HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

+/- : Plus player every season of a career?

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-28-2006, 11:34 AM
  #1
Chili
Registered User
 
Chili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la Belle Province
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 2,936
vCash: 500
+/- : Plus player every season of a career?

I know that the +/- stat is not a tell all stat. It is reflective more of the team than the player himself but I still find it interesting.

I'm curious how many players were able to be a plus player every year of their career.

I have found at least two, Bobby Orr and Larry Robinson. Al MacInnis was a plus player every season except his last, which only consisted of 3 games and a -1 so I give him an asterisk.

Unfortuneately the stat was not always kept so we don't know about great players of the past.

Check some great players of recent past here and you'll see they practically all had at least one minus season.

Edit: Add Bobby Clarke. Also, Peter Forsberg so far in his career.


Last edited by Chili: 02-28-2006 at 11:41 AM.
Chili is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 12:00 PM
  #2
John Flyers Fan
Registered User
 
John Flyers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 22,397
vCash: 500
Add Bill Barber.

Scott Stevens was never a minus, but did have one year where he was even.

John Flyers Fan is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 12:23 PM
  #3
Nols
Registered User
 
Nols's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,355
vCash: 500
Milan Hejduk (was even in 01-02) ???

Gretz was a + player in all the edmonton years.

Nols is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 12:48 PM
  #4
looooob
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,885
vCash: 500
not exactly a hall of famer, but one of my all time faves Craig Ramsay qualifies I think

I looked up Brad McCrimmon also...turns out he just misses (like alot of players I'm sure) but man that dude had an impressive career plus minus

edit: well I went on to look up about 20 names...alot of the guys are only minus players in their last, or second last year...in other words....some current players might be ok, if they are still in their prime...but if they hang on too long...whammo


Last edited by looooob: 02-28-2006 at 12:54 PM.
looooob is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 12:50 PM
  #5
JCD
Registered User
 
JCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country:
Posts: 14,570
vCash: 500
I know he is a minor player, but I found it impressive that Joe Reekie, despite playing on a host of bad teams (including the expansion Lightning) and never scoring so much as 20 points in a season, had only 2 minus seasons (a -2 and a -3) in his 900+ game, 16-year career.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/player...s?playerId=768

JCD is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 01:29 PM
  #6
Chili
Registered User
 
Chili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la Belle Province
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 2,936
vCash: 500
There are probably a bunch who had shorter careers (I notice Magnus Arvedsson is one).

Chili is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 02:48 PM
  #7
Heaton
Moderator
Holland = nomorecups
 
Heaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rochester, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 20,322
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Heaton
Lidstrom

Heaton is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 03:27 PM
  #8
HVPOLARBEARS19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Country: Israel
Posts: 2,055
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to HVPOLARBEARS19 Send a message via MSN to HVPOLARBEARS19
Forsberg hasn't yet...

HVPOLARBEARS19 is offline  
Old
02-28-2006, 04:43 PM
  #9
reckoning
Registered User
 
reckoning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,772
vCash: 500
Mario Tremblay
Rejean Houle

Jacques Lemaire never had a minus year, but had one even year.

Jean Ratelle, Yvan Cournoyer and Jacques LaPerriere all had only plus seasons, but played part of their career before the stat was kept.

reckoning is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 07:19 AM
  #10
Chili
Registered User
 
Chili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la Belle Province
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 2,936
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HVPOLARBEARS19
Forsberg hasn't yet...
According to these NHL stats he has been a plus player every year of his NHL career so far. Obviously that could change before the end of his career.

The one common thread I see with the players listed so far, they were all good two way players.

Chili is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 07:41 AM
  #11
Sens Rule
Registered User
 
Sens Rule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,703
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
According to these NHL stats he has been a plus player every year of his NHL career so far. Obviously that could change before the end of his career.

The one common thread I see with the players listed so far, they were all good two way players.
Also they all played on great teams their entire careers. The biggest reason by far.

Sens Rule is online now  
Old
03-01-2006, 07:50 AM
  #12
pnep
Registered User
 
pnep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Novosibirsk,Russia
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 2,491
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
I'm curious how many players were able to be a plus player every year of their career.
Player -- POS -- Last Season -- Years
===========================
Robinson Larry -- D -- 1992 -- 20
Clarke Bobby -- C -- 1984 -- 15
Ramsay Craig -- L -- 1985 -- 14
Ratelle Jean -- C -- 1981 -- 14
Dupont Andre -- D -- 1983 -- 13
LeClair John -- L -- 2003 -- 13
Barber Bill -- L -- 1984 -- 12
Cournoyer Yvan -- R -- 1979 -- 12
Lidstrom Nicklas -- D -- 2003 -- 12
Tremblay Mario -- R -- 1986 -- 12
Houle Rejean -- L -- 1983 -- 11
Orr Bobby -- D -- 1979 -- 11
Lindros Eric -- C -- 2003 -- 10
Fetisov Viachelsav -- D -- 1998 -- 9
Therien Chris -- D -- 2003 -- 9
Forsberg Peter -- C -- 2003 -- 8
Henderson Paul -- L -- 1980 -- 8
Mondou Pierre -- C -- 1985 -- 8
Richard Henri -- C -- 1975 -- 8
Laperriere Jacques -- D -- 1974 -- 7
Mahovlich Frank -- L -- 1974 -- 7
Arvedson Magnus -- L -- 2003 -- 6
Konstantinov Vladimir -- D -- 1997 -- 6
Stapleton Pat -- D -- 1973 -- 6


Last edited by pnep: 03-01-2006 at 09:55 PM.
pnep is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 08:05 AM
  #13
Chili
Registered User
 
Chili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la Belle Province
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 2,936
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnep
Player -- POS -- Last Season -- Years
=========================
Robinson Larry -- D -- 1992 -- 20
Clarke Bobby -- C -- 1984 -- 15
Ramsay Craig -- L -- 1985 -- 14
Ratelle Jean -- C -- 1981 -- 14
LeClair John -- L -- 2003 -- 13
Cournoyer Yvan -- R -- 1979 -- 12
Lidstrom Nicklas -- D -- 2003 -- 12
Houle Rejean -- L -- 1983 -- 11
Orr Bobby -- D -- 1979 -- 11
Lindros Eric -- C -- 2003 -- 10
Forsberg Peter -- C -- 2003 -- 8
Henderson Paul -- L -- 1980 -- 8
Richard Henri -- C -- 1975 -- 8
Laperriere Jacques -- D -- 1974 -- 7
Mahovlich Frank -- L -- 1974 -- 7
Arvedson Magnus -- L -- 2003 -- 6
Konstantinov Vladimir -- D -- 1997 -- 6
Stapleton Pat -- D -- 1973 -- 6
Kaberle Tomas -- D -- 2003 -- 5
Great job as always, thanks.

Chili is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 08:06 AM
  #14
Chili
Registered User
 
Chili's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la Belle Province
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 2,936
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cup2006sensrule
Also they all played on great teams their entire careers. The biggest reason by far.
No question of that at all, as I said in my first post it is more of a team stat than an individual one.

Chili is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 08:10 AM
  #15
pnep
Registered User
 
pnep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Novosibirsk,Russia
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 2,491
vCash: 500
Minus player every season of a career

Player -- POS -- Last Season -- Years
=============================
Croteau Gary -- L -- 1980 -- 12
Sullivan Mike -- L -- 2002 -- 11
Gardner Paul -- C -- 1986 -- 10
Holt Randy -- D -- 1984 -- 10
Huber Willie -- D -- 1988 -- 10
McLlwain Dave -- C -- 1997 -- 10
Delorme Ron -- C -- 1985 -- 9
Klassen Ralph -- C -- 1984 -- 9
Skriko Petri -- L -- 1993 -- 9
Stewart Bob -- D -- 1980 -- 9
Daigle Alexandre -- R -- 2003 -- 8
Gagne Paul -- L -- 1990 -- 8
Hogaboam Bill -- C -- 1980 -- 8
Kitchen Mike -- D -- 1984 -- 8
Patrick Craig -- R -- 1979 -- 8
Pavese Jim -- D -- 1989 -- 8
Polonich Dennis -- C -- 1983 -- 8
Quint Deron -- D -- 2003 -- 8
Terrion Greg -- L -- 1988 -- 8


Last edited by pnep: 03-01-2006 at 10:02 PM.
pnep is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 08:35 AM
  #16
reckoning
Registered User
 
reckoning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,772
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnep
Player -- POS -- Last Season -- Years
=========================
Robinson Larry -- D -- 1992 -- 20
Clarke Bobby -- C -- 1984 -- 15
Ramsay Craig -- L -- 1985 -- 14
Ratelle Jean -- C -- 1981 -- 14
Cournoyer Yvan -- R -- 1979 -- 12
Lidstrom Nicklas -- D -- 2003 -- 12
Houle Rejean -- L -- 1983 -- 11
Orr Bobby -- D -- 1979 -- 11
Lindros Eric -- C -- 2003 -- 10
Forsberg Peter -- C -- 2003 -- 8
Henderson Paul -- L -- 1980 -- 8
Richard Henri -- C -- 1975 -- 8
Laperriere Jacques -- D -- 1974 -- 7
Mahovlich Frank -- L -- 1974 -- 7
Arvedson Magnus -- L -- 2003 -- 6
Konstantinov Vladimir -- D -- 1997 -- 6
Stapleton Pat -- D -- 1973 -- 6
Kaberle Tomas -- D -- 2003 -- 5
Nice work as always Pnep. A few additions...

- As mentioned earlier, Bill Barber (12 yrs), and Mario Tremblay (12 yrs) had plus marks every season.

- Andre Dupont (13 yrs), Viacheslav Fetisov (9 yrs) and Pierre Mondou (8 yrs) also were +`s in every season.

- John LeClair (14 yrs) and Chris Therien (10 yrs) have perfect records so far, but will likely end this season.

- As for the other current streaks: Forsberg will easily make it this year, Lidstrom should as well, but it`s going to be close for Lindros, Arvedson and Kaberle.

- Like Stevens and Lemaire, Yvon Lambert and Keith Crowder never a minus year but had one even year.

Some notable players:

- Gretzky: plus his first 12 yrs, minus 6 of his last 8 yrs.
- Lemieux: 9 plus yrs, 6 minus yrs, 1 even. (will likely be minus this year too)
- Lafleur: plus his first 12 yrs, minus 4 of his last 5 yrs
- Messier: minus his first two yrs, plus 14 of his next 16 yrs, minus 6 of his last 7
- Bourque: plus his first 17(!!) yrs, minus 3 of his last 5
- Trottier: plus his first 12 yrs, minus 4 of his last 5

The trend seems to be that the minus years start to show up at the end of their careers.

reckoning is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 11:45 AM
  #17
Sens Rule
Registered User
 
Sens Rule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,703
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by reckoning
Some notable players:

- Gretzky: plus his first 12 yrs, minus 6 of his last 8 yrs.
- Lemieux: 9 plus yrs, 6 minus yrs, 1 even. (will likely be minus this year too)
- Lafleur: plus his first 12 yrs, minus 4 of his last 5 yrs
- Messier: minus his first two yrs, plus 14 of his next 16 yrs, minus 6 of his last 7
- Bourque: plus his first 17(!!) yrs, minus 3 of his last 5
- Trottier: plus his first 12 yrs, minus 4 of his last 5

The trend seems to be that the minus years start to show up at the end of their careers.
Again more a factor of the teams they played on. All those players except Trottier played on far worse teams at the end of their careers and were part of dynasties at the start. Trottier being an exception, he was a defensive forward on good teams at the end of his career when he no longer was a scorer. But he also faced the best teams top line as a defensive forward so that is the reason for the minus rating. Plus-minus isn't the best stat. Excellent defensive forwards on bad teams have minus ratings even though they often keep the other teams top line from scoring more than they usually do. Defensive forwards on good teams often have worse plus-minus than poor defensive forwards on good teams. Plus minus is interesting and can indicate some things about a player but is not generally a good stat to put alot of weight in as it can be decieving on many, many occasions.

Sens Rule is online now  
Old
03-01-2006, 01:08 PM
  #18
reckoning
Registered User
 
reckoning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,772
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cup2006sensrule
Again more a factor of the teams they played on. All those players except Trottier played on far worse teams at the end of their careers and were part of dynasties at the start. Trottier being an exception, he was a defensive forward on good teams at the end of his career when he no longer was a scorer. But he also faced the best teams top line as a defensive forward so that is the reason for the minus rating. Plus-minus isn't the best stat. Excellent defensive forwards on bad teams have minus ratings even though they often keep the other teams top line from scoring more than they usually do. Defensive forwards on good teams often have worse plus-minus than poor defensive forwards on good teams. Plus minus is interesting and can indicate some things about a player but is not generally a good stat to put alot of weight in as it can be decieving on many, many occasions.
You make some good points, but the fact is that all statistics are somewhat influenced by the team are somewhat influenced by the team a player plays on. For example, when Chico Resch got traded from the Islanders to the Rockies, his GAA went up. Was it he suddenly became a bad goalie? No, it was because the defence in front of him was a lot worse. Bernie Nicholls scored 70 goals in `89, but never hit 50 any other year. Was it a coincidence that that year happened to be the year he was teammates with Gretzky? Of course not. We don`t throw away all those statistics because of that though. We look at the whole picture, and use a little common sense.

No plus/minus isn`t the be-all and end-all; but it does tell a lot. As someone who watched a lot of Sabre games in the 70s and 80s, I can tell you that Craig Ramsay`s marks were not just because he played on a top team, but because he was one of the best two-way forwards in the game. Gil Perreault, a far weaker defensive player on the same team, always struggled in +/-. If somebody who never saw them play looked only at their point totals, they`d think that Perreault was infinitely better than Ramsay. +/- shows that Ramsay had value beyond just his goals and assists. The cool part about researching statistics is discovering that certain underrated, forgotten players were actually quite better than they got credit for.

The stat has its flaws. It`s more accurate to look at it as a % compared to the players teammates, and take into account the players role on the team and if he was likely matched against the top scorers, but it can tell you a lot when you look at someone`s entire career.

One other fact to consider: it`s easy to say the only reason Bobby Clarke or Bobby Orr had high +/- marks was because they were on great teams. It also has to be considered that Clarke and Orr were a big reason why their respective teams were so great.

To everybody who says +/- is a meaningless stat, take a look at pnep`s list of plus players and list of minus players. Which group of players would you rather have: Bobby Clarke or Gary Croteau? Larry Robinson or Bob Stewart? If it was completely random and meaningless, then both those lists would be equal.

reckoning is offline  
Old
03-01-2006, 03:24 PM
  #19
Czech Your Math
Registered User
 
Czech Your Math's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: bohemia
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 4,836
vCash: 500
It's useful, but not defining

Submitted for your consideration:

Mario Lemieux
career +115, playoffs +20

Ron Francis
career -10, playoffs +28

Jaromir Jagr
career +231, playoffs +29

Deducting Mario's first two and last three years (all minus): +199, +21
Deducting Francis' first four and last four years (7/8 minus): +103, +32

Only 90/91-00/01 (Jagr's years with Penguins):

Lemieux +140, +21
Jagr +207, +27

Only 90/91-97/98 (Francis' years with Penguins):

Lemieux +125, +17
Francis +70, +28
Jagr +146, +17

Only years Lemieux played (90/91-93/94, 95/96-96/97, 00/01):

Lemieux +140, +21
Jagr +125, +13

Only years Francis & Lemieux played (90/91-93/94, 95/96-96/97):

Lemieux +125, +17
Francis +28, +20
Jagr +106, +9

Only years Lemieux played majority of regular season (91/92-92/93, 95/96-96/97):

Lemieux +119, +7
Francis +31, +9
Jagr +95, +10

Only years Francis played majority of regular season (91/92-97/98):

Lemieux +117, +3
Francis +70, +15
Jagr +150, +15

Considering that Jagr didn't really hit full stride until at least 92/93 (third season), my conclusion is that he held his own on a plus/minus basis with Lemieux (a legend) and Francis (a legend, or at least great player known for playing pretty good defense) while on the same teams (and therefore much more easily comparable).

It's much more difficult to compare players on different teams, especially when one has a Dryden/Robinson or Brodeur/Stevens type defense, and the other is on a mediocre (or worse) defensive team.

Czech Your Math is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.