HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Montreal Canadiens
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Time to cash in the chips

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-17-2007, 11:45 AM
  #1
Teufelsdreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 14,745
vCash: 500
Time to cash in the chips

I wouldn't have said this a few weeks ago, but it's obvious that the Habs don't have much to look forward to this season or even next. Huet's injury was the coup de grâce. I think it's hopeless to try to sign Souray. Better trade him while his value is at its zenith. I'd try to keep Markov, but his re-signing isn't guaranteed either. If I had known that the Habs were going to go into an irreversible tailspin since the holidays, I'd have been in favor of trading both of them plus as many others as could be moved for a bunch of prospects and draft picks. When I look at Pittsburgh I don't see any hope of the Habs catching up to them in the near future with their present nucleus. There's no Crosby, Malkin, Staal, or Fleury in Montréal. Out go Rivet, Souray, Markov, Niinimaa, Dandenault, Bouillon, Koivu, Ryder, Kovalev, Samsonov, Bonk, Johnson, Downey, Murray, Bégin, Huet, and Aebischer. Some have time remaining on their contracts but none have more than 2 years left. In their place would come fresh young faces. Of course the Habs would finish near the bottom for a few seasons, but they'd have a few young veterans plus loads of talented youngsters, including some high draft picks. We'd have to feel the pain, but what are we experiencing now?

Teufelsdreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2007, 11:47 AM
  #2
UBCsalmonslayer
@2Holmes2
 
UBCsalmonslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver/Nanaimo BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,190
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to UBCsalmonslayer Send a message via AIM to UBCsalmonslayer Send a message via MSN to UBCsalmonslayer Send a message via Yahoo to UBCsalmonslayer Send a message via Skype™ to UBCsalmonslayer
Trade us Souray for Bulis and Chouinard?

Seriously though, we will accept a bag of pucks or a used practice jersey if you take Jane Useless back. I'm not even joking, he is that bad.


Last edited by UBCsalmonslayer: 02-17-2007 at 11:48 AM. Reason: typo
UBCsalmonslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2007, 11:51 AM
  #3
toshiro
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Canuckland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,951
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to toshiro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
I wouldn't have said this a few weeks ago, but it's obvious that the Habs don't have much to look forward to this season or even next. Huet's injury was the coup de grâce. I think it's hopeless to try to sign Souray. Better trade him while his value is at its zenith. I'd try to keep Markov, but his re-signing isn't guaranteed either. If I had known that the Habs were going to go into an irreversible tailspin since the holidays, I'd have been in favor of trading both of them plus as many others as could be moved for a bunch of prospects and draft picks. When I look at Pittsburgh I don't see any hope of the Habs catching up to them in the near future with their present nucleus. There's no Crosby, Malkin, Staal, or Fleury in Montréal. Out go Rivet, Souray, Markov, Niinimaa, Dandenault, Bouillon, Koivu, Ryder, Kovalev, Samsonov, Bonk, Johnson, Downey, Murray, Bégin, Huet, and Aebischer. Some have time remaining on their contracts but none have more than 2 years left. In their place would come fresh young faces. Of course the Habs would finish near the bottom for a few seasons, but they'd have a few young veterans plus loads of talented youngsters, including some high draft picks. We'd have to feel the pain, but what are we experiencing now?
The Habs do have good goaltending prospects.

toshiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2007, 12:03 PM
  #4
Habs13
Registered User
 
Habs13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Montreal
Country: England
Posts: 5,353
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
I wouldn't have said this a few weeks ago, but it's obvious that the Habs don't have much to look forward to this season or even next. Huet's injury was the coup de grâce. I think it's hopeless to try to sign Souray. Better trade him while his value is at its zenith. I'd try to keep Markov, but his re-signing isn't guaranteed either. If I had known that the Habs were going to go into an irreversible tailspin since the holidays, I'd have been in favor of trading both of them plus as many others as could be moved for a bunch of prospects and draft picks. When I look at Pittsburgh I don't see any hope of the Habs catching up to them in the near future with their present nucleus. There's no Crosby, Malkin, Staal, or Fleury in Montréal. Out go Rivet, Souray, Markov, Niinimaa, Dandenault, Bouillon, Koivu, Ryder, Kovalev, Samsonov, Bonk, Johnson, Downey, Murray, Bégin, Huet, and Aebischer. Some have time remaining on their contracts but none have more than 2 years left. In their place would come fresh young faces. Of course the Habs would finish near the bottom for a few seasons, but they'd have a few young veterans plus loads of talented youngsters, including some high draft picks. We'd have to feel the pain, but what are we experiencing now?
Insanity

Habs13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2007, 12:15 PM
  #5
kariya24
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 65
vCash: 500
Habs Buying or Selling??

Now that we are in 10th position would we be better buying or selling?? and if we sell what are the values of players like Souray and Kovy?

kariya24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-17-2007, 02:08 PM
  #6
WeThreeKings
DJ Nikita
 
WeThreeKings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 37,871
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to WeThreeKings
Souray has high value. Kovalev does not, since he has two more years on his contract.

WeThreeKings is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 12:37 AM
  #7
CH Wizard
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: preparin for 09 cup
Country: Afghanistan
Posts: 11,690
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to CH Wizard
If we keep playing mediocre till' the deadline?

What would you expect to happen? I seriously don't see Souray being traded because without him our team would be sad...

Do you see Rivet or Kovalev being dealt? Which player you see being dealt? Ryder maybe?

CH Wizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 12:42 AM
  #8
mtl_felix
Registered User
 
mtl_felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lavaltrie, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,090
vCash: 500
i just think no one gets traded... unless we lose every game till the deadline where we could probably trade some of our UFAs for picks..

mtl_felix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 12:44 AM
  #9
HFXMooseHabs
Registered User
 
HFXMooseHabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,085
vCash: 500
I think Rivet is the most likely to be traded.

HFXMooseHabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 12:44 AM
  #10
CrAzYNiNe
Registered User
 
CrAzYNiNe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,061
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to CrAzYNiNe
Do you know what the word mediocre is?

Because I would give my left arm for the habs to be playing mediocre, they are playing LIKE ****!!!

CrAzYNiNe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 12:46 AM
  #11
shimy1221*
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,122
vCash: 500
if we were playing medioce, id actually be happy

shimy1221* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 12:47 AM
  #12
Rockomax
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mtl
Posts: 519
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tlusty the clown View Post
What would you expect to happen? I seriously don't see Souray being traded because without him our team would be sad...

Do you see Rivet or Kovalev being dealt? Which player you see being dealt? Ryder maybe?
I don't see kovalev being moved, Ryder maybe...As for rivet, I must admit, but I'd love it

But I must admit that I think that Sheldon would be the most likely to be traded if we're out of the playoffs race...but I don't think that we would be good sellers because I think that the players that might interest the other teams are actually higgins, komisarek and Markov (I could see markov being traded, because I don't feel like he wants to stay here...he's our best D-man and the one that I'd like to resign the most but sadly, I've got this feeling )

Rockomax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 01:11 AM
  #13
Teufelsdreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 14,745
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs13 View Post
Insanity
This is exactly what Craig Patrick did with the Penguins. They used to have Jagr, Straka, Lang, Kovalev, and others not too long ago.

If he hadn't had a fire sale, do you think the Penguins would have Fleury, Malkin, Crosby, and Staal (in the chronological order of their draft years)?

Teufelsdreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 01:14 AM
  #14
Teufelsdreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 14,745
vCash: 500
Kovalev is off the market this season because he won't return to action until a week or 10 days past the trade deadline.

Teufelsdreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 01:47 AM
  #15
MathMan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,094
vCash: 500
The way I see it, the strategy of "fire sale, suck, draft" has been tried before by the Habs, very recently. It didn't work too well. But then again they didn't have the best of GMs before.

I don't think it makes sense to blow up the team completely. It's in a transition/measured rebuilding phase as it is, better to let that go on 'till the end. The upcoming core of the Habs is not Koivu-Kovalev-Ryder-Souray, it's Higgins-Plekanec-Latendresse and maybe Markov. The baton is in the process of being passed to a new core.

No, Montreal cannot match Pittsburgh's depth of young talent but neither can any team. And tanking would simply not result in a similar depth of talent because there's not going to be such a collection of talent coming up in the pipeline for a long long time, even if a team tried to suck as extensively as Pittsburgh did, fortuitously at just the right time. In a cap world, Pittsburgh's collection of talent has a definite half-life to it.

I am on the fence on whether it makes sense to trade Souray or not (if they're not going to be able to resign him then he should be traded), but making a conscious decision to suck for ten more years when your top lines are loaded with first- and second-year players is ridiculous.

MathMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 01:57 AM
  #16
Kirk Muller
Registered User
 
Kirk Muller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brrr -18, Gomez Cold
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,035
vCash: 500
Things do need to change and it is very apparent.For me, out is Rivet, Souray, Ryder, Perezhogin, Murray, Downey, Samsonov, Niniimaa, Kovalev, and Bouillon.

As much flak as Koivu has gotten the last few months, he has never been the problem. He may never have been the solution, but he is one of the few who i would have represent this team.

Now realistically you can't gut the team. It just doesn't happen. If Souray and Markov are intent on testing free agency, then deal them, and get some young NHLers.

Lastly, and for the love of god, change the damn attitude of this team. Stop with the small, but not very speedy forwards. Stop with the skilled team who plays soft. Stop with the damn 1-2-2 system that plays on no forecheck, or aggression. Stop being a defensive team who really isn't good defensively. I've never seen a team with such a personality disorder, and is completely contradictory to how they consider themselves.

Kirk Muller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 02:02 AM
  #17
coolguy21415
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Vietnam
Posts: 9,285
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
This is exactly what Craig Patrick did with the Penguins. They used to have Jagr, Straka, Lang, Kovalev, and others not too long ago.

If he hadn't had a fire sale, do you think the Penguins would have Fleury, Malkin, Crosby, and Staal (in the chronological order of their draft years)?
That example is completely irrelevant. Montreal isn't in the same financial situation, and honestly I'm amazed Craig Patrick still has a job. It's mismanagement that caused Pittsburgh to have so many great players right now.. not Craig Patrick's genius.

__________________
This content is hosted here with the objections of the poster.
coolguy21415 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 02:12 AM
  #18
Turbo
Registered User
 
Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greys section 325
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,198
vCash: 500
Realistically: Ryder, Rivet, Bouillon, Kovalev, Perezhogin are serious possibilities depending on the return.

Of course, Souray & Markov would bring the biggest return, but as you said, the team would be sad without them. And I also think both will sign and return next year - at least I think that's the team's plan.

Turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 02:16 AM
  #19
Turbo
Registered User
 
Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greys section 325
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,198
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pink_floyd_floyd View Post
if we were playing medioce, id actually be happy
Yeah, that too.

Turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 02:28 AM
  #20
Miller Time
Registered User
 
Miller Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,316
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo View Post
Of course, Souray & Markov would bring the biggest return, but as you said, the team would be sad without them. And I also think both will sign and return next year - at least I think that's the team's plan.
hmmm
that's weird, cuz I like both players and think that they are valuable, but frankly I am quite positive that the team is playing about as sad as I've ever seen any team play...
so if one or both were to be moved, what would that make us.... hmmm???

With Souray + Markov, Habs = Sad

Without Souray + Markov, Habs = Pathetic? AHL? QMJHL?...

seriously though, the team can't play any worse than it has, or at least, they can't do any worse than they have, so if Gainey can't be 100% positive that he will re-sign either or both, he needs to write of the rest of the year, move them and cash in for as much as he possibly can to MAKE SURE this kind of collapse doesn't repeat itself next year.

Miller Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 02:52 AM
  #21
ECWHSWI
5M? insulting!!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,042
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathMan View Post
The way I see it, the strategy of "fire sale, suck, draft" has been tried before by the Habs, very recently. It didn't work too well. But then again they didn't have the best of GMs before.

I don't think it makes sense to blow up the team completely. It's in a transition/measured rebuilding phase as it is, better to let that go on 'till the end. The upcoming core of the Habs is not Koivu-Kovalev-Ryder-Souray, it's Higgins-Plekanec-Latendresse and maybe Markov. The baton is in the process of being passed to a new core.

No, Montreal cannot match Pittsburgh's depth of young talent but neither can any team. And tanking would simply not result in a similar depth of talent because there's not going to be such a collection of talent coming up in the pipeline for a long long time, even if a team tried to suck as extensively as Pittsburgh did, fortuitously at just the right time. In a cap world, Pittsburgh's collection of talent has a definite half-life to it.

I am on the fence on whether it makes sense to trade Souray or not (if they're not going to be able to resign him then he should be traded), but making a conscious decision to suck for ten more years when your top lines are loaded with first- and second-year players is ridiculous.
hmmm... when's the last time the Habs did a firesale ? when's the last time the Habs didnt try to compete to make the playoffs ?

never.


As far as signing Souray well... you know that if we resign all our players chances are we'll have about the same team next year right...

What's the point of keeping Souray if all we do while he's here is compete for the last playoff spot and lose in the 1st or 2nd round ?

Last year, 8th spot, lost in round 1, this yeah SAME core of players and chances are we won't make the playoffs...


Anyway, going the "young" route doesnt mean sucking for the next decade... I mean, Nashville, Anaheim, San Jose, Buffalo are all teams loaded with YOUNG talents, and they ain't doing that bad if you ask me...

ECWHSWI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 03:32 AM
  #22
Kimota
Nation of Poutine
 
Kimota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Vieille Capitale
Country: France
Posts: 22,276
vCash: 500
We could do a fire sale. But that doesn't mean getting rid of everybody. The core guys with the big salaries could go like Saku, Kovy, Sourey and Rivet. And we offer a buyout to Sammy. But the rest would stay. And I would expect and hope to sign Markov long-term.

Kimota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 08:10 AM
  #23
WeThreeKings
DJ Nikita
 
WeThreeKings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 37,871
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to WeThreeKings
No way do I give up on Koivu. I'm all for trading Kovy, Souray, Rivet. Add to that list Bouillon, Ryder, Samsonov, Murray and Downey.

WeThreeKings is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 08:14 AM
  #24
LamborGREENie
 
LamborGREENie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,052
vCash: 500
Talking about acquiring young players, there is a rumour in wich we would deal Sheldon Souray to the Sharks for Joe Pavelski and a 1st round pick...

LamborGREENie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-18-2007, 08:21 AM
  #25
WeThreeKings
DJ Nikita
 
WeThreeKings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Halifax
Country: Canada
Posts: 37,871
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to WeThreeKings
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyPlayer101 View Post
Talking about acquiring young players, there is a rumour in wich we would deal Sheldon Souray to the Sharks for Joe Pavelski and a 1st round pick...
Which I would jump all over.

WeThreeKings is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.