HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Nashville Predators
Notices

Roenick in Nashville?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-16-2007, 04:24 PM
  #1
jstreet
Registered User
 
jstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 7,655
vCash: 50
Roenick in Nashville?

He Who Must Not Be Named has Roenick rumoured to a couple of teams (Chicago, Nashville, Ottawa). LINK

I dont take what he says as Gospel, but I dont hate on him as is the typical HF practice.

Thinking in purely hypothetical terms, what would you think of having Roenick in a Preds uni?

Personally, I think it would be wildly entertaining to sign him to the league minimum and throw him on the third line. I dont think it would do us much good, but it would be interesting none the less.

Thoughts and opinions?

jstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2007, 04:27 PM
  #2
PredsMan
Registered User
 
PredsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 902
vCash: 500
I'd do it.

If for nothing more than his persona. It would sell tickets.

The league needs more guys with his type of personality.

PredsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2007, 04:30 PM
  #3
barrytrotzsneck
Retired Global Mod
 
barrytrotzsneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 31,027
vCash: 500
I thought he officially retired?

And..I'll pass.

He's done absolutely jack outside of getting injured on non-playoff teams for five years now.

__________________
www.thepredatorial.com

barrytrotzsneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2007, 04:30 PM
  #4
jstreet
Registered User
 
jstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 7,655
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by PredsMan View Post
I'd do it.

If for nothing more than his persona. It would sell tickets.

The league needs more guys with his type of personality.
that's what Im thinking, I dont know that it would help us on the ice, but it would sure give us plenty to talk about.

jstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2007, 04:32 PM
  #5
jstreet
Registered User
 
jstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 7,655
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomorekids View Post
I thought he officially retired?

.
probably, but if there is an ounce of attention out there somewhere to be had, he will track it down.

jstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2007, 10:39 PM
  #6
Jarnberg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 5,483
vCash: 500
No thanks.

What role would he fill on our team?

Jarnberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-16-2007, 10:49 PM
  #7
Joe T Choker
Roll Wide Roll
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Country: Italy
Posts: 23,198
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranger View Post
No thanks.

What role would he fill on our team?
he could replace Terry Crisp in the TV booth

Joe T Choker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 07:24 AM
  #8
Pattypred
Registered User
 
Pattypred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 767
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranger View Post
What role would he fill on our team?
Mouthpiece


Pattypred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 08:34 AM
  #9
RaiderDoug
Registered User
 
RaiderDoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Knoxville
Country: United States
Posts: 1,801
vCash: 500
Im 50/50 on Roenick.

I think he'd be better for what he can do off the ice than on it.

Good:

He's still a big name to casual fans. Hes got a big mouth, and we can likely use it to promote the club. His chase of 500 goals would give us alot of publicity in the hockey world as it drew near.

Bad:

He may not have any game left at all.

RaiderDoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 08:49 AM
  #10
jstreet
Registered User
 
jstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 7,655
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaiderDoug View Post
Im 50/50 on Roenick.

I think he'd be better for what he can do off the ice than on it.

Good:

He's still a big name to casual fans. Hes got a big mouth, and we can likely use it to promote the club. His chase of 500 goals would give us alot of publicity in the hockey world as it drew near.Bad:

He may not have any game left at all.
how many away is he?

jstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 09:01 AM
  #11
PredsMan
Registered User
 
PredsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 902
vCash: 500
5

PredsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 09:15 AM
  #12
BigFatCat999
I love GoOoOlD
 
BigFatCat999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Campbell, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 9,910
vCash: 500
What prevents him from scoring the 5 and pulling a John Kruk and walking away after that?

BigFatCat999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 09:20 AM
  #13
jstreet
Registered User
 
jstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 7,655
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFatCat999 View Post
What prevents him from scoring the 5 and pulling a John Kruk and walking away after that?
that'd be fine with me, we'd only use him for the publicity and hype anyway.

jstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 09:45 AM
  #14
Jarnberg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 5,483
vCash: 500
Pff, you all know that Roenick wouldn't come here to hit 500, we wouldn't honor him with a parade and game ending celebration

Jarnberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-17-2007, 10:56 AM
  #15
handtrick
Registered User
 
handtrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 3,090
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stranger View Post
Pff, you all know that Roenick wouldn't come here to hit 500, we wouldn't honor him with a parade and game ending celebration

He needs to go back to Chicago and sign for the minimum if he plays anywhere at all next year.

handtrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2007, 02:16 PM
  #16
Fantom
Registered User
 
Fantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,273
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by handtrick View Post
He needs to go back to Chicago and sign for the minimum if he plays anywhere at all next year.
Jr Retired

Fantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2007, 09:50 PM
  #17
Seth Lake
Registered User
 
Seth Lake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 8,855
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Seth Lake
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantom View Post
Jr Retired
Not yet...but for what it's worth...I hope he does.

Seth Lake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2007, 03:58 PM
  #18
jstreet
Registered User
 
jstreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: smashville
Country: United States
Posts: 7,655
vCash: 50
In addition to Roenick, Eklund now has us tied with:

1. Peter Forsberg (Nashville, Vancouver, Detroit, Philadelphia)
21. Jan Bulis (Columbus, Nashville, Pittsburgh, Wash)
32. Mike Johnson (Nashville,Phoenix, NYI, NJ)

LINK

jstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2007, 05:05 PM
  #19
Seth Lake
Registered User
 
Seth Lake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Country: United States
Posts: 8,855
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Seth Lake
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnlikestars View Post
In addition to Roenick, Eklund now has us tied with:

1. Peter Forsberg (Nashville, Vancouver, Detroit, Philadelphia)
Please, please...let it happen. It would be a great thing for Peter to return to Nashville to mentor Radulov and our other young forwards, while also being a great marketing face for our franchise.
Quote:
21. Jan Bulis (Columbus, Nashville, Pittsburgh, Wash)
No, thank you. Bulis is not the player I want to see fill in our final spot on the third line. I could live with it if he did indeed come to Nashville, but I just don't think he would rebound his career back to the 20 goal, 40+ point seasons that he has shown he is capable of while playing on our third line.
Quote:
32. Mike Johnson (Nashville,Phoenix, NYI, NJ)
Johnson is the player at the top of my wish list right now (outside of Forsberg). Good frame (6'2", 202 lbs), good speed, solid defender, and a former 20 goal scorer. I don't think he will approach 20 goals again, but could easily fit our defensive system and combine with Bonk at center to score 30-40 points from the third line position.

Quote:
LINK

Seth Lake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2007, 06:27 PM
  #20
Jarnberg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 5,483
vCash: 500
If I see another Roenick to Nashville link I'm going to throw up. He would serve absolutely no purpose here.

As for the Forsberg rumor, I hardly see us shelling out the money. Not to mention, it would mean Legwand is traded. I know everyone quickly points out that Bonk would be moved down to the 4th line, but I doubt it. Not to mention that would mean we get rid of one of Fiddler, Nichol, Smithson, Hordichuk, Tootoo, which isn't happening anytime soon. Those guys are cheap and Trotz loves them.

That being said I'd love to see Forsberg back in a Predators uniform.

Jarnberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2007, 08:30 PM
  #21
deadwing57
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10
vCash: 500
We're still 2 mil under the cap floor, but the reasoning here is what I don't understand. To sign Forsberg means we trade Legwand? Where did that one come from. Do you think Poile is an idiot or what? Why would you trade someone who is young and coming into his own, in order to sign someone that's in their last year or two in the league. I think theres a good chance of Forsberg coming back this year, but zilch on trading Legwand.

deadwing57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2007, 09:27 PM
  #22
braindead
Registered User
 
braindead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The cookie spoke
Country: Tibet
Posts: 2,759
vCash: 500
I agree re trading Legwand but I think it was more of a commentary on the difficulty in figuring how you would fit Forsberg here. Last year, it was easy to see him slotted on the "3rd" line with Hartnell and Rads to create a lethal scoring line. Our top centers were Legwand and Arnott...everyone else was fungible.

This year, signing Bonk gives you a decent 3rd center albeit with no real great scoring punch at winger for that line so it looks like either a shutdown line or there is a need to get a winger.

If Forsberg comes along, it eliminates the option of a 3rd line shutdown unless Legwand moves to it (Forsberg and Arnott will not be playing shutdown 3rd line center), which would be a waste, and it likely throws Bonk to the 4th line, which also is a waste. I'm not sure if Bonk can play wing but that may be an option. At the same time, your need to add a winger goes up even more.

I will love it if Forsberg is back but it will create some lineup issues that don't seem to be easily solved.

braindead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2007, 09:42 PM
  #23
Jarnberg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 5,483
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadwing57 View Post
To sign Forsberg means we trade Legwand? Where did that one come from. Do you think Poile is an idiot or what? Why would you trade someone who is young and coming into his own, in order to sign someone that's in their last year or two in the league. I think theres a good chance of Forsberg coming back this year, but zilch on trading Legwand.
I agree exactly with what braindead said above. I'm not advocating trading Legwand, I'm merely pointing out with our lines next year, we're probably not going to be able to do that.

Legwand has alot more trade value then Fiddler, Nichol, Smithson, etc. Plus he's a UFA after this season (yes it hurts his value some, but still way higher then the 3 mentioned above) and we have no guarantee Legwand is going to come back here.

Bonk wasn't brought here to play on the 4th line.

I'd love to have Forsberg back; he was awesome to watch and his play with Radulov made him worth the trade. However, bringing him back will force a trade in the center of the ice. And Legwand would likely be traded for our part needed on the third line, since its doubtful we sign anyone at this point.

Jarnberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-26-2007, 07:10 AM
  #24
triggrman
HFBoards Sponsor
 
triggrman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 16,935
vCash: 500
You act like Bonk is making a killing, heck he's not making that much more than Fiddler or Nichol, and according to Pederson was brought in to play the 3rd or 4th line.

triggrman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-26-2007, 08:41 AM
  #25
Jarnberg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Country: United States
Posts: 5,483
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by triggrman View Post
You act like Bonk is making a killing, heck he's not making that much more than Fiddler or Nichol, and according to Pederson was brought in to play the 3rd or 4th line.
Only about 700,000 more. The point is, we'd have too many centers. I'm not convinced some other team would actually have Fiddler, Nichol or Smithson on their team.

Jarnberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.