HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

A crazy suggestion...

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-18-2003, 05:27 AM
  #1
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,469
vCash: 500
A crazy suggestion...

I know how much people hate the Leetch-Poti pairing, but I suggest we go back to it. Further, keep M&M together and play deVries and Kaspar to go against top lines. Further, allow Kaspar to play his game - bone-cruching/agitating. a five-man unit consisting of those two and Holik's checking line is worth a shot, I believe (especially going into Colorado Thursday night). Further, in PITT, Kovalev often went against top lines (and I believe Kaspar was out there with him, so it ain't new for him). Why am I saying this? Because all the focus has been on the forward lines while this team gives up 35-40 shots per night and opposing forwards run rampant in the Rangers' defense. Further, there is no true pairing to go against top lines - although Kaspar has not proven he can play against anybody good (I think he's had a solid season against third and fourth liners) I think it may be time to ride some of his success.

Fletch is offline  
Old
11-18-2003, 06:17 AM
  #2
klingsor
HFBoards Sponsor
 
klingsor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 14,141
vCash: 500
Why not?

Leetch-Poti is not ideal, but it worked to some degree last year.

We keep on looking for Beuk#2 for Leetch, but we don't have one.

klingsor is offline  
Old
11-18-2003, 06:35 AM
  #3
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,469
vCash: 500
It would be better, however..

If Lindros were back and Kovalev (and Lundmark) were with him, with Leetch and Poti out there to complete the unit of five. There would be less pressure on the defense with those guys out there as a result of going against checkers, and hopefully from some offensive pressure.

Fletch is offline  
Old
11-18-2003, 07:05 AM
  #4
Bluenote13
Believe In Henke
 
Bluenote13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 23,868
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by klingsor
Why not?

Leetch-Poti is not ideal, but it worked to some degree last year.

We keep on looking for Beuk#2 for Leetch, but we don't have one.

No, we don't have another Beuk because SLATS refuses to bring in defensemen that only play defense. Cale Hulse, Todd Simpson, Jon Klemm, Denis Gauthier - all these guys could've been had, at a relatively low price & they wouldve fit in nice with #2. They all have some offensive instincts, but mainly they do what they do best - keep the pucks from getting to the goalie. Nope, jack*ss rather have 'mobile' defensemen that can join the rush once we recover the long rebounds our goalies let loose....problem is the other team usually gets there first.

Bluenote13 is offline  
Old
11-18-2003, 09:13 AM
  #5
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,243
vCash: 500
Fletch, my problem with your pairings is that Bouchard is still not in the lineup. At this point with Leetch struggling to get 100%, is it really such a stretch to say that Bouchard (when in the lineup) has been our best defenseman all year? I do not see how this guy is still not dressed for games. It no longer makes a difference to me who sits, so long as Bouchard is one of the top 6.

True Blue is offline  
Old
11-18-2003, 10:41 AM
  #6
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,469
vCash: 500
Trying to work with reality...

and thinking long-term. Bouchard is a seventh defenseman and will likely remain as such. I was just working within those parameters.

Fletch is offline  
Old
11-18-2003, 11:10 AM
  #7
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,243
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch
and thinking long-term. Bouchard is a seventh defenseman and will likely remain as such. I was just working within those parameters.
Meaning that you think that Bouchard is nothing but a 7th defenseman or that that is what he is in the world according to Sather? I agree that with Sather at the helm, it would take an act of God for Bouchard to displace one of the current top 6. However, I think that in reality, Bouchard has played much better all year than anyone who has been dressing as our defensemen in the last several games.

True Blue is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.