HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

Proposal: ATL-TOR

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
06-01-2008, 10:28 AM
  #1
RoyBoyCoy
Habs and Rugby
 
RoyBoyCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lennoxville, QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,084
vCash: 500
Proposal: ATL-TOR

To Toronto: '08 1st rounder (3rd overall)
To Atlanta: Kubina and '09 1st Rounder

I read that Atlanta was willing to trade there pick if what they get back includes a decent defensemen. Toronto wants to blow up their team and get rid of some cap and recieve some picks.

revisions? thoughts?

RoyBoyCoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 10:37 AM
  #2
Feyd
Registered User
 
Feyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 351
vCash: 500
No way in hell I'd trade the '09 1st. The Leafs have a good chance of ending up with a lottery pick next year. Don't throw away the chance at Tavares.

Feyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 10:39 AM
  #3
TheLeastOfTheBunch
Registered User
 
TheLeastOfTheBunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,747
vCash: 500
It is a good deal for us considering we don't know where we are going to pick in the 09 draft...

BUT, the 2009 draft features franchise players in the top 10 of the draft. And I am willing to bet we are going to have another pick in the top 7, and a good shot at the top 5 if MLSE wants a youth movement in Toronto.

TheLeastOfTheBunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 10:41 AM
  #4
mydnyte
Registered User
 
mydnyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Country: Italy
Posts: 8,718
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexandsam View Post
To Toronto: '08 1st rounder (3rd overall)
To Atlanta: Kubina and '09 1st Rounder

I read that Atlanta was willing to trade there pick if what they get back includes a decent defensemen. Toronto wants to blow up their team and get rid of some cap and recieve some picks.

revisions? thoughts?
stupid move for toronto ...Kubina should be for an extra pick, not to move up a few spots

mydnyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:15 AM
  #5
It Kills Me
Registered User
 
It Kills Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,793
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mydnyte View Post
stupid move for toronto ...Kubina should be for an extra pick, not to move up a few spots
It's for the 2009 pick. Essentially Kubina for a guaranteed 3rd overall pick, franchise player.

Plus our 2009 won't be too high cause we're trading away Kubina in this deal. (Meaning probably TOP10, but we'll also probably have a real NHL coach)

This trade will either work out great or bite us in the ass. I think it'll bite us in the ass (Like the Luongo/Niedermayer ones IIRC) cause we're the Leafs and nothing good happens to us.

It Kills Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:18 AM
  #6
Joey Hoser
Registered User
 
Joey Hoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cambridge
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,843
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Joey Hoser
I'd much rather just send Kubina to Columbus for Colorado's first.

Joey Hoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:22 AM
  #7
S2S
Registered User
 
S2S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,092
vCash: 500
A top 10 pick in next year's draft is like having a top 20 pick in this draft. Therefore no way.

S2S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:24 AM
  #8
ULF_55
Global Moderator
 
ULF_55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mountain Standard Ti
Posts: 50,177
vCash: 500
Leafs have in the past sent a lottery protected 1st. in a deal, so I could see them doing the same if they did deal 2009's first round pick.

If the pick is in the lottery, it gets deferred to the next draft.

ULF_55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:26 AM
  #9
Bills09
Registered User
 
Bills09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pickering, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,647
vCash: 500
I'd be down if the 1st was conditional, similar to the Toskala trade, if the pick is in the top 10 then it becomes a 2010 pick

Bogosian and Wilson would be a step in the right direction.

Bills09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:30 AM
  #10
It Kills Me
Registered User
 
It Kills Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,793
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SundintoSteen View Post
A top 10 pick in next year's draft is like having a top 20 pick in this draft. Therefore no way.
Probably the other way around. Supposedly the 2009 draft is comparable to the 2003 one in terms of talent.

I agree with Joey Hoser, I'd rather just move Kubina for the Colorado 1st and walk out of the 2008 draft with maybe Hodgson and Sbisa/Teubert.

It Kills Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:33 AM
  #11
John-Eric Iannicello
Hockey's Future Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Windsor
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,111
vCash: 500
Yeah at this point I don't think Toronto is in a position to "go big" in terms of going all out for a top prospect and thus having no supporting cast around him.

Build a strong foundation in this draft with the 7th overall, and like others suggested grabbing another late pick would be a better option I'd think (at this point).

__________________
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/JE_Iannicello
John-Eric Iannicello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:34 AM
  #12
S2S
Registered User
 
S2S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,092
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocolate Skittles View Post
Probably the other way around. Supposedly the 2009 draft is comparable to the 2003 one in terms of talent.

I agree with Joey Hoser, I'd rather just move Kubina for the Colorado 1st and walk out of the 2008 draft with maybe Hodgson and Sbisa/Teubert.
Yup I realized I screwed that one up, I just woke up...

S2S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 11:35 AM
  #13
TheLeastOfTheBunch
Registered User
 
TheLeastOfTheBunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,747
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SundintoSteen View Post
A top 10 pick in next year's draft is like having a top 20 pick in this draft. Therefore no way.
You have that mixed up, dude.

It's like a top 5 pick in this years draft is more like a top 10-15 pick in the 2009 draft. But in terms of depth, the 2008 draft wins by a longshot. After the top 10 of the 09 draft, the talent level REALLY drops off.

TheLeastOfTheBunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 12:31 PM
  #14
bngkiller*
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Country: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 119
vCash: 500
throw in blake and raycroft and i'll take it

bngkiller* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 12:39 PM
  #15
Smallz
Registered User
 
Smallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,057
vCash: 500
Considering that the Leafs are trying to make the GM job as marketable as possible (possibly for Burke) they don't make this deal leaving the new GM without a 1st rounder in his first year

Smallz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 01:06 PM
  #16
daethfromabove1979
Registered User
 
daethfromabove1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,741
vCash: 500
i don't see any teams moving 2009 first rounders until next years trade deadline when they know they won't have a high pick for sure

daethfromabove1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 01:48 PM
  #17
Snipeshow
Registered User
 
Snipeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Newmarket, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,374
vCash: 500
If this deal was a "If a top 10 in 2009, it gets deferred to 2010" than I'd be down. Because a Bogo and Hodgson would be a great draft, IMO.

Snipeshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 01:50 PM
  #18
Porn*
Registered User
 
Porn*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In your nightmares
Country: Israel
Posts: 31,934
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Porn*
PASS.


i'd move kubina for a mid 1st...

i have zero interest in moving our 09'

Porn* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 01:55 PM
  #19
Jeffler
Ontario's Very Own
 
Jeffler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Downsview
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,604
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Jeffler
I love Kubina and this is a flat out yes.

People here are total Pessimists, it seems. This leafs team is not a lottery team. Not even close.

The rough start and Paul Maurice's questionable coaching killed the Maple Leafs this year. By late November the team went into a "**** it" mode.

With a semi-competent coach the leafs will be no lower than 12th pick next year. And thats to keep you pessimists happy. I'm not saying the Leafs are cup contenders but I do believe with some slight reworking done (which still kinda counts as rebuilding, I'm refering to trimming the fat, aka Blake/Tucker/Raycroft..), this team very well could get into the playoffs next year.

So I see this as what do I want more? Bogosian, and chance at Pieterangelo or Schenn, or the very same chance, Kubina, and a higher mid-1st?

I take this trade in a heartbeat. You might think differently, but this move makes more sense in terms of rebuilding than not taking it IMO.

Jeffler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 02:04 PM
  #20
LeafErikson*
Ice to meet you
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Victoria B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,223
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULF_55 View Post
Leafs have in the past sent a lottery protected 1st. in a deal, so I could see them doing the same if they did deal 2009's first round pick.

If the pick is in the lottery, it gets deferred to the next draft.
Different man at the helm though, so different philosophy. I wouldn't expect JFJ, and Fletcher operate on the same line of thinking.

LeafErikson* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 02:54 PM
  #21
It Kills Me
Registered User
 
It Kills Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,793
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverse Flying V View Post
I take this trade in a heartbeat. You might think differently, but this move makes more sense in terms of rebuilding than not taking it IMO.
I'm thinking about it and either way I'm fine. If you think Filatov is the type of player you can build your team around have as the cornerstone then sure.

Kubina and our 2009 1st rounder for Filatov. Sure we may not have a TOP10 pick next year but we've got a prospect that surely would be. I don't think our pick next year will be better then Filatov.

If we do the deal, we'd already have a nucleus of prospects to build with. Filatov, Hodgson, Kulemin, Tlusty, Stralman, and Pogge. We could start development part of rebuilding.

It Kills Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 03:04 PM
  #22
RoyBoyCoy
Habs and Rugby
 
RoyBoyCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lennoxville, QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,084
vCash: 500
good

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bills09 View Post
I'd be down if the 1st was conditional, similar to the Toskala trade, if the pick is in the top 10 then it becomes a 2010 pick

Bogosian and Wilson would be a step in the right direction.
good idea

RoyBoyCoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 03:09 PM
  #23
RoyBoyCoy
Habs and Rugby
 
RoyBoyCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lennoxville, QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,084
vCash: 500
exactly

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocolate Skittles View Post
I'm thinking about it and either way I'm fine. If you think Filatov is the type of player you can build your team around have as the cornerstone then sure.

Kubina and our 2009 1st rounder for Filatov. Sure we may not have a TOP10 pick next year but we've got a prospect that surely would be. I don't think our pick next year will be better then Filatov.

If we do the deal, we'd already have a nucleus of prospects to build with. Filatov, Hodgson, Kulemin, Tlusty, Stralman, and Pogge. We could start development part of rebuilding.
exactly the more prospects with potential the Leafs can rake in the better

RoyBoyCoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 03:23 PM
  #24
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 18,363
vCash: 500
Next years draft is better than this years, so no.

mapes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-01-2008, 04:02 PM
  #25
bngkiller*
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Country: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 119
vCash: 500
put a top 10 prot on the pick next year and i'd do it but atlanta probably will not, it would be sick though, bogs and filitov

bngkiller* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.