HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

New Jersey a perfect partner?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-15-2007, 06:23 PM
  #26
TheGreatone94
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,698
vCash: 500
If NJ is on our radar, I would only look at Martin or Matvichuk, maybe Lukowich as well.

TheGreatone94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2007, 12:07 PM
  #27
WHAfanatic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Airdrie
Country: Canada
Posts: 984
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedOil83 View Post
Let's not get carried away now.. Gomez is in a whole other world from Horcoff, no matter what their contract status is.

I don't think a deal would go down in which someone is attaining Gomez as a rental. If he is traded, I think he'll sign long term first.

Even if he were traded as a rental, why would you want someone back who is half the player and only 1.5M cheaper?
I disagree somewhat. I don't think Horcoff is half the player Gomez is. Gomez is a 1st or 2nd line center with wonderful playmaking ability, an underused shot but suspect defensively and, in the past anyway, prone to inconsistent efforts. Horcoff is a 2nd to 3rd line center with excellent work ethic and conditioning, admirable defensive awareness and focus, top-notch faceoff ability but inconsistent offensive contributions b/c he trys to do too much with the puck instead of making the safe play. I'd say he is about 3/4 the player Gomez is.

Obviously, if a deal for Gomez involved signing a contract 1st then, no, horcoff is not worth a Gomez. That is so obvious I'm surprised I even have to state it. However, Gomez, as a rental, is not worth a Horcoff by the current market, imo. The only team that might do that deal is a team on the very verge of winning a cup and needing a playmaking center. Also, it's arguable that Horcoff plays a more 'playoff' type game (i.e. a two-way player with strong defensive skills, versatile and won't dissappear with the tighter checking) so even that deal is unlikely imo.

WHAfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.