HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

No PK time for Lacouture?

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-17-2003, 07:55 AM
  #1
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,473
vCash: 500
No PK time for Lacouture?

interesting given the fact that the Rangers spent so much time on the PK. At a minimum, I thought Lacouture should get ome time to at least rest a body. And personally, I think Lacouture should be taking a regular shift on the PK. Although, even with all the specialty team time, the forward with the least amount of ice time got nearly 8 minutes. That's a step in the right direction.

Fletch is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 08:00 AM
  #2
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,807
vCash: 500
Speaking of Lacouture, isn't it about time that he went back to the 4th line and Barnaby got a chance to play w/ Holik & Lundmark?

True Blue is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 08:02 AM
  #3
Lundyfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 338
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Lundyfan
Lundmark had been really good on the PK. I'd rather see him there than Dan. And yes, I'd like to see Barns on the line with Holik and Lundy too.

Lundyfan is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 08:09 AM
  #4
#37-#93-#27*
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 3,079
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to #37-#93-#27*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundyfan
Lundmark had been really good on the PK. I'd rather see him there than Dan. And yes, I'd like to see Barns on the line with Holik and Lundy too.
Yea Lundmark looked real good. I guess he took Lac's spot. I'd rather see Lacouture on the PK then Messier though. What the hell is Messier doing killing a 5 on 3?!

#37-#93-#27* is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 08:12 AM
  #5
Lundyfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 338
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Lundyfan
As long as Mess puts on skates you know he's going to get ice time. Did I hear JD say last night that Mess was bothered by a sore neck? If so, terrific, 3 games in and he's already getting hurt....

Lundyfan is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 08:55 AM
  #6
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 30,655
vCash: 500
Awards:
I'd argue that if Lacouture is not going to play on the PK, there's little reason for him to dress every game.

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 08:56 AM
  #7
RANGER#11
Registered User
 
RANGER#11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Norfolk, New York
Posts: 642
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lundyfan
Lundmark had been really good on the PK. I'd rather see him there than Dan. And yes, I'd like to see Barns on the line with Holik and Lundy too.
I also agree it is time to give Barnaby a shot.

RANGER#11 is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 09:21 AM
  #8
Melrose_Jr.
Registered User
 
Melrose_Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Country: United States
Posts: 10,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway
I'd argue that if Lacouture is not going to play on the PK, there's little reason for him to dress every game.
Absolutely.

Holik's killing penalties, LaCouture isn't. Does anyone know what the hell is going on behind the Ranger bench?

Melrose_Jr. is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 10:08 AM
  #9
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,807
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melrose_Jr.
Does anyone know what the hell is going on behind the Ranger bench?
Not really. There are several questions here.
1. Why is Holik's line NOT playing against other teams' top lines?
2. Why is Lacouture not killing penalties and BOTH Holik & Messier are? Killing penalties was never Holik's forte in NJ. He NEVER did it. And why oh why, is Jurrasic Mark's carcass out there for the PK?
3. Why is Mess getting close to 16 minutes per game, AGAIN? Didn't Sather say that Mess is a 4th line player? Some 4th liner. Got nearly 18 minutes against Columbus and nearly 16 again last night.
4. What function does Rucinsky serve?
5. Why are the ADRD still on the team?
6. Why is Barnaby NOT on the 3rd line and on the 4th?
7. What is Poti doing out there on the PK?

True Blue is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 10:30 AM
  #10
Brooklyn Ranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn, of course
Posts: 8,602
vCash: 500
What has LaCouture done to deserve any ice time? He's been invisible since the start of the season. I wouldn't complain at all if he were benched.

Brooklyn Ranger is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 11:46 AM
  #11
Davisian
Registered User
 
Davisian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 6,079
vCash: 500
I'd agree with you Brook, but I still think he should be on a regular PK unit as long as he's in the lineup.. Especially in lieu of Holik.. I do think Mess still does a good job killing them off, so I'm not so dissapointed in his PK time, its his regular strength time I have a problem with.. But again, that line has been outplaying Holik's so its understandable to a point..

I'm all for Barnaby taking Lac's spot, and giving Mess's line less time, but they still have to earn it..

Davisian is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 11:50 AM
  #12
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,807
vCash: 500
Is it just me or is anyone else getting the feeling that Lacoutre's place in the lineup (on the 3rd line, whereas if he was not in the lineup, Barnaby could play the 3rd while either Keefe or Scott got a crack at the 4th) is cemented becuase he is an original Sather pick from the Edmonton days?

True Blue is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 01:55 PM
  #13
Edge
Kris King's Ghost
 
Edge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Amish Paradise
Country: United States
Posts: 13,890
vCash: 500
i dont think it's "cememter" per say but i def. think it gives him a few more chances than it would to say Keefe or Lundmark.

Edge is offline  
Old
10-17-2003, 06:49 PM
  #14
Brooklyn Ranger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn, of course
Posts: 8,602
vCash: 500
If I recall correctly, didn't Sather say after the Kovalev trade that he had insisted on getting LaCouture? And, when he's playing his game, he does bring something that the Rangers need on the ice. Unfortunately, he seems to have forgotten what that was between pre-season and the regular season. And I would definitely switch him with Barnaby. LaCouture played well with Messier last year and Holik needs something to get him going (I would suggest a heart transplant, but the recovery time is too long). Maybe Barnaby can spark Holik's line at even strength.

As for playing LaCouture on the PK--I certainly would, but Sather seems to like to play two players from the same line on the PK, rather than mixing and matching. I seriously doubt we would ever see a PK pair of Lundmark and LaCouture--Sather would not be willing to let Lundmark take so many defensive zone draws. Not that Holik has been so great in that department either. On the other hand, Messier and LaCouture also killed penalties last year....

Brooklyn Ranger is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.