HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Montreal Canadiens
Notices

The impact of arbitration

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-10-2006, 08:55 AM
  #1
toshiro
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Canuckland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,951
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to toshiro
The impact of arbitration

Al Strachan on Slam this morning
"You probably can't afford to keep them, and even if you could, the salary cap won't let you. And these are players you drafted five, six or seven years ago, so you've just wasted all that time trying to build through the draft.

You have no choice but to let them walk away.

It has happened twice in the past few days. It's going to happen a lot more in the future."


Ratcheting will have arbitrators looking at deals like Havlat as full market value and thats what counts baby. All players are closer to being free agents in terms of cost earlier.

toshiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2006, 09:00 AM
  #2
ti-vite
Registered User
 
ti-vite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,076
vCash: 500
How many team right now can afford a player wanting 5-6 M$?

Not many, most of the money has been spent already, most teams right up against the cap or own targets.

I am curious to see what happens to Dumont...

ti-vite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2006, 09:19 AM
  #3
Marksman
Registered User
 
Marksman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Country: Finland
Posts: 3,626
vCash: 500
Salary cap just means GMs have to become more careful how they sign players. Having too many RFAs can really hurt if your team has a good year - Sabres are lucky if Dumont is the only player they lose. On the other hand giving players to big longterm contracts can really limit the flexibility. Hopefully the cap comes down again for next season ... NHL is so much more exiting when playing field is level for everyone.

Marksman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2006, 09:38 AM
  #4
AH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Woodbridge, ON
Country: Pakistan
Posts: 4,877
vCash: 500
Some RFAs with arb rights are more expensive than similar players who are UFA (and only a year or two older).

That is f-ed up.

AH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2006, 11:26 AM
  #5
coolguy21415
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Vietnam
Posts: 9,285
vCash: 500
I think we'll see the NHL move arbitration up to earlier in the offseason. I don't know if the timing is set in the CBA, but it could be something to be addressed in several years, given the increased importance of arbitration. As it stands, teams are hindered solely because of the timing. Teams should be able to fill their rosters with UFAs after the arbitration hearings have been done. i.e. UFA players to replace RFA arbitration rejections.

coolguy21415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2006, 12:20 PM
  #6
toshiro
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Canuckland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,951
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to toshiro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marksman View Post
Salary cap just means GMs have to become more careful how they sign players. Having too many RFAs can really hurt if your team has a good year - Sabres are lucky if Dumont is the only player they lose. On the other hand giving players to big longterm contracts can really limit the flexibility. Hopefully the cap comes down again for next season ... NHL is so much more exiting when playing field is level for everyone.
To level the playing field Montreal would have to have better weather, better taxes, better press and a welcoming of non francophones attitude.

toshiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2006, 12:20 PM
  #7
toshiro
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Canuckland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,951
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to toshiro
Quote:
Originally Posted by AH View Post
Some RFAs with arb rights are more expensive than similar players who are UFA (and only a year or two older).

That is f-ed up.
Exactly!

toshiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-10-2006, 12:33 PM
  #8
CaptCrunch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 787
vCash: 500
On the arbitration, I think the process is going to force a lot of teams to make better efforts at building cases.

I think its not a stretch to think that some teams will have access to better deal through arbitration because they are more skilled at presenting their cases.

While other teams will pay through their nose because they've been crushed in court by experienced agents.

CaptCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.