2-Renaud Lavoie/François Gagnon(not some time)
HM: Jacques Demers, he's freak sometime, right, but he know the hockey game, in general he got nice comments.
1-Jean Pagé ( he didnt know anything about hockey )
2-Jean Perron ( how he have won a stanley cup as head coach)
3-Michel Bergeron ( sorry but he's idiot, he say like " Dazé serait un bon ailier à 6 pieds 2 pouces. ) He's 6"6.
Everybody who's at 110$ except for Gagnon they're all wrong. BTW sometime they're so stupid that Gagnon can even talk about intelligent thing.
I should start reading Mathias Brunet a bit more. I've good feedback about him.
For top 3,
1-Francois Gagnon I really like this guy his blog was cool I hope he'll contoinue next year.
2-Bob McKenzie Knows a lot on draft and prospect know the game well usually good comments
3-Dany Dube pretty good analist
Hum thats it I think... Dont like a lot of journalist though.
1-Jean Pagé Oh I cant stand this guy. All about quebec we should trade any player for a quebecois and all I hate him soooooo much.
2-Y.Pedenault Ah worst analist I ever seen. Why is he inducted to hll of fame?
3-M.Bergeron Cant stand this guy either never stop bashing on euro.
4-M.Villeneuve I hate him too hate euro dont know about hockey big ego ah cant stand this guy.
5-M.Bureau oh... never stop bashing on euro too. Dont know about hockey much never stop saying stupid thing.
Could have more though...
Enrico Ciccone on 110% is good I like this guy too...
I don't read him often, but Mathias brunet is very good.
I liked Bertrand Raymond in the past but now I think he's just trying to write hockey novellas and bring us emotions, and it never works.
Francois Gagnon is all right a 100%, but the other ones so dispise me that I don't watch him anymore.
Bob McKenzie is good of course..
Like everyone, I can't believe that Michel Bergeron and Jean Perron are still allowed to talk about hockey. Jean Pagé doesn't know a single thing about hockey. I wasn't a big fan of him either, but at least Paul Rivard was able to control the debates. Michel Villeneuve knows his hockey, but he tries so much to convince us that he loses all his credibility. He thinks too much about himself.
I was wondering , from all the hockey experts , all over the montreal media, who s the hockey expert with the most credibility.
By credibility, I am not only talking about rumors. By credibility I mean, when this guy or this media talk, how much faith you have in his words.
Think about each guys while using some criterions ....
3-If he is bias or not skewed
4-His achievements or success in the pass
5-The overall quality of his work
First of all, write your top 3 (the top 3 hockey experts who has the most credibility).
Than write your bottom 3 ( the worse 3 hockey experts who has the less credibility).
You can write a journalism, blogger, media , newspapers, website , etc...
Here is the list (feel free to add more of them)
-La Presse (in general)
-Journal de Montreal (in general)
-TEAM 990 (in general)
-CKAC (in general)
-TSN (website and media)
-RDS (website and media)
-Sportsnet (website and media)
-Blogger from Blogger.com
-110% in general
-Le Baron Alain Chantelois
-TQS (in general)
-TVA (in general)
-Radio-Canada/CBC (in general)