HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Palat

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-16-2017, 10:43 PM
  #1
H a w k s
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,121
vCash: 500
Palat

I don't see him listed a potential trade target here the bolts also still have to sign Johnson and Drouin

Is he available now or will he be a pre expansion trade?

H a w k s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 10:45 PM
  #2
boltsfan9186
Registered User
 
boltsfan9186's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tampa
Country: United States
Posts: 5,833
vCash: 50
I don't think trading Palat is a good idea, because Killorn will likely be picked in expansion and then who is the 2nd line LW?

boltsfan9186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 10:46 PM
  #3
dechire
Janmark Enthusiast
 
dechire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: inconnu
Posts: 13,265
vCash: 50
He's available if someone wants to pay a premium for him. He's not available for a bunch of whatever pieces.

dechire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 11:19 PM
  #4
dracom
Registered User
 
dracom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver, WA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,677
vCash: 500
Vatanen for Palat would help both teams I believe.

dracom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 11:27 PM
  #5
Peter Griffin
Registered User
 
Peter Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 28,093
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dracom View Post
Vatanen for Palat would help both teams I believe.
Except for Vatanen's nearly $5M cap hit, would be hard for Tampa to fit in going forward.

Peter Griffin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 11:29 PM
  #6
BigDaddyLurch
#DaFoxholeIzDead
 
BigDaddyLurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Out of the Foxhole
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,351
vCash: 500
...realistically, what would the Bolts ask for from the Habs for Palat??...would Juulsen + 1st + Emelin be a realistic start or would the Habs need to add sizeably more??...

BigDaddyLurch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 11:29 PM
  #7
dracom
Registered User
 
dracom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver, WA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,677
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Griffin View Post
Except for Vatanen's nearly $5M cap hit, would be hard for Tampa to fit in going forward.
I mean sure, if you want to let little things like the salary cap get in the way.

dracom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 11:38 PM
  #8
JoVel
Registered User
 
JoVel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Finland
Country: Finland
Posts: 1,166
vCash: 500
If both teams can make it work cap-wise, I would love a Palat for Vatanen deal. Tampa needs that top 4 RHD pretty badly.

JoVel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2017, 11:43 PM
  #9
berglund
go
 
berglund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nova Scotia
Country: Sri Lanka
Posts: 74,068
vCash: 50
They shouldnt move him

__________________
Follow me on Twitter @BluesIn4
berglund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 12:32 AM
  #10
The Great Pateryn
Protect Da Deficit
 
The Great Pateryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7,981
vCash: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...realistically, what would the Bolts ask for from the Habs for Palat??...would Juulsen + 1st + Emelin be a realistic start or would the Habs need to add sizeably more??...
Sergachev and Juulsen are a no go. You can have any other prospect though.

The Great Pateryn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 12:39 AM
  #11
bossram
Registered User
 
bossram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,348
vCash: 500
Bolts should probably look at moving Johnson before Palat.

bossram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 02:35 AM
  #12
Ctrain2k
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 125
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossram View Post
Bolts should probably look at moving Johnson before Palat.
They need Johnson really bad, their centre depth is horrible without johnson becuase stammer is always hurt

Ctrain2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 02:44 AM
  #13
Rschmitz
Yzermaned
 
Rschmitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tampa Bay
Country: United States
Posts: 6,994
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ctrain2k View Post

They need Johnson really bad, their centre depth is horrible without johnson becuase stammer is always hurt
Filppula? Namestnikov? Point? Can afford the loss of Johnson if the return is good

Rschmitz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 03:56 AM
  #14
C77
Registered User
 
C77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Junior's Farm
Country: United States
Posts: 14,031
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by boltsfan9186 View Post
I don't think trading Palat is a good idea, because Killorn will likely be picked in expansion and then who is the 2nd line LW?
Do you think that TB would explore trading Killorn given that he would be taken in the draft?

You could move him for a package that included a 4th line forward signed through next season that meets the expansion requirements.

I am a B's fan and like Killorn quite a bit. Deal could be made....combination of pick/prospect(s) and 4th liner (Nash) to satisfy expansion draft.

I think Vegas in the end is going to get very little at the forward position, and Yzerman would be foolish to let Killorn get away for nothing. Players who meet the criteria for draft will be commodities to teams like Tampa.

C77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 04:01 AM
  #15
Halla
Registered User
 
Halla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,343
vCash: 500
A Palat for Vatanen deal makes too much sense

Halla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 04:06 AM
  #16
Halla
Registered User
 
Halla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Great Pateryn View Post
Sergachev and Juulsen are a no go. You can have any other prospect though.
you wouldnt move juulsen in a deal to get palat?

Halla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 04:12 AM
  #17
Rschmitz
Yzermaned
 
Rschmitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tampa Bay
Country: United States
Posts: 6,994
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by C77 View Post
Do you think that TB would explore trading Killorn given that he would be taken in the draft?

You could move him for a package that included a 4th line forward signed through next season that meets the expansion requirements.

I am a B's fan and like Killorn quite a bit. Deal could be made....combination of pick/prospect(s) and 4th liner (Nash) to satisfy expansion draft.

I think Vegas in the end is going to get very little at the forward position, and Yzerman would be foolish to let Killorn get away for nothing. Players who meet the criteria for draft will be commodities to teams like Tampa.
All Yzerman has to do is trade Filppula

Rschmitz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 05:15 AM
  #18
Palat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 937
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rschmitz View Post
Filppula? Namestnikov? Point? Can afford the loss of Johnson if the return is good
Your statement about why we should trade Johnson is the best possible statement of why we SHOULD NOT trade Johnson. Point is the only one who may be able to slot into 2c but we don't know when that will be.

Palat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 05:24 AM
  #19
C77
Registered User
 
C77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Junior's Farm
Country: United States
Posts: 14,031
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rschmitz View Post
All Yzerman has to do is trade Filppula
You think that is enough with their RFA's coming up?

C77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:01 AM
  #20
TheLegend27
Drouin is bae
 
TheLegend27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tampa
Country: United States
Posts: 4,052
vCash: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by boltsfan9186 View Post
I don't think trading Palat is a good idea, because Killorn will likely be picked in expansion and then who is the 2nd line LW?
Meet Nikita Gusev.

TheLegend27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:02 AM
  #21
TheLegend27
Drouin is bae
 
TheLegend27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tampa
Country: United States
Posts: 4,052
vCash: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halla View Post
A Palat for Vatanen deal makes too much sense
Fowler or bust.

TheLegend27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:03 AM
  #22
TheLegend27
Drouin is bae
 
TheLegend27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tampa
Country: United States
Posts: 4,052
vCash: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDaddyLurch View Post
...realistically, what would the Bolts ask for from the Habs for Palat??...would Juulsen + 1st + Emelin be a realistic start or would the Habs need to add sizeably more??...
I don't want Emelin, he sucks.

TheLegend27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:41 AM
  #23
jboyd919
Registered User
 
jboyd919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 316
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by boltsfan9186 View Post
I don't think trading Palat is a good idea, because Killorn will likely be picked in expansion and then who is the 2nd line LW?
I hope Vegas takes Namestnikov and sticks the Lightning with Killorn's garbage contract lol

jboyd919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 07:46 AM
  #24
jboyd919
Registered User
 
jboyd919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 316
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palat View Post
Your statement about why we should trade Johnson is the best possible statement of why we SHOULD NOT trade Johnson. Point is the only one who may be able to slot into 2c but we don't know when that will be.
lol nah Namestnikov can slot in 2C.

Drouin-Stammer-Kuch
Palat-Namestnikov-Point
Paquette-Filp-Callahan
Erne-FA (or Stephens or Peca)-Brown

Trade Johnson for D help
Killorn claimed by Vegas


Last edited by jboyd919: 02-17-2017 at 07:51 AM.
jboyd919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2017, 08:38 AM
  #25
Butchered
I'm with Kuch
 
Butchered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Country: United States
Posts: 6,194
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Butchered
Johnson is absolutely the one dealt if it's between him and Palat, but I disagree that Namestnikov can play 2C right now. He's been really bad this year. The whole team has been bad to be totally fair, but he's very visibly bad.

The most ideal situation would be for TB to sign Nikita Gusev. He'd slot in at 2nd line LW, and I'd put him with Point and Kuchverov on that line. Smallllllllllllllllll, but a ton of speed and skill. Kucherov and Gusev would probably click pretty well together despite not having played together in a long time.

Assuming Killorn gets picked up by Vegas, this would be absolutely perfect.

Butchered is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.