HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

1/4 point rankings, prior to tonight

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-26-2003, 07:02 PM
  #1
oilerdynasty
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sherwood Park
Country: Canada
Posts: 412
vCash: 500
1/4 point rankings, prior to tonight

http://www.allsports.com/network/con...74&story=45980

Ratings based on their roles

oilerdynasty is offline  
Old
11-26-2003, 07:41 PM
  #2
Allan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Country: United Nations
Posts: 1,405
vCash: 500
Who is this Jay Pearson guy? Has he watched many games this year?

"34 Fernando Pisani Right Wing F, 3 goals and 9 points, +7... Has been in-vis-ib-le. Just a mess on the ice. There is not one solid area in his game."

He's played on a poor defensive team, and has a +7 in 21 games, and he has scored 9 points in that time, despite the fact that the bulk of his ice time is against other teams top lines, and killing penalties. This guy will never be an all-star, but he is a very good checking winger.

"32 Scott Ferguson Defence F, 2 assists, +4... Can you spell slow? F-E-R-G-U-S-O-N. Old is also spelled F-E-R-G-U-S-O-N. Ineffiective. He's a liability in his own end and leaves the offensive zone too early."

He's had his problems, but he's not that bad. And he's only 30. Off the top of my head, I can think of three older guys on this team (Oates qualifies as a spelling of old, however), and it's one of the youngest in the league. The average age is close to 28. That cheap shot ruined any credibility the article had.

A lot of quibbling disagreements as well, but I think those are just interpretation things. These two were just so bizarre I had to wonder if the writer had watched more than one or two games this year, and had done any research.

Allan is offline  
Old
11-27-2003, 12:09 PM
  #3
Walsher
Registered User
 
Walsher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,339
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan
Who is this Jay Pearson guy? Has he watched many games this year?

"34 Fernando Pisani Right Wing F, 3 goals and 9 points, +7... Has been in-vis-ib-le. Just a mess on the ice. There is not one solid area in his game."

He's played on a poor defensive team, and has a +7 in 21 games, and he has scored 9 points in that time, despite the fact that the bulk of his ice time is against other teams top lines, and killing penalties. This guy will never be an all-star, but he is a very good checking winger.

"32 Scott Ferguson Defence F, 2 assists, +4... Can you spell slow? F-E-R-G-U-S-O-N. Old is also spelled F-E-R-G-U-S-O-N. Ineffiective. He's a liability in his own end and leaves the offensive zone too early."

He's had his problems, but he's not that bad. And he's only 30. Off the top of my head, I can think of three older guys on this team (Oates qualifies as a spelling of old, however), and it's one of the youngest in the league. The average age is close to 28. That cheap shot ruined any credibility the article had.

A lot of quibbling disagreements as well, but I think those are just interpretation things. These two were just so bizarre I had to wonder if the writer had watched more than one or two games this year, and had done any research.
100% agree. Brutal insights by a no-name writer. Pisani has been awesome defensively - look at his numbers. The plus minus speaks for itself playing against the other teams best units. Whatever this guy has been smoking it must have been really cheap.

Walsher is offline  
Old
11-27-2003, 01:27 PM
  #4
SeriousBusiness
T.Hall da man
 
SeriousBusiness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,620
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walsher
100% agree. Brutal insights by a no-name writer. Pisani has been awesome defensively - look at his numbers. The plus minus speaks for itself playing against the other teams best units. Whatever this guy has been smoking it must have been really cheap.

The Ferguson comment was way out of line. He has played in almost every game for us. Doesn't that mean something? Liability in his own end? He is plus 4.

I don't know why Raffi gets a B. He has been outstanding. He gets a A from me

SeriousBusiness is offline  
Old
11-27-2003, 02:07 PM
  #5
Master Lok
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,057
vCash: 500
What a joke. I posted my response on their website below.
============================================

Sure he has the right to his opinion, but if JP's going to be publishing an article, expect to get flamed if he doesn't know what he's watching!

Bergeron a B+? He creates offense true, but also gives up a lot of turnovers in his own end. A C+ is more fair.
Chimera a B+? What has he done? He's been relegated down to pressbox and 4th line duties.
You rated Chimera higher than Hemsky? What more do you expect from the kid? He's already on pace for a 60 point season in his sophomore season and that's a C?
Pisani an F? His linemates (RPM) are both B+'s. He has 9 points and is +7 on the checking line and you fail him? Is this a personal dislike? Pisani an F?

Master Lok is offline  
Old
11-27-2003, 02:21 PM
  #6
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1
Registered User
 
LoudmouthHemskyfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: E-town
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,647
vCash: 500
Some of the rankings were bang on, and some were just completely out of left field.

I was happy to see he is one of the few who has given Bergeron his due, but then you get something like giving Pisani an F and you wonder what this guy is thinking.

LoudmouthHemskyfan#1 is offline  
Old
11-27-2003, 02:48 PM
  #7
Vomiting Kermit*
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,561
vCash: 500
Some of Pearson's grades are agreeable, but others are terrible and humorless (i.e. his Ferguson remark). In conclusion, most of his articles on that site are poorly written.
Thankfully, there's an excellent report card by lowetide on the boards here that is thought through very well.

Vomiting Kermit* is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.