HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Buffalo Sabres
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

who gets drafted?

View Poll Results: who is gone?
Deslauriers 0 0%
Moulson 17 14.29%
Carrier 51 42.86%
Kea 0 0%
Bogosian 39 32.77%
Gorges 0 0%
Falk 0 0%
Austin 0 0%
Ullmark 11 9.24%
random other 1 0.84%
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-19-2017, 04:27 AM
  #1
wunderpanda
enter PHo Botts
 
wunderpanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: outside the hive
Posts: 4,843
vCash: 500
who gets drafted?

Who do you think the Sabres lose to Vegas?


*Not sure if a protected or exempt player could be traded as a replacement to an exposed player, but Moulson & a 3rd still counts as Moulson (not other). Moulson + another player counts as other.

**included unsigned RFA but not the UFA (as listed on capfriendly)


Last edited by wunderpanda: 06-19-2017 at 04:37 AM.
wunderpanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 04:55 AM
  #2
Sabreality
Registered User
 
Sabreality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: Scotland
Posts: 5,454
vCash: 50
Kulikov

Sabreality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 04:57 AM
  #3
Zeb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: SFO
Country: United States
Posts: 67
vCash: 500
Ullmark or Bogosian

Zeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 05:07 AM
  #4
kritter65
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Buffalo
Country: United States
Posts: 43
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wunderpanda View Post
Who do you think the Sabres lose to Vegas?


*Not sure if a protected or exempt player could be traded as a replacement to an exposed player, but Moulson & a 3rd still counts as Moulson (not other). Moulson + another player counts as other.

**included unsigned RFA but not the UFA (as listed on capfriendly)
Ullmark - because I don't want him to be the one and I have crappy luck.

kritter65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 06:17 AM
  #5
skipjack
Registered User
 
skipjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 55
vCash: 500
Carrier.

skipjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 06:22 AM
  #6
jc17
Registered User
 
jc17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,291
vCash: 90
Bogosian.

I just really don't see Carrier having a ton of value outside of buffalo.

jc17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 06:34 AM
  #7
Tyler2829
Registered User
 
Tyler2829's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 529
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc17 View Post
Bogosian.

I just really don't see Carrier having a ton of value outside of buffalo.
He might. Isn't the rumor that Murray had a deal in place to protect Carrier? Why make a deal for someone you don't think would get drafted.

Tyler2829 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 06:41 AM
  #8
WJZ3
SAVEMONEY
 
WJZ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Buffalo
Country: United States
Posts: 1,742
vCash: 500
Justin Kea

In all seriousness, I think Bogo or Carrier are taken, I wouldn't worry about Ullmark

WJZ3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 06:49 AM
  #9
Jim Bob
....Rebooting....
 
Jim Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 23,553
vCash: 500
I voted Moulson because of the godfather angle.

While everyone is freaking out over Carrier being exposed, I will be mildly surprised if that is the pick.

I think it's either going to be Ullmark or a veteran guy like Moulson or Bogosian. Ullmark would have been too easy a pick, so I threw Moulson out there.

Jim Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 06:55 AM
  #10
Duddy
Everyday is
 
Duddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Austria
Posts: 11,003
vCash: 50
Bogo, cuz they will need some defensemen they can't trade. Someones gotta play.

Duddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 06:56 AM
  #11
Jim Bob
....Rebooting....
 
Jim Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 23,553
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duddy View Post
Bogo, cuz they will need some defensemen they can't trade. Someones gotta play.
Why wouldn't they draft and keep Vatanen and Dumba? That would seem to be a pretty good top 2 RHD right there.

Jim Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 07:05 AM
  #12
Samsonite23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: wny
Country: United States
Posts: 4,700
vCash: 500
Bogo.

Samsonite23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 07:12 AM
  #13
makeitburn
PUCKGASM
 
makeitburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: midwest
Country: United States
Posts: 1,391
vCash: 500
I'm unhappy about Carrier being exposed, but I don't think he's their top target.

makeitburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 07:37 AM
  #14
Sabre Dance
Winners win
 
Sabre Dance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 8,755
vCash: 500
Hit Carrier, but wanted Moulson.

Sabre Dance is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 07:49 AM
  #15
sabregoat
Registered User
 
sabregoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamburg, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,189
vCash: 500
I think Carrier, and then a side deal for Moulson.

sabregoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 07:52 AM
  #16
dkollidas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,507
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabregoat View Post
I think Carrier, and then a side deal for Moulson.
Hoping for this. If the cost of getting rid of Moulson is Carrier then I'm fine with it.

dkollidas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 07:56 AM
  #17
Duddy
Everyday is
 
Duddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Austria
Posts: 11,003
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Bob View Post
Why wouldn't they draft and keep Vatanen and Dumba? That would seem to be a pretty good top 2 RHD right there.
Because they will get a premium for them in trades. They won't make much noise in the first few years, so it would be smart to sell.

Duddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 07:58 AM
  #18
Dreakon13
Registered User
 
Dreakon13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mighty Taco, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,787
vCash: 500
I think people over-estimate the leagues interest in Carrier, just because he's fast and our winger situation is so bad he's playing in the top 6.

I think it'll be Bogosian. Ultimately GM's are going to pay out the bottom in deals to keep Vegas from taking the D they were forced to expose, and Vegas would be silly to not load up on as many high picks as they can for the next few years. Bogosian might just be one of the top 6 most-appealing defenseman available when all's said and done, even as an expensive reclamation project.

Dreakon13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 08:11 AM
  #19
Reddawg
Registered User
 
Reddawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: Scotland
Posts: 3,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreakon13 View Post
I think people over-estimate the leagues interest in Carrier, just because he's fast and our winger situation is so bad he's playing in the top 6.
I agree...I think Carrier would be in the AHL for a lot of organizations.

Reddawg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 08:17 AM
  #20
Doug Prishpreed
Registered User
 
Doug Prishpreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,636
vCash: 500
I would rather keep Carrier over Ullmark -- if that's the swap our new GM has made, I strongly disagree with it.

Vegas would not take Bogo/Ennis/Moulson unless we payed them handsomely.

Doug Prishpreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 08:22 AM
  #21
Ristoreilly
aka jawallstar1
 
Ristoreilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Orlando, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 4,759
vCash: 500
I think some of these votes are wishful thinking as much as logical thinking

Ristoreilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 08:32 AM
  #22
Doug Prishpreed
Registered User
 
Doug Prishpreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,636
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ristoreilly View Post
I think some of these votes are wishful thinking as much as logical thinking
Exactly...that's what I was trying to clarify in my post. Do we vote who we WANT them to take, or who we THINK they'll take?

Doug Prishpreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 08:50 AM
  #23
Sabre Dance
Winners win
 
Sabre Dance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 8,755
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ristoreilly View Post
I think some of these votes are wishful thinking as much as logical thinking
Based on the deal Murray had in place I don't think Carrier gets picked.

Sabre Dance is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 09:30 AM
  #24
BiPolarBear
Registered User
 
BiPolarBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,534
vCash: 500
Bogosian, people forget that he was essentially traded straight up for Tyler Myers - he was a top 4 dman as was Myers. Bogosian has had a rough couple of years but he's not old, he'll be good again. I think McPhee will see it that way.

My 2nd choice is Moulson because of their personal relationship and Moulson can score plus mentorship abilities.

BiPolarBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-19-2017, 09:37 AM
  #25
ZZamboni
Puttin' on the Foil
 
ZZamboni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 13,155
vCash: 500
i think Ullmark. I hope Bogo.

ZZamboni is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2017 All Rights Reserved.