HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Buffalo Sabres
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Trade Bait

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
10-25-2003, 10:34 AM
  #1
Foligno17
Guest
 
Country:
Posts: n/a
vCash:
Trade Bait

Now that one tenth of the season is behind us, I thought I'd take a look at the most likely players to get traded by the deadline.

1) Maxim Afinogenov

Max has one point in six games played and we haven't missed him in the two games he's been scratched. His obvious skills make him attractive to a team that misses the playoffs. Dumont is getting some production and is a more complete player who can play either wing for about the same salary. He can also play on a checking line with some success.

2) Henrik Tallinder

I like this guy, but he's been terrible. We have two more young defensemen. I'm still convinced that Kalinin will be a good one and that Campbell could turn into a decent offensive DMan.

3) Alexei Zhitnik

Only if we're out of the playoff hunt. Then this could be a salary dump.

4) Martin Biron

The other two goaltenders are too young and make too little to even consider trading. The most likely scenario is that all three stay in the Sabres organization at least one more year.

5) Tim Connolly

By virtue of not playing a game so far this season, Connolly isn't the worst perfoming player on the team. He is the youngest forward on the roster, and should be given more time to succeed in Buffalo. I doubt that he goes anywhere.


I'll look at this again in another eight games.

 
Old
10-25-2003, 12:01 PM
  #2
Jovavic
The Unnamed Feeling
 
Jovavic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: IR with CBJ
Country: Qatar
Posts: 11,074
vCash: 500
Buffaloed and I were talking on a similar thread on the Jackets board. How does Kosmachev (drafted in the third round last season) and a mid level pick for Maxim and rights to Kristek sound?

Jovavic is offline  
Old
10-25-2003, 01:21 PM
  #3
Takeo
Registered User
 
Takeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 19,166
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Ozzie X
Buffaloed and I were talking on a similar thread on the Jackets board. How does Kosmachev (drafted in the third round last season) and a mid level pick for Maxim and rights to Kristek sound?
Kosmachev would be a nice pick-up, but I think Max, at 24 years old, could fetch a bit more. Besides, I really don't think Max is on the block (or anywhere close to it), despite being a healthy scratch the last couple games.

Takeo is offline  
Old
10-25-2003, 03:59 PM
  #4
Takeo
Registered User
 
Takeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 19,166
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foligno17
Now that one tenth of the season is behind us, I thought I'd take a look at the most likely players to get traded by the deadline.

1) Maxim Afinogenov

Max has one point in six games played and we haven't missed him in the two games he's been scratched. His obvious skills make him attractive to a team that misses the playoffs. Dumont is getting some production and is a more complete player who can play either wing for about the same salary. He can also play on a checking line with some success.

2) Henrik Tallinder

I like this guy, but he's been terrible. We have two more young defensemen. I'm still convinced that Kalinin will be a good one and that Campbell could turn into a decent offensive DMan.

3) Alexei Zhitnik

Only if we're out of the playoff hunt. Then this could be a salary dump.

4) Martin Biron

The other two goaltenders are too young and make too little to even consider trading. The most likely scenario is that all three stay in the Sabres organization at least one more year.

5) Tim Connolly

By virtue of not playing a game so far this season, Connolly isn't the worst perfoming player on the team. He is the youngest forward on the roster, and should be given more time to succeed in Buffalo. I doubt that he goes anywhere.


I'll look at this again in another eight games.

I think you should swap Afinogenov, Tallinder, and Zhitnik for Dumont, Brown, and Campbell. But that's just me.

Takeo is offline  
Old
10-25-2003, 04:03 PM
  #5
Takeo
Registered User
 
Takeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 19,166
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foligno17
Now that one tenth of the season is behind us, I thought I'd take a look at the most likely players to get traded by the deadline.

1) Maxim Afinogenov

Max has one point in six games played and we haven't missed him in the two games he's been scratched. His obvious skills make him attractive to a team that misses the playoffs. Dumont is getting some production and is a more complete player who can play either wing for about the same salary. He can also play on a checking line with some success.

2) Henrik Tallinder

I like this guy, but he's been terrible. We have two more young defensemen. I'm still convinced that Kalinin will be a good one and that Campbell could turn into a decent offensive DMan.

3) Alexei Zhitnik

Only if we're out of the playoff hunt. Then this could be a salary dump.

4) Martin Biron

The other two goaltenders are too young and make too little to even consider trading. The most likely scenario is that all three stay in the Sabres organization at least one more year.

5) Tim Connolly

By virtue of not playing a game so far this season, Connolly isn't the worst perfoming player on the team. He is the youngest forward on the roster, and should be given more time to succeed in Buffalo. I doubt that he goes anywhere.


I'll look at this again in another eight games.
I would take Max, Tallinder, and Zhitnik off the block and replace them with Dumont, Brown, and Campbell. But that's just me.

Takeo is offline  
Old
10-25-2003, 05:14 PM
  #6
imyourhuckleberry
Nyaaa..What's Up Doc
 
imyourhuckleberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 2,070
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeo21
I would take Max, Tallinder, and Zhitnik off the block and replace them with Dumont, Brown, and Campbell. But that's just me.

I'd say they are all eligable to be put on the block. none of those guys have contributed as much as they could. but I'd be a bit more hesitant with campbell and max since i think they both can contribute, especially campbell.

imyourhuckleberry is offline  
Old
10-25-2003, 07:26 PM
  #7
lecherous
Registered User
 
lecherous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: Sweden
Posts: 3,186
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to lecherous
Personally I'd say :

1. Connolly
2. Dumont
3. Noronen
4. Max (But only if we get a good return for him - I'm ready to give him 1 more year)
5. Zhitnik (if out of the hunt)

1. I'd say trade Connolly for realistically whatever we can get for him. Right now he's just taking up a bit more than $1m on the payroll, and probably won't contribute much to the team when he's back from injury.

2. Dumont...I don't think he needs to be traded, but if I was Darcy I'd be listening very carefully to offers for him. He looks out of place and lacking desire big time. Maybe we can send him off to Montreal for Dackell? I think Dackell would be awesome on the 3rd line for us, and Dumont can't realistically contribute to the 2nd line. He's passable on the 3rd line, but not the ideal 3rd liner. Montreal fans - would you guys do that deal? I don't see why not.

3. Noronen...I don't think we need to trade him, but if we can get a good return for him, I'd definitely deal him. He had a bad year last year and hasn't been consistent at all since, but people seem to forget that he still has real value. We could probably get a pretty good player in return for him. Maybe to Calgary for Gauthier and a 4th or something?

4. Max... I don't really want to trade him, but like I've said above... if the deal is too good to pass up, Darcy's gotta do it.

5. Zhitnik... I still think that if we're out of the playoff hunt, we can package Zhitnik and someone else of 2nd to 3rd round caliber, or a pick to Toronto for Colaiacovo...which would be an amazing pickup for this team.

lecherous is offline  
Old
10-25-2003, 07:32 PM
  #8
SuperUnknown
Registered User
 
SuperUnknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,610
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by lecherous
2. Dumont...I don't think he needs to be traded, but if I was Darcy I'd be listening very carefully to offers for him. He looks out of place and lacking desire big time. Maybe we can send him off to Montreal for Dackell? I think Dackell would be awesome on the 3rd line for us, and Dumont can't realistically contribute to the 2nd line. He's passable on the 3rd line, but not the ideal 3rd liner. Montreal fans - would you guys do that deal? I don't see why not.
I'm sure Montreal would jump all over this deal. However, are you sure that Buffalo would only want Dackell?

SuperUnknown is offline  
Old
10-25-2003, 07:36 PM
  #9
lecherous
Registered User
 
lecherous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: Sweden
Posts: 3,186
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to lecherous
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smail
I'm sure Montreal would jump all over this deal. However, are you sure that Buffalo would only want Dackell?
Well, I don't know what Montreal's value of Dackell is...but if he's still playing like he was when he was in Ottawa, he'd be perfect for Buffalo right now. Dumont wouldn't do more than 20-20-40 this year, and I think Dackell is a consistent 12-18-30 (ish) guy...I'd definitely be willing to sacrifice a few goals for a guy who actually works hard each game.

Also, Dackell would significantly improve our PK.

lecherous is offline  
Old
10-26-2003, 03:44 AM
  #10
TVanek26*
 
TVanek26*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Buffalo,New York
Country: United States
Posts: 8,583
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to TVanek26*
Quote:
Originally Posted by lecherous
Well, I don't know what Montreal's value of Dackell is...but if he's still playing like he was when he was in Ottawa, he'd be perfect for Buffalo right now. Dumont wouldn't do more than 20-20-40 this year, and I think Dackell is a consistent 12-18-30 (ish) guy...I'd definitely be willing to sacrifice a few goals for a guy who actually works hard each game.

Also, Dackell would significantly improve our PK.
Dude, Dackell is a career third liner in the mold of Curtis Brown...But Curtis Brown has better offense, defense and leadership.We could get more then Dackell.

TVanek26* is offline  
Old
10-26-2003, 05:14 AM
  #11
Foligno17
Guest
 
Country:
Posts: n/a
vCash:
. Noronen...I don't think we need to trade him, but if we can get a good return for him, I'd definitely deal him. He had a bad year last year and hasn't been consistent at all since, but people seem to forget that he still has real value. We could probably get a pretty good player in return for him.

Noronen makes less sense to trade than Biron due to salary reasons. If my source is correct, he makes $550K compared with $2.2M for Biron. The Sabres are already a little over budget and would need to trade salary to afford a veteran stay-at-home defenseman. If Biron plays well enough to take the starting job, I think we should keep all three goaltenders for one more year.

I have to admit that I have done a complete reversal on Connolly. I'm remembering that he is only 22. Let him play a "rookie" season this year. Give him a conditioning assignment and some time on the 4th line this year. Connolly also gives Lindy an option when a top six forward is playing poorly.

 
Old
10-26-2003, 05:40 AM
  #12
Ghost of Dale Hunter
Registered User
 
Ghost of Dale Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Buffalo
Country: United States
Posts: 1,379
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foligno17
. Noronen...I don't think we need to trade him, but if we can get a good return for him, I'd definitely deal him. He had a bad year last year and hasn't been consistent at all since, but people seem to forget that he still has real value. We could probably get a pretty good player in return for him.

Noronen makes less sense to trade than Biron due to salary reasons. If my source is correct, he makes $550K compared with $2.2M for Biron. The Sabres are already a little over budget and would need to trade salary to afford a veteran stay-at-home defenseman. If Biron plays well enough to take the starting job, I think we should keep all three goaltenders for one more year.

I have to admit that I have done a complete reversal on Connolly. I'm remembering that he is only 22. Let him play a "rookie" season this year. Give him a conditioning assignment and some time on the 4th line this year. Connolly also gives Lindy an option when a top six forward is playing poorly.

If you bring in another goalie Biron must go. If a team gives up on their number 1 goalie they have to move him out or face a cancer in the lockeroom. I don't see Biron taking a demotion quietly.

You may end up giving Biron away, almost addition by subtraction.I am not saying it is right, just likely if another #1 is brought in to buffalo without Biron leaving in the deal.

Ghost of Dale Hunter is offline  
Old
10-26-2003, 01:20 PM
  #13
Buffaloed
Administrator
Webmaster
 
Buffaloed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 24,964
vCash: 2662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Ozzie X
Buffaloed and I were talking on a similar thread on the Jackets board. How does Kosmachev (drafted in the third round last season) and a mid level pick for Maxim and rights to Kristek sound?
I'd prefer a deal like that, but given the Sabres desire to make the playoffs, I think they're going to make a move for a veteran. My guess is they're going to end up dealing with San Jose for one of Ricci, Thornton, or even Damphousse. The Sharks have shown a willingness to pick up salary to make deals and I believe all 3 of those guys are pending UFA's.

Buffaloed is offline  
Old
10-26-2003, 03:23 PM
  #14
lecherous
Registered User
 
lecherous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: Sweden
Posts: 3,186
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to lecherous
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffaloed
I'd prefer a deal like that, but given the Sabres desire to make the playoffs, I think they're going to make a move for a veteran. My guess is they're going to end up dealing with San Jose for one of Ricci, Thornton, or even Damphousse. The Sharks have shown a willingness to pick up salary to make deals and I believe all 3 of those guys are pending UFA's.
Eew, I wouldn't want any of those bums.

Honestly, I'd wait until at least the end of December to see where we are. Though personally I'd like to see Connolly moved no matter what...for a veteran if we're in the hunt, or for a prospect or two if we're out of the hunt.

lecherous is offline  
Old
10-26-2003, 05:07 PM
  #15
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,651
vCash: 500
I would LOVE to get Ricci. Campbell?

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
10-27-2003, 04:06 AM
  #16
WhoIsJimBob
#TankEnvy
 
WhoIsJimBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 17,742
vCash: 500
I would like to see Ricci in a Sabres uniform, but I wonder if the Sharks would deal the guy that initially was given the C in their rotating captaincy.

Although, the Sharks are off to a horrible start to the season and they could enter full fledged payroll slashing mose soon.

And with Curtis Brown centering Kotalik and Satan right now, Ricci would be a real nice fit as the Sabres 3rd line center.

WhoIsJimBob is offline  
Old
10-27-2003, 04:13 AM
  #17
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,651
vCash: 500
Ricci makes $3M. Ouch. He is 32. Still, I'd love to see him on the Sabres. He's exactly the type of player we need.

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
10-30-2003, 08:12 AM
  #18
teemu_s
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 20
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to teemu_s Send a message via MSN to teemu_s
Quote:
Originally Posted by lecherous
Well, I don't know what Montreal's value of Dackell is...but if he's still playing like he was when he was in Ottawa, he'd be perfect for Buffalo right now. Dumont wouldn't do more than 20-20-40 this year, and I think Dackell is a consistent 12-18-30 (ish) guy...I'd definitely be willing to sacrifice a few goals for a guy who actually works hard each game.

Also, Dackell would significantly improve our PK.
As a Hab-fan I'd be more than happy to give away Dackell and take Dumont or Afinogenov. We really need some scoring, badly.

teemu_s is offline  
Old
10-30-2003, 08:41 AM
  #19
billsandsabres
nhl 94 aficianado
 
billsandsabres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: troy, ny
Posts: 2,281
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by teemu_s
As a Hab-fan I'd be more than happy to give away Dackell and take Dumont or Afinogenov. We really need some scoring, badly.
i thought you said you needed scoring

billsandsabres is offline  
Old
10-30-2003, 10:12 AM
  #20
lecherous
Registered User
 
lecherous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: Sweden
Posts: 3,186
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to lecherous
Well, now I've changed my mind. Dumont has been playing with a passion lately that I've never seen before out of him. Weird.

lecherous is offline  
Old
10-30-2003, 11:22 AM
  #21
teemu_s
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 20
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to teemu_s Send a message via MSN to teemu_s
Quote:
Originally Posted by billsandsabres
i thought you said you needed scoring
Oh yeah, I said so. But Dackell can't score even if his life depends on it. Couldn't hit ocean from the boat. Etc. Etc. Dumont and Afinogenov still have some talent. We could also send you Juneau and Audette. Sabres 2000 re-united? How about that?

teemu_s is offline  
Old
10-31-2003, 12:46 AM
  #22
Mike#16*
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 197
vCash: 500
What would the Devils have to offer to get Max?

Mike#16* is offline  
Old
10-31-2003, 07:41 AM
  #23
billsandsabres
nhl 94 aficianado
 
billsandsabres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: troy, ny
Posts: 2,281
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike#16
What would the Devils have to offer to get Max?
david hale or mike rupp would pacify me

billsandsabres is offline  
Old
10-31-2003, 09:49 AM
  #24
lecherous
Registered User
 
lecherous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Country: Sweden
Posts: 3,186
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to lecherous
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike#16
What would the Devils have to offer to get Max?
I'll take Pihlman.

lecherous is offline  
Old
10-31-2003, 06:58 PM
  #25
Chainshot
Global Moderator
Give 'em Enough Rope
 
Chainshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Costa Rica
Country: Costa Rica
Posts: 57,076
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike#16
What would the Devils have to offer to get Max?
With nothing but cobwebs and dust on in the defensemen prospect cupboard, Hale's the better fit. That he has all the elements to be a solid, well-rounded defenseman make him a much more appealing target. Not that I think the Devils part with him willingly, nor solely for Afinogenov. But I'm sure Regier is more than eager to get some young blood into the defense corps veins.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTL
i'd take Rupp.
And here I thought you'd mention Parise.

Chainshot is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.