Quote:
Originally Posted by dulzhok
Yep. All three are better than Zidlicky and Devries in their own zone. Cullimore and Miller were solid this year. Eaton, because he's missed time, will go for a low price.
|
And Zidlicky is lightyears ahead of all three in the offensive zone. Our anemic power play needs him back there (preferably with Koistinen manning the other point) and there's no way you find a defenseman with his ability at that price on the open market.
De Vries is old and slow... so is Aaron Miller. Miller also played just 57 games and got 20 minutes or more just 11 times. That means he was normally a 5-6th defenseman, but more likely a 7th who got more minutes because of injuries. And knowing Trotz he would probably get paired with Hamhuis resulting in next to no change in the lineup.
Cullimore might actually be a good signing... for Milwaukee. Cullimore was lucky to get 20 minutes a night up until the last 10 games of the season and was part of one of the worst overall D corps in the NHL. A big part of the reason he got as much ice time as he did was the loss of Cory Murphy and Mark van Ryn. He's just another 5-6th defenseman.
Eaton is too much of a risk. He's a great shut-down guy when he's on the ice but he's played 71 games in 2 years. I would be willing to wager he maintains that average again this year, and I don't want to plonk down $2M on someone that has a high chance of spending half the season or more in street clothes.
So you think Salvador is a glorified 5/6th, and you think we should go out and get Miller or Cullimore, who are both 5/6th defensemen? Hello, pot? This is the kettle, do you read?
I agree with Dave, Orpik would be a great pickup, but we'll have to outbid just about every other team in the NHL, especially the Rangers who've already expressed a great deal of interest in signing Orpik in 26 days...