HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Prospects
Notices

Prospects Discuss hockey prospects from all over the world and the NHL Draft.

Depth of 2004 draft crop

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-14-2004, 06:30 PM
  #1
not quite yoda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Qatar
Posts: 3,502
vCash: 500
Depth of 2004 draft crop

I remember that everyone said that the 2002 (Nash) Draft crop was one of the weakest of all- time in terms of depth. Then the 2003 (Fleury) Draft crop was one of the richest in history where good future NHL players were still plentiful in the 2nd round.

Can anyone tell me how the 2004 is looking? I know the Ovechkins, Barkers, Montoyas, Olesz and company look good... but how do the later part of the 1st round and 2nd round fair???


Last edited by not quite yoda: 01-14-2004 at 07:08 PM.
not quite yoda is offline  
Old
01-14-2004, 08:54 PM
  #2
Larry Fisher
HFB Partner
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kelowna, B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,446
vCash: 500
...

I too am interested in how this draft compares with other recent drafts as far as depth goes?

Any details or opinion?

Larry Fisher is offline  
Old
01-15-2004, 05:50 AM
  #3
Schlep Rock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,732
vCash: 500
Everyone has a different opinion as far as how the depth goes in this year's draft.

Teams are becoming better and better at getting those late round steals. Every summer I see a rising number of 6-8 rounders being signed to deals.

But as of now I think last year's depth was definitely better than this years.

Schlep Rock is offline  
Old
01-15-2004, 05:54 AM
  #4
DutchLeafsfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rotterdam, NL
Country: Netherlands
Posts: 4,905
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to DutchLeafsfan Send a message via MSN to DutchLeafsfan
From what I have heard the top end talent is supposed to be superior (Ovechkin, Olesz, Malkin and co), whereas the depth is less than 2003. Last year it wasn't so much that the players who were chosen with the first few picks were exceptionally special, but more so the depth after the top 10...

That said, projections are just that... Some supposedly weak drafts turned out to be pretty good after all, whereas for the 2003 draft it appears to be strong but hasn't been proven on the ice yet...

DutchLeafsfan is offline  
Old
01-15-2004, 06:58 AM
  #5
Jason MacIsaac
MARS Officer
 
Jason MacIsaac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Victoria, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,457
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Jason MacIsaac Send a message via Yahoo to Jason MacIsaac
This is still a really strong draft just not as good as the 03 draft. The 03 draft may turn out to be the best ever though.

Jason MacIsaac is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.