HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Interference on Lundqvist on 2nd goal

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-02-2014, 09:01 PM
  #51
JaeTM
Registered User
 
JaeTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 1,230
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vokouna Maattata View Post
Lundqvist initiated the contact, which is why it was not called GI.
Malkin's stick changes Hanks movement which ends up knocking the puck in. Yeah, it looked like it was going in either way, but you never know. We've all seen the puck do freaky things. Like the person above me said, interference is interference. The goalie was prevented from doing anything about it. Should not be a goal in any form. And Malkin clearly swung his stick. Lundqvist didn't throw his arm into Malkin.

JaeTM is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:01 PM
  #52
nikonsniper*
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big McLargehuge View Post
How on Earth is Lunqvist's glove going to make that save anyway? He idn't even know where the damn puck was.


The excuse gun was cocked and loaded before the series already started. The officiating in this game has been bad, both ways.
Tell me how that matters.

nikonsniper* is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:01 PM
  #53
Insta
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Insta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,628
vCash: 500
69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.


Puck pops up and is free game for Malkin to go for. He's allowed to make incidental contact.

Insta is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:02 PM
  #54
Big McLargehuge
Global Moderator
HFBoards: Night's Watch
 
Big McLargehuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Country: Iceland
Posts: 55,642
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insta View Post
69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.
Boom.

__________________
“The most terrifying fact about the universe is not that it is hostile, but that it is indifferent. If we can come to terms with this indifference and accept the challenges of life within the boundaries of death, our existence as a species can have genuine meaning and fulfillment. However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light.” - Stanley Kubrick
http://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/054.gif
Big McLargehuge is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:02 PM
  #55
Vokouna Maattata
#PouliotWatch2015
 
Vokouna Maattata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14,020
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insta View Post
69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.
And close thread here. It's a good goal.

Vokouna Maattata is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:02 PM
  #56
illpucks
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,925
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinRuutu View Post
Yeah, worst thing about is that it only shows how well hes informed of NHL rules, not that well.
This is not solely my opinion, the play-by-play guy on CBC said there was a missed call. It's not about me vs the Penguins. I am simply calling out a play. I will call out a play if there is a missed call, not because I dislike a team.


Last edited by JC Numminen: 05-02-2014 at 09:05 PM. Reason: Not needed
illpucks is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:03 PM
  #57
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 34,625
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikonsniper View Post
I dont know why people dont understand this. Even if Lundqvist has a pure 0% chance of getting to thaty puck, he can still be interfered with.

A player could take a puck, shoot it out of the zone, then turn around and hit the goalie with a stick, and its still a penalty. Puck going into the net, irrelevant. Goalie knowing where the puck is, irrelevant. The chance of a save being made changing or not, irrelevant.
but there is no way that was goalie interference. At worst it was incidental contact.

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:03 PM
  #58
The Grim Reaper
Registered User
 
The Grim Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Country: United States
Posts: 416
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insta View Post
69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.


Puck pops up and is free game for Malkin to go for. He's allowed to make incidental contact.
Well, that's pretty clear. Thank you.

The Grim Reaper is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:03 PM
  #59
BigDaddyLurch
Deleted Posts Leader
 
BigDaddyLurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Exiled from Reality
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,878
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ogrezilla View Post
There is absolutely no way that was a penalty on Malkin. You can argue incidental contact to disallow the goal, but not an actual Goalie Interference penalty.
...didn't say it was a GI Penalty on Malkin...he interfered with Lundqvist's ability to react to the loose puck, goal should have been waved off...

BigDaddyLurch is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:03 PM
  #60
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 34,625
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikonsniper View Post
Tell me how that matters.
because it wasn't goalie interference, and the ability to save the puck absolutely is a factor in an incidental contact call.

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:04 PM
  #61
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 34,625
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insta View Post
69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.


Puck pops up and is free game for Malkin to go for. He's allowed to make incidental contact.
well, there it is.

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:05 PM
  #62
BigDaddyLurch
Deleted Posts Leader
 
BigDaddyLurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Exiled from Reality
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,878
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insta View Post
69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.


Puck pops up and is free game for Malkin to go for. He's allowed to make incidental contact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big McLargehuge View Post
Boom.
...that wasn't incidental contact...no boom...

BigDaddyLurch is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:06 PM
  #63
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 34,625
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...that wasn't incidental contact...no boom...
that would be the weakest goalie interference penalty I've ever seen

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:07 PM
  #64
Astro99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Hershey PA
Country: United States
Posts: 260
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...that wasn't incidental contact...no boom...
Definitely Boom. Big save by Fleury Boom!

Astro99 is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:07 PM
  #65
Vokouna Maattata
#PouliotWatch2015
 
Vokouna Maattata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14,020
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...that wasn't incidental contact...no boom...
Yes it was. Malkin was going for the puck.

Vokouna Maattata is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:08 PM
  #66
BigDaddyLurch
Deleted Posts Leader
 
BigDaddyLurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Exiled from Reality
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,878
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...didn't say it was a GI Penalty on Malkin...he interfered with Lundqvist's ability to react to the loose puck, goal should have been waved off...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ogrezilla View Post
that would be the weakest goalie interference penalty I've ever seen

BigDaddyLurch is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:09 PM
  #67
danmcn12
#freeRedmond
 
danmcn12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,790
vCash: 500
Interference. Can't hit the goalie. Period. Bad enough you can stand all over him in the crease.

danmcn12 is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:10 PM
  #68
FinRuutu
Red Wins
 
FinRuutu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Helsinki
Country: Finland
Posts: 4,538
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by illpucks View Post
This is not solely my opinion, the play-by-play guy on CBC said there was a missed call. It's not about me vs the Penguins. I am simply calling out a play. I will call out a play if there is a missed call, not because I dislike a team.
Sure its not just your opinion. Many Rangers fans will agree with you, maybe even few "professionals". But as many that agree with you disagrees with you.

It wouldn't be very wise to agree with you or we both would be wrong.

Sure Malkin's stick touches Lundqvist's glove but thats not illegal, he didn't interfere his capability of making a save, which you can clearly see from the replays. Also its Lundqvist that makes the initial contact with Malkin's stick who saw that puck was going in anyway. Puck was in play at all times.

Good goal.

FinRuutu is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:10 PM
  #69
BigDaddyLurch
Deleted Posts Leader
 
BigDaddyLurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Exiled from Reality
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,878
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vokouna Maattata View Post
Yes it was. Malkin was going for the puck.
...just cuz he was going for the puck doesn't make it "incidental contact"...he impeded Lundqvist's ability to react to the loose puck...

BigDaddyLurch is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:12 PM
  #70
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 34,625
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...just cuz he was going for the puck doesn't make it "incidental contact"...he impeded Lundqvist's ability to react to the loose puck...
thats what incidental contact is. Its like goalie interference, but not bad enough to be a penalty. And the rebound rule posted applies in that case.

69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.

Ogrezilla is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:12 PM
  #71
Vokouna Maattata
#PouliotWatch2015
 
Vokouna Maattata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14,020
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by danmcn12 View Post
Interference. Can't hit the goalie. Period. Bad enough you can stand all over him in the crease.
Read rule 69.6 Rebounds and Loose Pucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...just cuz he was going for the puck doesn't make it "incidental contact"...he impeded Lundqvist's ability to react to the loose puck...
This is just false. How could he react to a puck that he had no idea where it was?

Vokouna Maattata is online now  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:13 PM
  #72
ByeBye
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,589
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...just cuz he was going for the puck doesn't make it "incidental contact"...he impeded Lundqvist's ability to react to the loose puck...
He impeded with Lundqvist's ability to raise his glove even higher which had nothing to do with making a save.

ByeBye is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:17 PM
  #73
illpucks
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,925
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuernberger View Post
He impeded with Lundqvist's ability to raise his glove even higher which had nothing to do with making a save.
It affected his positioning. Whether the glove was needed to make the save is not the point. His glove was made contact with, which affected his ability to make a play on the puck.

illpucks is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:18 PM
  #74
ByeBye
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,589
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by illpucks View Post
It affected his positioning. Whether the glove was needed to make the save is not the point. His glove was made contact with which affected his ability to make a play on the puck.
I'm sure you believe that.

ByeBye is offline  
Old
05-02-2014, 09:19 PM
  #75
Vokouna Maattata
#PouliotWatch2015
 
Vokouna Maattata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14,020
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by illpucks View Post
It affected his positioning. Whether the glove was needed to make the save is not the point. His glove was made contact with, which affected his ability to make a play on the puck.
Read rule 69.6 that has been posted like 5 times in here. You're wrong, just give it up.

Vokouna Maattata is online now  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.