HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Colorado Avalanche
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Where do y'all see the AVs this year?

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-28-2005, 07:04 PM
  #1
expatriated_texan
Freaking Loopy
 
expatriated_texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Country: United States
Posts: 7,386
vCash: 50
Where do y'all see the AVs this year?

Are we winning the President's Trophy?...I don't think so...

Are we finishing first in the division?...I also don't think so...

Are we making it into the playoffs? Hell yeah!

Could everyone saying we are a dark-horse help us?...You bet'cha!

Do we have the proper mix of talent, grit and determination?...Talk to me in a few months? I'm really looking forward to seeing Antti and Ian I think they could be huge upgrades on the lower lines. I'm really concerned about a second line winger. I'd rather see Joe center that line with Konowalchuk than have the JAM line reunited. I don't like the idea of having all our eggs in one basket...That's why I like seeing Tangauy returned to his natural center position.

expatriated_texan is offline  
Old
09-29-2005, 01:52 AM
  #2
Av-merican
@Av_merican
 
Av-merican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Frozen Wasteland
Country: Scotland
Posts: 10,723
vCash: 500
My main concern going into the season is the power play. But Granato, if nothing else, seems to know how to put a great power play unit together, so he's good for something at least.

I still think we're better than the Oilers, but we'll have a hard time against the Canucks without our patented Nucks-killer Hejduk in the lineup. The Flames will also be tough as hell. We'll make the playoffs, but probably end up 3rd in the division at best.

One wildcard will be Minnesota, no pun intended. Somehow I think they'll be an unpleasant surprise. We've always seemed to struggle against them in the past, and it should be no different now.

Av-merican is offline  
Old
09-29-2005, 06:22 PM
  #3
dwkdnvr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
vCash: 500
Not many folks jumping on this one....

I'm pretty much in line with the first two posts. In many respects I like what the team has done with a very limited budget, but we're definately going to be in tough in the NW. While I think that if all the stars aligned we have the personnel to take the division, I highly doubt it. I think we're looking at 2nd/3rd in the division. This should be good for somewhere between 5th and 8th in the conference.

The big question are the 2nd line and whether we have enough D that will adapt to the new game - we have experience but we may be a bit slower than I'd like.

dwkdnvr is offline  
Old
09-30-2005, 01:36 AM
  #4
Joey13
Registered User
 
Joey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 434
vCash: 500
Again, I think 3rd in the Division (Calgary and Vancouver), 7th in the Conference, and the 1st round ***-hammer from the Sharks.

Depth is great, but I see an average defense, spotty goal scoring (shootouts look troubling), and not enough youth and speed which seems to be what is needed under the new rules.

Joey13 is offline  
Old
09-30-2005, 08:18 AM
  #5
Colorado Avalanche
Registered User
 
Colorado Avalanche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lieto
Country: Finland
Posts: 15,467
vCash: 500
I'm not realistic, if i cheer for team, they will always win stanley cup, no matter how much they sucks.

Colorado Avalanche is offline  
Old
09-30-2005, 10:48 AM
  #6
Colorado Sports Fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver, Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 5,210
vCash: 500
2nd in the Division, 5th in the conference, Exit in the 2nd Round(7 Games) or the WCF.

Colorado Sports Fan is offline  
Old
09-30-2005, 11:03 PM
  #7
Yayo
 
Yayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,938
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey13
Again, I think 3rd in the Division (Calgary and Vancouver), 7th in the Conference, and the 1st round ***-hammer from the Sharks.

Depth is great, but I see an average defense, spotty goal scoring (shootouts look troubling), and not enough youth and speed which seems to be what is needed under the new rules.
I just don't see what the emphasis on pre-season shootouts is.

Yayo is offline  
Old
10-01-2005, 05:34 AM
  #8
El_Loco_Avs
Registered User
 
El_Loco_Avs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 7,894
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul755
2nd in the Division, 5th in the conference, Exit in the 2nd Round(7 Games) or the WCF.

hm... this sounds likely.

El_Loco_Avs is offline  
Old
10-01-2005, 07:16 AM
  #9
PapaBear*
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,063
vCash: 500
Is Sakic still gonna play the point on the PP? How will it look?

Tanguay-Turgeon-Hejduk
Blake-Sakic

?

or move Tanguay to C role, and put Svatos on the LW (I like this better. Gives strong supporting center for the 2nd PP.

Brunette-Turgeon-Konowalchuk/Wolski
Liles-Brisebois

PapaBear* is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.