HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Rick Nash to SJ

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-28-2008, 07:55 PM
  #1
bigwillie
Registered User
 
bigwillie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Country: United States
Posts: 5,769
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to bigwillie
Rick Nash to SJ

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I am fully aware that the likelihood of Rick Nash being traded is pretty much zero. But, if for some insane reason he was on the market, how does this deal look?

To SJS: Rick Nash

To CBJ: Milan Michalek, Matt Carle, Ty Wishart, 1st

bigwillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:02 PM
  #2
X0ssbar
 
X0ssbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ...on a star!
Country: United States
Posts: 13,011
vCash: 500
How about:

To CBJ: Joe Thornton

To SJS: Nikolai Zherdev, Rusty Klesla, Gilbert Brule, 19th

X0ssbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:06 PM
  #3
TrueGrit
Registered User
 
TrueGrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,568
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top Shelf View Post
How about:

To CBJ: Joe Thornton

To SJS: Nikolai Zherdev, Rusty Klesla, Gilbert Brule, 19th
why would you even post this?

TrueGrit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:08 PM
  #4
Matthew
F.A.R.T on Mike Todd
 
Matthew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Country: United States
Posts: 7,306
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Matthew
How about I just pour a bucket of acid on my head?

Matthew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:09 PM
  #5
Frenzy1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,797
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starnators Fan View Post
why would you even post this?
Response to a crap proposal.

Frenzy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:10 PM
  #6
heusy_79
! kool uoy edam
 
heusy_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,894
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starnators Fan View Post
why would you even post this?
Because Nash probably has more value than Thornton, and he still offered up a better package than the original proposal.

heusy_79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:15 PM
  #7
Jovavic
Lose to CBJ?
 
Jovavic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ClosedDoorMeeting
Country: Qatar
Posts: 10,714
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Jovavic
Yea...that one is pretty bad. TS was just making fun of it using similar players, turn your sarcasim meter on.

Jovavic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:31 PM
  #8
chef223
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 556
vCash: 500
How about :

To Toronto:
Rick Nash

To Columbus:
Kaberle, Steen and a first round pick ( plus a prospect)

chef223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:31 PM
  #9
Chayos
Registered User
 
Chayos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Whitehorse, Yukon
Posts: 2,683
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwillie View Post
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I am fully aware that the likelihood of Rick Nash being traded is pretty much zero. But, if for some insane reason he was on the market, how does this deal look?

To SJS: Rick Nash

To CBJ: Milan Michalek, Matt Carle, Ty Wishart, 1st

To be fair it might look more like this.

Nash for Marleau, Michalek, Matt Carle and the 1st.

Chayos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:31 PM
  #10
kmad
Riot Survivor
 
kmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 31,826
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starnators Fan View Post
why would you even post this?
The OP started it.

kmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 08:50 PM
  #11
X0ssbar
 
X0ssbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ...on a star!
Country: United States
Posts: 13,011
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oz View Post
Yea...that one is pretty bad. TS was just making fun of it using similar players, turn your sarcasim meter on.
I thought it was pretty obvious....apparently not.

X0ssbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 09:00 PM
  #12
OrrNumber4
Registered User
 
OrrNumber4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 7,402
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by heusy_79 View Post
Because Nash probably has more value than Thornton, and he still offered up a better package than the original proposal.

OrrNumber4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 09:01 PM
  #13
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 31,593
vCash: 2283
I wouldn't want to trade for Rick Nash. Anyone who does will be significantly worse off because that'll be the price to get him. Just wait until he gets to free agency...if he gets to free agency. Any other time is just simply not worth it if you are a team trying to compete.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 09:52 PM
  #14
Splitbtw
Rebuild? Refresh?
 
Splitbtw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,787
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chayos1 View Post
To be fair it might look more like this.

Nash for Marleau, Michalek, Matt Carle and the 1st.

While we're at it, toss in Goc and I'm sold. Plus that becomes more than enough salary to resign Campbell, and pick up serviceable replacements if the young guys can't hack it in the top 6

Splitbtw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 09:57 PM
  #15
Lunatik*
 
Lunatik*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lethbridge
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,918
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chef223 View Post
How about :

To Toronto:
Rick Nash

To Columbus:
Kaberle, Steen and a first round pick ( plus a prospect)
I think this proposal sounds pretty decent for the Blue Jackets... although their already weak offense would lose all of its bite

Lunatik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 11:40 PM
  #16
KenAF
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,421
vCash: 500
Rick Nash is a 100pt player on most NHL teams.

Thornton would not come close to his SJ stats in Columbus.

KenAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 11:42 PM
  #17
Nizdizzle
Salary cap? Huh?
 
Nizdizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,184
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenAF View Post
Rick Nash is a 100pt player on most NHL teams.

Thornton would not come close to his SJ stats in Columbus.
Really? On Columbus he isn't a 70pt player...

Joe Thornton (on Boston)
GP G A Pts
1999–00 Boston Bruins NHL 81 23 37 60
2000–01 Boston Bruins NHL 72 37 34 71
2001–02 Boston Bruins NHL 66 22 46 68
2002–03 Boston Bruins NHL 77 36 65 101
2003–04 Boston Bruins NHL 77 23 50 73

I'm pretty sure he can put up "Rick Nash numbers" in Columbus

Nizdizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 11:46 PM
  #18
Michael Scott*
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scranton
Posts: 2,052
vCash: 500
San Jose gets robbed on this deal.

Michael Scott* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 11:49 PM
  #19
Anthony*
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,157
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by heusy_79 View Post
Nash probably has more value than Thornton
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenAF View Post
Rick Nash is a 100pt player on most NHL teams.

Thornton would not come close to his SJ stats in Columbus.

Anthony* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-28-2008, 11:50 PM
  #20
bananaz
Registered User
 
bananaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,028
vCash: 500
it definitely will not be worth any teams while to try and pry rick nash out of clb. he's vastly over-rated right now.

bananaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2008, 12:22 AM
  #21
KenAF
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,421
vCash: 500
Joe Thornton led the NHL with 103 giveaways. Does that mean he sucks? No, it just means he is expected and allowed to carry the puck through the neutral zone on a regular basis.

Can you guess how many giveaways Nash had? 30. That's right, Nash had just 30 giveaways in 80 games. Even players like Morrow, Iginla, Getzlaf, Datsyuk, Jagr, Lecavalier, and Kovalev had 65-75 giveaways. Nash is good with the puck, but the real reason for that number is the Columbus system.

Columbus does not allow players to skate the puck in through the neutral zone; Nash and other Columbus players are required to dump the puck in at all times. It should be fairly obvious what effect that has on stats. If you still have doubts, consider that Columbus had the fewest 5v5 goals and fewest 5v5 assists of any team in the NHL. San Jose had roughly 20 more 5v5 goals and 35 more 5v5 assists than Columbus. Columbus scored less total goals and had less total assists than every other team except the NY Islanders (NYI had one less goal). In 5v5, the Devils looked like an offensive powerhouse compared to the Blue Jackets.

On Canada's national team, Rick Nash had 6 goals and 7 assists in 9 games with a +9.

KenAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2008, 12:24 AM
  #22
deanosaur
Registered User
 
deanosaur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AB/MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,090
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chef223 View Post
How about :

To Toronto:
Rick Nash

To Columbus:
Kaberle, Steen and a first round pick ( plus a prospect)
Haha Kaberle, Steen, and a 1st gets you leafs any player in the league right?

deanosaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2008, 01:58 AM
  #23
Blane Youngblood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,469
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwillie View Post
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I am fully aware that the likelihood of Rick Nash being traded is pretty much zero. But, if for some insane reason he was on the market, how does this deal look?

To SJS: Rick Nash

To CBJ: Milan Michalek, Matt Carle, Ty Wishart, 1st
If I'm CBJ I'd seriously consider that offer.

p.s. Thornton is way better then Nash and Michalek isn't that far behind (when contract status is considered).

Blane Youngblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2008, 02:03 AM
  #24
TrappedInFullerton
Murray SMASH
 
TrappedInFullerton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 13,391
vCash: 500
I'd LOVE Nash on the Sharks, he and Thornton played together in the Lockout year and were quiet good together, but the trade proposal made in the OP is ridiculous lol

TrappedInFullerton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-29-2008, 02:04 AM
  #25
krudmonk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sannozay
Posts: 5,509
vCash: 500
How about...

To SJ: Rich Nash

To Columbus: the Sharks

krudmonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.