HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Columbus Blue Jackets
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Plans for Fedorov next season?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-12-2007, 03:21 PM
  #26
OnYourIgnoreList
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casework View Post
If we only have a legitimate option of one or the other, I guess it becomes, do you have more faith in Hainsey to step it up on defense, or Fedorov/Brule/Fritsche/Brassard to step it up as a center? Even if a d-man improves the team more, we have a glaring hole atop our roster.
That's a good question and tough. Personally, I'd take the bet on Feds/Brule/Parma capable of going 1 and 2 at center. And the only reason I say that is because Fritsche and Brule have shown flashes of being what we need. It's not consistent and it's not predictable, but it's visible, so I think there's reason to hope. Not much to base a season on, I'll grant you that.

Even if AJ or Methot or whomever develops into their full potential overnight , I don't think that full potential fits with the specific need. From what little I know of our system, the only guy we do have who is in the mold of what we need is Russell.

Given that I feel a #1 C and a #2 D pick up are unlikely, I've already resigned myself to the fact that one of the two will have to be a faith-based position next year. I chose the C slot because it looked to me like Sergei's skills on the back end, dealing passes and leading the break, made a huge difference in the team's offensive capabilities. So if we got a guy for whom that was the natural position, it'd be that much better.

And Feds, I think, is still a good #2. So here's hoping Parma or Brule can play their way up the lines. I see Feds as #1 C at the start of the season (barring acqusitions) with #2 for Fritsche and #3 for Gilbert. Svits'll move to #4 and form a line with Platt (as a winger) and Picard/Lindstrom. Eventually, based on play, I hope to see Feds get moved to #2 C with Brule/Parma as #1.

I've said before, if I see Brassard (or Russell) up here anytime prior to October 2008, I'll be apoplectic. Unless they're both absolutely dominating in the AHL - I mean like Gretzky or Hull dominating - I want to let them marinate.

OnYourIgnoreList is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2007, 05:12 PM
  #27
Robert
Foligno family
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KY & Lime Lake NY
Country: United States
Posts: 30,916
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Robert
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrral View Post
Robert. I am not questioning the fact that he can play defense and can play it well. I also agree that the tools he offers back there is superior to what the team has right now. But you must be assuming that a number one center is guaranteed to be coming here either through UFA or a trade. What if the team stays basically the same next year, which is possible according to Hitch and DM. What are the lines going to be and where is the scoring coming from? How does the team fill the holes at center and with scoring by keeping him back on D? Odds are that Foote and Klesla are going to be the top D pair. Is it best for the team to have Fedorov playing second line D minutes? It just doesn't make sense to me. Please explain and show me your line thoughts with Fedorov on D if the team is basically the same.
If we don't get a top #1 center it can't be done...he has to stay at center in that case. Some good points were have been mentioned about his elbows as well, he must be able to win faceoffs....

If we do get the center, which I think we will, I'd consider Para at second line center as someone mentioned....Svitov on the third and Brule on the fourth....Malhotra will most likely be gone.

Brule could move up eventually if he earns it....

Robert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2007, 05:13 PM
  #28
Robert
Foligno family
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KY & Lime Lake NY
Country: United States
Posts: 30,916
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Robert
Quote:
Originally Posted by feicht View Post
Either way he should still play the point on the PP
Agreed.....

Robert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2007, 05:19 PM
  #29
Paxton Fettel
Registered User
 
Paxton Fettel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,241
vCash: 500
Jackets miss playoffs > Feds gets traded to Wings at deadline> Wings win Cup

Paxton Fettel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2007, 08:22 PM
  #30
motijoe
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 8
vCash: 500
at least we are not paying 7.6 million to an overpriced yashin at center, this is fedorov's last contract year

motijoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2007, 08:23 PM
  #31
X0ssbar
 
X0ssbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ...on a star!
Country: United States
Posts: 13,011
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxton Fettel View Post
Jackets miss playoffs > Feds gets traded to Wings at deadline> Wings win Cup
I really have no clue what this is supposed to mean? Trolling?

X0ssbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2007, 08:26 PM
  #32
Robert
Foligno family
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KY & Lime Lake NY
Country: United States
Posts: 30,916
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Robert
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Shelf View Post
I really have no clue what this is supposed to mean? Trolling?
Possibly....but it could happen....I'd let it ride.

Robert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2007, 10:54 PM
  #33
predatorsdude
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Drummonds, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 42
vCash: 500
Yeah I just figured i'd ask you guys since he played well on D for you. I think he can be effective on either side of the ice.

predatorsdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2007, 08:24 PM
  #34
Langway
Moderator
Intangibles
 
Langway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21,668
vCash: 500
I know the Blue Jackets currently have some holes at center and defense but could Fedorov be moved this summer? The more I think about it the more it makes sense for the Caps to try to acquire Fedorov this summer. The Caps generally have trouble landing experienced winners via free agency and need at least a short-term fill-in to play with Ovechkin while Backstrom matures. Acquiring Fedorov this summer would give him a year to bond with and mentor the Alexanders so that he could become swayed to re-sign in DC to a more reasonable contract.

If it were to take place early enough in the offseason (around draft time), that'd free up a good chunk of payroll next year for your front office to land one of the big name free agent centers out there. (Or would the lack of depth up the middle without Fedorov, for the time being at least, and the uncertainty of free agency make for too big of an offseason gamble?) The Caps have a number of young defensemen on their roster, particularly Steve Eminger, that they might be willing to part with if that's what it takes.

Langway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-13-2007, 08:37 PM
  #35
Skraut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Enter city here
Posts: 10,347
vCash: 500
I've thought for a while that Sergei would be a good fit for the Caps. I'd love to see him work with the young Russians, but then I had higher expectations for his mentoring of Zherdev. Washington has the cap room to be able to handle his salary, and I think it would make sense for both teams, but only if Columbus uses that cap spaces to go big in the free agent market.

Skraut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2007, 11:06 PM
  #36
Mr Mac
Registered User
 
Mr Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Worthington
Country: United States
Posts: 298
vCash: 500
Fedorov's 18 goals look pretty good this year, considering how poorly his constantly revolving door of linemates did this year. On a GOOD team, he could have had 22-25 goals.

Therefore I agree with some of the posters here. It would be a bad sign next season for our playoff hopes that our defense was in such bad shape that we needed to insert Fedorov into it, and risk losing his goal totals. The problem in those 16 shutouts this past year was not our defense, it was our scoring ability.

The only way I would accept the switch permanently to D would be if there was also a commitment to ADD a forward who can produce 25 goals, in addition to the top center we already need!

Mr Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2007, 08:42 PM
  #37
Robert
Foligno family
 
Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KY & Lime Lake NY
Country: United States
Posts: 30,916
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Robert
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Mac View Post
The problem in those 16 shutouts this past year was not our defense, it was our scoring ability.
But Fedorov was a part of that offense.......along with Nash, Vyborny, Zherdev, Modin and Svitov.... most would agree Zherdev is one who helped with those shutouts but those same fans probably believe Fedorov and the remaining players are Stanely Cup quality.....can't have it both ways.....

Robert is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.