HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Minnesota Wild
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Gameday thread: Wild @ Canucks, Dec. 6

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-06-2003, 08:04 AM
  #1
theo6060
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,801
vCash: 500
Gameday thread: Wild @ Canucks, Dec. 6

Wild 9-13-4
Canucks 14-7-3-2

My prediction is 3-1 Vancouver. Minnesota goal by the Canuck-killer Marian Gaborik.

theo6060 is offline  
Old
12-06-2003, 08:30 AM
  #2
Thalia
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Scotland
Posts: 4,792
vCash: 500
A 3-2 win for the 'Nucks in a tough fought grinding (but not too physical) battle.

Thalia is offline  
Old
12-06-2003, 09:21 AM
  #3
Blackadder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 133
vCash: 500
I'm with Theo, 3-1. 2 goals is just way too optimistic for the Wild atm.

Blackadder is offline  
Old
12-06-2003, 10:06 AM
  #4
ceber
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wyoming, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 3,500
vCash: 500
Canucks 4, Wild 1. Even with Naslund out the Canucks will find a way to get 4. Too many of our guys down or sick to hold off the Canucks. Defense will have to be very, very good if we want a shot at staying in this one, I think.
Despite what Lemaire has said, I would really like to see Gaborik and Daigle on a line again. I think Daigle has been one of our best guys, if not the best guy, we've got when it comes to generating offense. Plus, he's been good on the backcheck, which apparently you really need when you skate with Gaborik these days.
It would be nice to see Bouchard back in the game, but based on what the Canucks usually do I think I'd rather see him rest up one more.

ceber is offline  
Old
12-06-2003, 04:01 PM
  #5
Kristofer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 365
vCash: 500
3-0 Nucks

Kristofer is offline  
Old
12-06-2003, 08:07 PM
  #6
ceber
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wyoming, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 3,500
vCash: 500
Whew! Well, it wasn't pretty, but I'm pleased with the point. Considering the way this team's been playing, coming home with 3 of 6 points on a 3-game-in-4-day road trip through the Northwest has got to be looked at as a success, dotcha think? The loss to Calgary was a little tough to take, but they've been playing really well of late. Edmonton we hadn't beaten in regulation before. Vancouver's at the top of the division. To top it off, we did it without Mitchell, Bouchard, Chouinard, and with a handful of guys with the flu. All in all, a successful, if not overly entertaining, road trip.

I just hope the team can focus on the good and not the bad, because there's been a fair bit of bad if you want to look for it.

ceber is offline  
Old
12-06-2003, 08:48 PM
  #7
kmad
Riot Survivor
 
kmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 31,980
vCash: 500

kmad is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 04:31 AM
  #8
ceber
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wyoming, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 3,500
vCash: 500
I'm not sure what these posts are getting at. Do you think fans in MN care if you're entertained?

ceber is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 11:09 AM
  #9
CFABoy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Richmond, BC
Posts: 359
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceber
I'm not sure what these posts are getting at. Do you think fans in MN care if you're entertained?
ya, but its pretty sad to pay $80 for this type of hockey. I feel for season ticket holders for Miny...it was just very frustrating to watch and I am not blaming Lemaire for playing this type of system but rather the league for expanding into too many markets and diluting the talent to such a point that teams like Minny are forced to play defensive counterattack hockey....sigh

CFABoy is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 12:54 PM
  #10
MN_Gopher
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mpls
Posts: 3,304
vCash: 2900
heck i am waiting to pay for season tickets its not boring its good hockey. i will take a 1-0 W any day of the week. a team may not always get the bounces but if you play hard D you make sure the other team isn't even getting a chance for a lucky bounce.

MN_Gopher is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 01:34 PM
  #11
quat
intheDanRusseljungle
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 8,925
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to quat
Quote:
Originally Posted by MN_Gopher
heck i am waiting to pay for season tickets its not boring its good hockey. i will take a 1-0 W any day of the week. a team may not always get the bounces but if you play hard D you make sure the other team isn't even getting a chance for a lucky bounce.
Watching an exciting hard working game with lot's of scoring chances but just a goal or two is fine, but calling a game that is full of interference in the neutral zone, and all five players collapsing in front of the goal good hockey, then you don't know good hockey when you see it. Enjoying a game like that because your team wins is an entirely different statement. In the end, winning does matter a lot, but this style of hockey is dull. Interference does not make for good hockey.

quat is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 03:16 PM
  #12
MN_Gopher
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mpls
Posts: 3,304
vCash: 2900
Quote:
Originally Posted by quat
Watching an exciting hard working game with lot's of scoring chances but just a goal or two is fine, but calling a game that is full of interference in the neutral zone, and all five players collapsing in front of the goal good hockey, then you don't know good hockey when you see it. Enjoying a game like that because your team wins is an entirely different statement. In the end, winning does matter a lot, but this style of hockey is dull. Interference does not make for good hockey.
Its not interference, we keep our feet moving for the most part. We get in lanes, taking away passes, make little space, play a team game yes. Its not lazy hockey we dont stand around and form a soccer wall. Sorry we dont play a wide open game and loose 6-5 all the time. And yes i do know good hockey. Good hockey is a game played within your limits. We are not a flashy team with lots of stars. We play the game we need to play to win. And that is good hockey, playing with in urself.

MN_Gopher is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 03:18 PM
  #13
ceber
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wyoming, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 3,500
vCash: 500
How much of the Wild do you guys watch? Just when they come to town to play the Canucks? You're going to see a tight game whenever the Wild play the Canucks because the Wild have to play very tight to stay in the game. Sometimes it gets dull, but it's not always dull, and when it's dull it's not just because of the defensive style of the Wild. I make it to nearly all the home games, and a pretty good number of them are entertaining. Honest. And hockey fans in Minnesota have a pretty strong 100+ year tradition of the game in the state, so even if I didn't know good hockey if it bit me in the butt, someone would have clued me in by now.

What's your definition of interference? The penalty definition, or anything that slows down movement through the neutral zone?

ceber is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 03:37 PM
  #14
DW
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MN
Posts: 926
vCash: 500
Why bother trying to converse with these guys. It's a waste of time trying to explain the Wild style of hockey to them. They use one word and it's all downhill from there. If they actually took off there blinders for once they would see the beauty of a trapping system. The fact the Wild don't generate a whole lot of offense is from the lack of having offensively gifted players, not the style of play. Unless someone thinks that Jim Dowd, Darby Hendrickson, Richard Park, and the like will someday become gifted playmakers and scorers. Which would shock the crap out of me.

DW is offline  
Old
12-07-2003, 04:03 PM
  #15
theo6060
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,801
vCash: 500
I think there may just be a misunderstanding here. Doesn't look to me like other team's fans said the Wild play a boring game. But what may be boring to one fan may be entertaining to another if that's the case. Lets chalk it up as a difference of opinion.

theo6060 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.