HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Interference on Lundqvist on 2nd goal

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-02-2014, 07:42 PM
  #26
OilerTyler
Fire MacT!
 
OilerTyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,511
vCash: 50
That wasn't interference

OilerTyler is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:43 PM
  #27
Classicnamesup
MVP Backhand Slapper
 
Classicnamesup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Guru Meditation
Posts: 7,878
vCash: 500
Don't think he was going to make the save anyway, wouldn't have found the puck

Classicnamesup is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:44 PM
  #28
nikonsniper*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandysan View Post
So he was going to make a save by divining where the puck was? he had no idea where the puck was, his only hope was that it was hit by a stick and it was not.
The ability to make a save is not the deciding factor on if a goalie was interfered with or not. 90% of the GI calls in the NHL are called even when the puck didnt make it in the net.

The two are not connected. Its pretty simple.

nikonsniper* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:45 PM
  #29
Sky Valley
Registered User
 
Sky Valley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NBNJ
Country: United States
Posts: 2,089
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Sky Valley
interference calls aren't based on a totally subjective guess as to whether the goalie can make the save or not. if he's interfered with, he's interfered with. malkin pinned his arm down with the stick. that's interference.

Sky Valley is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:46 PM
  #30
Quarter
AUSTON 20:16
 
Quarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,417
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleA45 View Post
Looked more like lundquist initiated contact with milk in to try and stop him from batting in the puck.
If that's the case, the precedent set in the Habs/Lightning series says that shouldn't be a goal. That being said, Lundqvist still had no idea where the puck was and had no chance of making the save even if he did. Good goal.

Quarter is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:47 PM
  #31
Mika Hoffmanijad
Registered User
 
Mika Hoffmanijad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Country: Palestine
Posts: 9,332
vCash: 966
When you play Pittsburgh and Montreal dont expect fair officiating.

Mika Hoffmanijad is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:48 PM
  #32
Dustin Peener
First of his name
 
Dustin Peener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 66,700
vCash: 500
If GI was based on whether he would have saved it or not, Fleury for example could be completely wiped out with an empty net and the ref could say "oh he's rubbish, he wouldn't have saved it anyway"

Dustin Peener is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:48 PM
  #33
sandysan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,805
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikonsniper View Post
The ability to make a save is not the deciding factor on if a goalie was interfered with or not. 90% of the GI calls in the NHL are called even when the puck didnt make it in the net.

The two are not connected. Its pretty simple.
Thats not interferance in any reasonable sense of the word. His only hope was that a stick hit it over the post, but that didnt happen

sandysan is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:48 PM
  #34
Sky Valley
Registered User
 
Sky Valley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NBNJ
Country: United States
Posts: 2,089
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Sky Valley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senz View Post
When you play Pittsburgh and Montreal dont expect fair officiating.
officiating has been an absolute mess in this game, but it hasn't been biased.

Sky Valley is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:48 PM
  #35
Novak Djokovic
#12 and counting...
 
Novak Djokovic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,644
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senz View Post
When you play Pittsburgh and Montreal dont expect fair officiating.
You should watch tonight's game more carefully then.

Novak Djokovic is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:49 PM
  #36
DearDiary
Registered User
 
DearDiary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,858
vCash: 12866
How is it interference when Lundquist initiated it?

Puck is in the air, Henrik has no idea where it is. Sees Malkin knows where it is, ignores puck and tries to block his stick from hitting it.

It's clear cut, in fact I'd say there's not even room for debate. Was Malkin supposed to ignore the puck just because Henrik tries to block his stick?

DearDiary is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:52 PM
  #37
The Grim Reaper*
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Country: United States
Posts: 714
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by illpucks View Post
It's a joke that this is not reviewable. Discredits the league and the sport.
I disagree. There was not goalie interference on that play.

The Grim Reaper* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:53 PM
  #38
nikonsniper*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandysan View Post
Thats not interferance in any reasonable sense of the word. His only hope was that a stick hit it over the post, but that didnt happen
Again, you are not understanding this.

If that play happens and the puck goes in the net, or the play happens and the puck rolls into the corner instead, in both cases, its GI.

GI does not depend on (A) of the puck went in or not or (B) if the chance of making the save didn't change.

Malkins stick coming down on Lundqvist arm is all that matters, restricting the motion of that arm, even a little, EVEN IF THE ARM WASN'T MOVING TOWARDS THE PUCK, means its GI.

at the least, swinging your stick and making contact with another player, goalie or not, is something the NHL usually frowns upon.

nikonsniper* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:53 PM
  #39
JaeTM
Registered User
 
JaeTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 1,521
vCash: 500
Malkin's stick interfere's with Lundqvist's glove before it goes in. Shouldn't have counted. Unbelievable that that's not reviewable.

JaeTM is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:54 PM
  #40
penguins2946*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 23,813
vCash: 500
Neal's shot went up straight in the air off of Lundqvist, and it falls behind Lundqvist. Lundqvist has no idea where it is. Malkin sees the falling puck behind Lundqvist, and tries to swing at it. Lundqvist, not knowing where it was, saw Malkin go for the puck, so he tries to impede Malkin from getting the puck. Malkin hits Lundqvist's arm, and he pushes it back slightly. The puck hits off of Lundqvist's back and rolls in. It could have gone either way. Malkin did touch Lundqvist, but Lundqvist initiated the contact.

penguins2946* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:54 PM
  #41
FinRuutu
Red Wins
 
FinRuutu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Helsinki
Country: Finland
Posts: 5,996
vCash: 500
Topic isn't quite accurate because it wasn't an interference.

FinRuutu is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:55 PM
  #42
illpucks
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 10,706
vCash: 500
It is an NHL rule that an opposing player is not allowed to prevent a goalie's ability to make a play on a shot.

illpucks is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:55 PM
  #43
penguins2946*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 23,813
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaeTM View Post
Malkin's stick interfere's with Lundqvist's glove before it goes in. Shouldn't have counted. Unbelievable that that's not reviewable.
Lundqvist initiated the contact, which is why it was not called GI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by illpucks View Post
It is an NHL rule that an opposing player is not allowed to prevent a goalie's ability to make a play on a shot.
But Malkin didn't prevent Lundqvist from making a save. It was behind Lundqvist when Malkin made contact.

penguins2946* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:56 PM
  #44
BigDaddyLurch
#Habs-R-FUBAR
 
BigDaddyLurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BargainBinVille
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,150
vCash: 500
...it's interference whether Henrik knew where it was or not...interference is interference...

BigDaddyLurch is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:59 PM
  #45
Zirakzigil
Registered User
 
Zirakzigil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,902
vCash: 494
If you want to argue about goalie interference being reviewable by all means I agree with you. But that was not goalie interference.

Zirakzigil is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:59 PM
  #46
The Grim Reaper*
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Country: United States
Posts: 714
vCash: 500
So this conversation will go on for hours and the outcome will be around 50/50, yet we expect a referee to be able to make the 100% correct call (when we cannot even decide on what that is) in a fraction of a second. It's unfair to pin this on a referee, it wasn't clear cut.

The Grim Reaper* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 07:59 PM
  #47
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 44,349
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...it's interference whether Henrik knew where it was or not...interference is interference...
There is absolutely no way that was a penalty on Malkin. You can argue incidental contact to disallow the goal, but not an actual Goalie Interference penalty.

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:00 PM
  #48
Brian Boyle
ZibaneFAM
 
Brian Boyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Playing video games
Country: United States
Posts: 61,803
vCash: 50
Incidental contact, not interference, at all.

__________________
Brian Boyle is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:00 PM
  #49
Big McLargehuge
Global Moderator
Star Kunitz
 
Big McLargehuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Country: Iceland
Posts: 64,531
vCash: 2563
How on Earth is Lunqvist's glove going to make that save anyway? He idn't even know where the damn puck was.


The excuse gun was cocked and loaded before the series already started. The officiating in this game has been bad, both ways.

__________________
“The most terrifying fact about the universe is not that it is hostile, but that it is indifferent. If we can come to terms with this indifference and accept the challenges of life within the boundaries of death, our existence as a species can have genuine meaning and fulfillment. However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light.” - Stanley Kubrick
Big McLargehuge is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 08:01 PM
  #50
nikonsniper*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 901
vCash: 500
I dont know why people dont understand this. Even if Lundqvist has a pure 0% chance of getting to thaty puck, he can still be interfered with.

A player could take a puck, shoot it out of the zone, then turn around and hit the goalie with a stick, and its still a penalty. Puck going into the net, irrelevant. Goalie knowing where the puck is, irrelevant. The chance of a save being made changing or not, irrelevant.

nikonsniper* is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2016 All Rights Reserved.