HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

No Salary cap?

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-19-2003, 06:00 AM
  #1
Yanner39
Registered User
 
Yanner39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,334
vCash: 500
No Salary cap?

http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam031019/nhl_cba-sun.html

I think this may be a good compromise although I don't know if the money distributed to the poorer teams will be enough.

Also, I think the NHLPA may look at this as a deterent for big market teams to spend $$ and may then not agree with it.

My opinion is that if a team has enough cash to spend say $15M over the "cap" of $40M, they probably have $15M to distribute to teams like Edm, Cgy, Nsh, Minny, etc. I like the concept of team like Edm having to spend $30M on their own.

Any thoughts?

Yanner39 is offline  
Old
10-19-2003, 06:20 AM
  #2
ZIM
Guest
 
Country:
Posts: n/a
vCash:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. van Nostrin
I like the concept of team like Edm having to spend $30M on their own.

Any thoughts?
The NBA has a similar rule (team has to spend minimum of $30M). Ask the LA Clippers how this works. Bad management in their case isn't corrected by minimum spending rules.

I hope that there is no salary cap. The cap has ruined the NFL by making it impossible to build and maintain a team. The NFL is more competitive now but your home team is only viable for a couple of years and then you have to rebuild.

 
Old
10-19-2003, 09:49 AM
  #3
kraigus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,173
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to kraigus Send a message via MSN to kraigus
The part that got me thinking it might be pie in the sky rather than something he'd heard rumours about was this:

"A governor has suggested the NHL try to get the percentage cut so that teams can keep players who may not deserve raises.

It could benefit the players because teams then might not be so quick to walk away from contracts."

Pardon? I don't recall a lot of teams walking away from contracts, but perhaps my memory is poor on this subject. I think generally speaking, RFAs have been tendered qualifying offers, and that's that. There've been a few arbitration walk-aways, but even those are rare - Boston twice and Washington once, isn't it?

I kind of like the idea, but is it the best solution?

kraigus is offline  
Old
10-19-2003, 10:49 AM
  #4
thome_26
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,860
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to thome_26
I also agree with the NFLs cap system - it is brutal. It's almost like a bunch of junior teams where you're good for two years, bad for two years, etc. I would like to see a VERY VERY VERY VERY hard luxury tax - that would see teams pay dollar for dollar what they spend over 40. Then teams that are decided to be small market teams would recieve that amount. BUT I think the most important thing is to find a way that equalizes canadian teams dollar to the Americans - I mean we've all talked alot about how much of a difference the 7-9 cents that our dollar has gained on that of the States will make. Well imagine if they had an equaliztion plan!! Pretend that all of a sudden Alberta used american currency (pray that that day never comes!) and we were on par with the currency! We'd be making millions - which would in turn allow us to spend closer to what the other teams spend.

thome_26 is offline  
Old
10-19-2003, 10:50 AM
  #5
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,646
vCash: 500
I've always been against a straight-up cap. Especially at $31 mil. The $40 mil proposal is alot better, allows teams to continue to build, distributes income, and assures teams have to spend a certain amount. I'd also like currency equalization, but I can't see that happening. The luxury tax format rewards good management, in that you can keep your up and coming stars, unlike the NFL where players have to be released and so on every year for nothing.

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline  
Old
10-19-2003, 11:19 AM
  #6
Asiaoil
Registered User
 
Asiaoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Country: Thailand
Posts: 5,259
vCash: 500
An NBA style agreement works for me:

- a soft cap with luxury tax that allows you to keep your players but really punishes teams that make mistakes with big contracts. Bad contracts limit your ability to sign free agents (if you are above the soft cap) and this really punishes bad management along with the luxury tax.

- a reasonable profit sharing arrangement that treats players as partners. NBA players even have to give money back to the owners if their share of revenues exceeds the agreed level.

Asiaoil is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.