54 PM
  #15
THE Green Man
Registered User
 
THE Green Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,291
vCash: 500
I wouldn't trade him until we've seen what he can do. To trade Luongo for him, someone must have seen something in this guys game. He was regarded as one of the top goalie prospects a year ago. Even in his first start as a Canuck last night he looked sharp. Let in 3 but got no help on all 3 goals. Breakaway, rebound with no defensive awareness from anyone and a 2-1 odd man rush. Sure theses 3 games that we can watch of him will be a small sample size, but unless he really sh*** the bed, or we can get an absolute steal for a UFA goalie, I don't see him going anywhere.

Let the thing 3 and thing 4 debate begin.

THE Green Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 04:10 PM
  #16
Ho Borvat
Registered User
 
Ho Borvat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,374
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlaPanthers11 View Post
And then yet another season passed without the slightest amount of progression.
I really hadn't followed up on Markstrom over the season, but its just funny to see people go from saying hes an elite prospect/franchise caliber goalie to saying hes a bust within a 9 month window.

Ho Borvat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 04:14 PM
  #17
SoupyFIN
Global Moderator
#CatsAren'tComing
 
SoupyFIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Finland
Posts: 35,105
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by kack zassian View Post
Its kind of funny, these were some posts from a Value Of Markstrom thread back in July 2013. A popular proposal was Markstrom + Bjustad for Yakupov and a 1st....
He looked kinda good last season with a team that hung him out to dry on a nightly basis (minus the one soft weak angle goal per game), then just hit rock bottom this year. Who knows why, maybe it's the new pads, the pressure of finally making the big league or a mental thing.

Though I don't see what you're trying to prove here, since prospects get valued by their potential all the time on hf. Pretty sure you would have said the same thing if you switch Lack in there.

SoupyFIN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 04:21 PM
  #18
EnforceTheLaus
Moderator
#TeachTheTrospiracy
 
EnforceTheLaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 7,618
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kack zassian View Post
I really hadn't followed up on Markstrom over the season, but its just funny to see people go from saying hes an elite prospect/franchise caliber goalie to saying hes a bust within a 9 month window.
Very few people now would call him a bust. I still think he'll be a good starter but he'll take the long road to get there. I'm talking 3-5 years from now. The rest of our prospects are way ahead of where Markstrom is. So it was great that Tallon was able to poach a current top goalie for very little while also keeping Van on the hook for recapture penalties.


Also I wouldn't move Bjugstad for Yak alone, much less a package

EnforceTheLaus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 04:37 PM
  #19
CoolburnIsGone
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,072
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShootIt View Post
Has he played enough professional games(AHL+NHL) to be waiver eligible?

The one way just means they'll have to pay him his NHL salary next year, even if he is in the AHL.
He's absolutely waiver eligible because he can only be exempt for a number of years (4) or number or games played (72) in the NHL. While he hasnt reached the games played number, this season was his 4th season since signing his first contract so next yr, he's no longer exempt.

CoolburnIsGone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 07:15 PM
  #20
pb1300
#CatsAreComing
 
pb1300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Aiyio, Greece
Country: Greece
Posts: 12,805
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to pb1300
Quote:
Originally Posted by nucks94 View Post
I wouldn't trade him until we've seen what he can do. To trade Luongo for him, someone must have seen something in this guys game. He was regarded as one of the top goalie prospects a year ago. Even in his first start as a Canuck last night he looked sharp. Let in 3 but got no help on all 3 goals. Breakaway, rebound with no defensive awareness from anyone and a 2-1 odd man rush. Sure theses 3 games that we can watch of him will be a small sample size, but unless he really sh*** the bed, or we can get an absolute steal for a UFA goalie, I don't see him going anywhere.

Let the thing 3 and thing 4 debate begin.
Ive always been a fan/supporter of Marky, and I still am, but before he was traded, I was beginning have my doubts. I think a lot of his issues can be corrected by coaching, but his mental aspect to the game is what bothers me. Too many times us Panthers fans have seen his inconsistency early in games, which has me question his preparation. He has the size and skill to be a great goaltender, but in order to achieve that, I believe he has a long road ahead of him.

As far as his worth, he is obviously worth much more to the Canucks now, because his value is defintely at an all time low.

pb1300 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:12 PM
  #21
Beezeral
Registered User
 
Beezeral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 4,495
vCash: 500
Predicting it now, markstrom is not on the Canucks next season. Torts isn't going to go into the season with 2 green goalies at the NHL level unless the Canucks are in a full rebuild.

Beezeral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-11-2014, 10:21 PM
  #22
LOLKarlsson*
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,563
vCash: 500
I can't see him having any value, really. Maybe a team itching for a backup takes him on for a 7th or something.

Better off keeping and grooming him.

LOLKarlsson* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2014, 12:18 AM
  #23
ProstheticConscience
but just as a friend
 
ProstheticConscience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canuck Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,726
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beezeral View Post
Predicting it now, markstrom is not on the Canucks next season. Torts isn't going to go into the season with 2 green goalies at the NHL level unless the Canucks are in a full rebuild.
Bolded is relevant.

And seriously, wtf would we trade Markstrom for right now? Makes no sense to trade him. Better off keeping him and hoping we can put his development back on track.

ProstheticConscience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2014, 12:21 AM
  #24
deckercky
Registered User
 
deckercky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,732
vCash: 1125
Canucks might not be going into the season with Torts...

deckercky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2014, 12:24 AM
  #25
canuck4life16
It what it is-mccann
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancity
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,380
vCash: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beezeral View Post
Predicting it now, markstrom is not on the Canucks next season. Torts isn't going to go into the season with 2 green goalies at the NHL level unless the Canucks are in a full rebuild.
first of all Torts is likely not here next year......and there no problem having a 1A 1B battle for starting job

canuck4life16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:39 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2016 All Rights Reserved.