HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Nyr - pit

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-14-2014, 12:09 AM
  #1
NHL Fanatik*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,281
vCash: 500
Nyr - pit

Malkin and Fleury

For

Lundqvist and Richards

NHL Fanatik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 12:10 AM
  #2
Matt4776
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Matt4776's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,199
vCash: 143
Uh? No?

Matt4776 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 12:37 AM
  #3
DearDiary
Registered User
 
DearDiary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,272
vCash: 964
Joke topic?

No way does that package get you Malkin, let alone adding Fluery

DearDiary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 12:46 AM
  #4
pensfan7477
Danny Tanner
 
pensfan7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,418
vCash: 500
What the **** is this. LOOOOOL

pensfan7477 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 12:46 AM
  #5
Dragon Priest
Elvenlegions
 
Dragon Priest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Metalheaven
Country: United States
Posts: 2,250
vCash: 500
Nope...

Dragon Priest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 12:48 AM
  #6
mymerlincat
Registered User
 
mymerlincat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,943
vCash: 500
I can't tell if you are serious or not.

mymerlincat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 12:57 AM
  #7
NHL Fanatik*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,281
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DearDiary View Post
Joke topic?

No way does that package get you Malkin, let alone adding Fluery
The best goalie in the world doesn't get you the secod best center in the league? Explain that to me.

And it wasn't meant to be serious, I threw it out there for feedback.

NHL Fanatik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 12:58 AM
  #8
NHL Fanatik*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,281
vCash: 500
So you're telling me Pittsburgh's problem in net doesn't entice some thought into this? I assure you I wouldn't trade Lundqvist for Malkin if I was NY, so whoever said the other way around, I guess Fleury gets the job done (not)

NHL Fanatik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 01:01 AM
  #9
pensfan7477
Danny Tanner
 
pensfan7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,418
vCash: 500
Lundqvist doesn't get us over the hump ESPECIALLY at the price of Malkin. Brad ****ing Richards is going to be bought out why the **** would the Pens do this? WHY? It makes them SIGNIFICANTLY worse.

pensfan7477 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 01:03 AM
  #10
matt1396
Registered User
 
matt1396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,736
vCash: 500
This is horrific

matt1396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 01:23 AM
  #11
NHL Fanatik*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,281
vCash: 500
I guess Pitt will continue to believe Fleury is the one. That's unfortunate.

NHL Fanatik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 01:24 AM
  #12
NHL Fanatik*
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,281
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pensfan7477 View Post
Lundqvist doesn't get us over the hump ESPECIALLY at the price of Malkin. Brad ****ing Richards is going to be bought out why the **** would the Pens do this? WHY? It makes them SIGNIFICANTLY worse.
Pretty sure you put Lundqvist in net and take out malkin, and Pitt is in the cup. But hey, guess Fleury's chokes make for good tv, no?

NHL Fanatik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 01:27 AM
  #13
AFTeRMaTH*
41st-78th-17th-11th
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Country: United States
Posts: 2,287
vCash: 500
Fleury FTL! Go Pens!

AFTeRMaTH* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 02:24 AM
  #14
Country Mac
Violent Gents Unite
 
Country Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: Israel
Posts: 1,192
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilish Predator View Post
I guess Pitt will continue to believe Fleury is the one. That's unfortunate.
If you think we wouldn't do this because we'd be losing FLEURY then you're delusional. The difference between Fleury and Lundquist<<<<<the difference between Malkin and CBO Richards.

Country Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 02:39 AM
  #15
Machinehead
Moderator
Because Rongos
 
Machinehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Land of no Defense
Country: United States
Posts: 44,903
vCash: 50
I wouldn't trade Lundqvist for anyone.

__________________
"Every thread needs a Brassard gif"

Stop being so salty
Machinehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 03:20 AM
  #16
Virtanev
+
 
Virtanev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,735
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilish Predator View Post
Pretty sure you put Lundqvist in net and take out malkin, and Pitt is in the cup. But hey, guess Fleury's chokes make for good tv, no?
No, they aren't.

Pittsburgh laughs and hangs up, people need to realize goalies aren't worth the same as skaters.

__________________


OP Genasis: have you guys thought people are starting to get tired of Team Curl's antics? 21:56

Virtanev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 04:10 AM
  #17
buckleupbaby
Registered User
 
buckleupbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 127
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilish Predator View Post
The best goalie in the world doesn't get you the secod best center in the league? Explain that to me.

And it wasn't meant to be serious, I threw it out there for feedback.
that really doenst need any explanation. And if you really think the rangers wouldnt trade lundquist for malkin then you terribly undervalue malkin.

buckleupbaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 04:11 AM
  #18
buckleupbaby
Registered User
 
buckleupbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 127
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilish Predator View Post
Pretty sure you put Lundqvist in net and take out malkin, and Pitt is in the cup. But hey, guess Fleury's chokes make for good tv, no?
have you seen a pens playoff game this year? we struggled to score...yeah taking out the second best forward makes a lot of sence...

buckleupbaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 05:47 AM
  #19
goldy2266
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 126
vCash: 500
Brutal trade!!

Richards will be bought out! End of story on him.....

I don't even know where to start for the rest of it..... (Malkin for lundqvist) Look back on the last NYR/Pitts trade proposal and see how that worked out!!

No way and in before lock!

goldy2266 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 06:01 AM
  #20
penguins2946*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 21,950
vCash: 500
So a buyout candidate that got demoted to the 4th line and the best goalie in the NHL for an average starting goalie and arguably the best player in the NHL? Not a chance. Fleury is more valuable than Richards and Malkin is more valuable than Lundqvist. Just awful.

penguins2946* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 06:29 AM
  #21
wej20
Registered User
 
wej20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Swansea,UK
Country: Wales
Posts: 23,470
vCash: 500
Can the Pens even buyout Richards?


Last edited by wej20: 06-14-2014 at 07:20 AM.
wej20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 06:33 AM
  #22
BruinLVGA
Registered User
 
BruinLVGA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,403
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilish Predator View Post
Malkin and Fleury

For

Lundqvist and Richards
In all honesty, I wouldn't do this value-wise from the Pens point of view as it seems NY should add.
But a Pens team with Lundquist in net would immediately become way more a serious contender than now. The loss of Malkin would be huge, ok. But I think the Pens, by packaging picks n prospects, could make a deal to get a very good player that could mitigate Malkin's loss. At that point, Pens would become favorites in the East, imo. So I hope it won't ever happen!!!! :p

NYR without Lunquist would be back a couple of steps from where they are as I believe you must build a winning team starting with a great goalie (Fleury for me is ok. Though I am not sure he still has it in him to be able to win it all again). So even NY, while tempted, wouldn't probably do it.

What an intriguing trade though...

BruinLVGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 07:01 AM
  #23
goldy2266
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 126
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wej20 View Post
Wouldn't the Pens not be able to buyout Richards?
Oh well that makes even more sense then..... We trade Malkin and Fluery for Lundquist and buyout Richards...... The pens should add then if they have the opportunity to take Richards off the rangers hands..... Nutty line of reasoning!!

Richards has negative value due to his contract and age..... No way we make the Rangers a younger stronger team!!!

Go get Stamkos and Bishop or Toews and Crawford or another primer player with it's teams starting goalie and see how many fan bases say yeah I'll take your ageing goalie (all be it the top one in the league for now) and buyout player........ Not happening!!??

Tampa says no
Chicago says no
Pittsburgh says no...... We can sign Miller or Brodure and still keep Malkin in his prime!!

goldy2266 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 07:29 AM
  #24
Ogelthorpe
Who do you play for?
 
Ogelthorpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 1,941
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilish Predator View Post
The best goalie in the world doesn't get you the secod best center in the league? Explain that to me.

And it wasn't meant to be serious, I threw it out there for feedback.
The Pens won a cup with Fleury, and lost in the final in another one. Malkin won the Conn Smythe, Art Ross, etc.

The gap from Hank to Fleury is non existent when MAF is on his game, and Malkin is light years ahead of Richards.

Ogelthorpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2014, 07:37 AM
  #25
Sour Shoes
lol u mad cam?
 
Sour Shoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Home of Black+Gold
Posts: 2,474
vCash: 500
malkin is untouchable.

citing the gretzky trade is foolish.

Sour Shoes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.