Backstrom only because of the D in front of him, not because of his talent.
Hence Brodeur would have a higher SV% by far if the teams were reversed.
Obviously you have never watched him play then. You are probably just going of the same mantra of the "Lemaire boring trap strategy" which makes goalies look ten times better than they are.
Why don't you watch Backstrom play before you spout such nonsense.
Obviously you have never watched him play then. You are probably just going of the same mantra of the "Lemaire boring trap strategy" which makes goalies look ten times better than they are.
Why don't you watch Backstrom play before you spout such nonsense.
Are you suggesting that Backstrom is more talented than Brodeur?
Obviously you have never watched him play then. You are probably just going of the same mantra of the "Lemaire boring trap strategy" which makes goalies look ten times better than they are.
Why don't you watch Backstrom play before you spout such nonsense.
LOL, welcome to the world of the Devils and Brodeur......just get used to it son
Are you suggesting that Backstrom is more talented than Brodeur?
No not at all. Brodeur has multiple Stanley Cups, numerous awards, and he is an Olympian. I was just responding to amnesiac's post of him saying that Backstrom successes has nothing to do with his talent.
No not at all. Brodeur has multiple Stanley Cups, numerous awards, and an Olympian. I was just responding to amnesiac's post of him saying that Backstrom successes has nothing to do with his talent..
Overreaction much?
He said that Backstrom would have a better save % than Brodeur because he has a better D in front of him than Brodeur, not because he is more talented than Brodeur. I thought it was pretty clear.
Obviously you have never watched him play then. You are probably just going of the same mantra of the "Lemaire boring trap strategy" which makes goalies look ten times better than they are.
Why don't you watch Backstrom play before you spout such nonsense.