HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

NYI-SJ: The Patrick Marleau Sweepstakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
06-14-2008, 07:40 PM
  #1
DisplacedIslander
Back Up The Trucks
 
DisplacedIslander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Main Line
Country: Italy
Posts: 3,402
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to DisplacedIslander
NYI-SJ: The Patrick Marleau Sweepstakes

Given the fact that Eklund has said it, I thought I'd run it up the flagpole and see who salutes it, while I watch to see if any of my fellow comrades in arms will start throwing rocks at me for selling the future down the river:

To NYI:

Patrick Marleau

To SJ:

Jeff Tambellini
Prospect a la Kohn/Colliton/Nielsen/Katic
2nd round pick '08
2nd round pick '09

Before I let the flamers have at it, keep in mind Brad Richards was moved without a 1st round pick being exchanged, hence the reason why I excluded it. This time around, teams are going to want the future right now for a 1st round pick.

Let the flaming begin...

DisplacedIslander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 07:43 PM
  #2
WeSt_CoAsT_eXpReSs
Registered User
 
WeSt_CoAsT_eXpReSs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Surrey. B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 347
vCash: 500
I think San Jose would be looking for something proven if they didn't get a 1st round pick ....

WeSt_CoAsT_eXpReSs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 07:52 PM
  #3
heusy_79
! kool ouy edam
 
heusy_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,468
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisplacedIslander View Post
Given the fact that Eklund has said it, I thought I'd run it up the flagpole and see who salutes it, while I watch to see if any of my fellow comrades in arms will start throwing rocks at me for selling the future down the river:

To NYI:

Patrick Marleau

To SJ:

Jeff Tambellini
Prospect a la Kohn/Colliton/Nielsen/Katic
2nd round pick '08
2nd round pick '09

Before I let the flamers have at it, keep in mind Brad Richards was moved without a 1st round pick being exchanged, hence the reason why I excluded it. This time around, teams are going to want the future right now for a 1st round pick.

Let the flaming begin...
Not terrible but not enough. Even with his monstrous contract, Richards still got Tampa a starting goalie (Smith), a young top 6 winger (Jokinen) and a good two-way top 9 center (Halpern). Marleau could fetch more than an unproven young player, a second rate prospect and a couple second rounders.

heusy_79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 07:53 PM
  #4
NYRKing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 105
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeSt_CoAsT_eXpReSs View Post
I think San Jose would be looking for something proven if they didn't get a 1st round pick ....
Exactly. Dallas gave up Mike Smith and Jussi Jokinen, two solid young guys. I think the isles would need to throw in a first rounder unless they were willing to give up okposo or comeau which they won't

NYRKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 08:00 PM
  #5
dubey
x
 
dubey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,612
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisplacedIslander View Post
Before I let the flamers have at it, keep in mind Brad Richards was moved without a 1st round pick being exchanged, hence the reason why I excluded it. This time around, teams are going to want the future right now for a 1st round pick.
The only difference is Tampa Bay got some quality players in return.

dubey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 08:01 PM
  #6
boredmale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18,449
vCash: 500
I can't see Islanders and San Jose making good partners. Other then first round draft picks or Okposo the only thing we could offer is a package like Witt + Hunter + something(which would basically gut out the team).

Trading for Marleau would be stupid as well because he has 2 years left on his contract and good chance he will just bolt then and we left empty handed.

boredmale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 08:03 PM
  #7
hlundqvist30*
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,523
vCash: 500
Hunter, Comeau, 2nd, 4th for Marleau. Not sure it makes sense from the Isles' standpoint but in my eyes it seems fair value wise. If I'm totally off please feel free to bash me and let me know.

hlundqvist30* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 08:30 PM
  #8
bruinsfreak72
 
bruinsfreak72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,052
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYRKing View Post
Exactly. Dallas gave up Mike Smith and Jussi Jokinen, two solid young guys. I think the isles would need to throw in a first rounder unless they were willing to give up okposo or comeau which they won't
Difference is they got that at the trade deadline,if San Jose wants to rid themselves of Marleau they only have til July 1st so they might have to take what they can get,I really don't think Marleau would bring back a great package at all.

This deal doesn't seem that far off to me.Actually I think it would be silly for the Islanders not to send a bad contract back(if they have any)


Last edited by bruinsfreak72: 06-14-2008 at 08:40 PM.
bruinsfreak72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 08:35 PM
  #9
Woodman19
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
Woodman19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,066
vCash: 500
I would assume San Jose would want some building blocks for now seeing as they are so close


I would say more like a team who is willing to give up a good stay at home defender who can eat alot of minutes, oh and is not to old

Woodman19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 08:36 PM
  #10
boredmale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18,449
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruinsfreak72 View Post
Difference is they got that at the trade deadline,if San Jose wants to rid themselves of Marleau they only have til July 1st so they might have to take what they can get,I really don't think Marleau would bring back a great package at all.
I guess that sort of true as well. Who thought Tanguay would go for so little a few years back, could be a similar deal like that. I have to think Marleau's value somewhat similar to Tanguay when he was traded(if not slightly less)

boredmale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:04 PM
  #11
Hold the Pickles
Registered User
 
Hold the Pickles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Double Q
Country: United States
Posts: 2,827
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
I would assume San Jose would want some building blocks for now seeing as they are so close...
, nice sarcasm for someone with 5 posts. And it wasn't necessary to use a "". Nicely played.

Hold the Pickles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:10 PM
  #12
Sniper Archetype
RIP Локомотив
 
Sniper Archetype's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 15,356
vCash: 500
Trading for Marleau is going to require a first round pick or combo of solid players. Why do Sharks need prospects and junk?

Sniper Archetype is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:13 PM
  #13
Woodman19
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
Woodman19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperArchetype View Post
Trading for Marleau is going to require a first round pick or combo of solid players. Why do Sharks need prospects and junk?
Do you want Kubina for Marleau?

Woodman19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:15 PM
  #14
5H4RK5
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,531
vCash: 500
We better get some Russians damnit. j/k We are not trading Marleau UNLESS we get the most ridiculous offer ever that would make Doug faint.

5H4RK5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:15 PM
  #15
bruinsfreak72
 
bruinsfreak72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,052
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperArchetype View Post
Trading for Marleau is going to require a first round pick or combo of solid players. Why do Sharks need prospects and junk?
A lower first rounder maybe but a combo of solid players?I doubt it

bruinsfreak72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:23 PM
  #16
NewtJorden
Sharks/Packers Fan
 
NewtJorden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rimouski
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,830
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to NewtJorden
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisplacedIslander View Post
Given the fact that Eklund has said it, I thought I'd run it up the flagpole and see who salutes it, while I watch to see if any of my fellow comrades in arms will start throwing rocks at me for selling the future down the river:

To NYI:

Patrick Marleau

To SJ:

Jeff Tambellini
Prospect a la Kohn/Colliton/Nielsen/Katic
2nd round pick '08
2nd round pick '09

Before I let the flamers have at it, keep in mind Brad Richards was moved without a 1st round pick being exchanged, hence the reason why I excluded it. This time around, teams are going to want the future right now for a 1st round pick.

Let the flaming begin...
Not enough

NewtJorden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:26 PM
  #17
Woodman19
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
Woodman19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,066
vCash: 500
I have to say,

as an outsider to the Sharks franchise, I must admit I do not value Marleau as much as I would of last offseason.

His season was subpar, and his playoffs were even worse.


I think I would be looking at him as a lower tier 2nd liner and you should be looking at him as a Salary dump, as such I dont think you can expect as much as you seem to think. that offer involving Jeff Tambellini and picks I think is a great overvalue for Marleau

Edit: My trade proposal of Kubina for Marleau makes alot of sense for me

1: Ron Wilson is the Leafs new coach and there is a familiarity there
2: The Amount of each player counting against the cap are relatively equal (4.5 Mil - 5 Mil)
3: San Jose gets what it needs, A solid Minute eating Defender (likely replacing Campbell) and the Leafs get what they need, a Legitimate 2nd line center

It basically breaks down to 2 teams trading a strength to upgrade a weakness
thoughts?


Last edited by Woodman19: 06-14-2008 at 09:31 PM.
Woodman19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:30 PM
  #18
DisplacedIslander
Back Up The Trucks
 
DisplacedIslander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Main Line
Country: Italy
Posts: 3,402
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to DisplacedIslander
The likelihood IMO of Marleau getting moved before Friday is slim to nil, so this year's picks should probably be out altogether of any deal. That being said, with a 1st from next year's draft (which from the Islanders could possibly be worth it's weight in gold) thrown in instead of 2 2nd's, then how does the deal look?

Edit: This does not mean I condone the trading of a 1st in '09.


Last edited by DisplacedIslander: 06-14-2008 at 09:35 PM.
DisplacedIslander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:32 PM
  #19
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 23,206
vCash: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperArchetype View Post
Trading for Marleau is going to require a first round pick or combo of solid players. Why do Sharks need prospects and junk?
From an article I read SJ wants to get more physical,grittier for the postseason.
They want to send a message in their lockerroom that the laid back days are over.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:32 PM
  #20
bruinsfreak72
 
bruinsfreak72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,052
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
I have to say,

as an outsider to the Sharks franchise, I must admit I do not value Marleau as much as I would of last offseason.

His season was subpar, and his playoffs were even worse.


I think I would be looking at him as a lower tier 2nd liner and you should be looking at him as a Salary dump, as such I dont think you can expect as much as you seem to think. that offer involving Jeff Tambellini and picks I think is a great overvalue for Marleau
My thoughts exactly I think if Marleau gets dealt Sharks fans are going to be disapointed about the return.

But I mean Marleau is coming off of a bad season is going to be making over 6million for the next 2 seasons and there is a timeline he has to be dealt in,this is the lowest his value has ever been.Marleau is really only a salary dump every GM knows this so unless a GM really really likes Marleau and i willing to do whatever it takes to get him I really cant see Marleau bringing back a big return

bruinsfreak72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:35 PM
  #21
Woodman19
BJ Elitist/Hipster
 
Woodman19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruinsfreak72 View Post
My thoughts exactly I think if Marleau gets dealt Sharks fans are going to be disapointed about the return.

But I mean Marleau is coming off of a bad season is going to be making over 6million for the next 2 seasons and there is a timeline he has to be dealt in,this is the lowest his value has ever been.Marleau is really only a salary dump every GM knows this so unless a GM really really likes Marleau and i willing to do whatever it takes to get him I really cant see Marleau bringing back a big return
as a Leafs fan, I would be willing to accept Marleau if San Jose will take Kubina off my hands

Kubina will score 40-50 points, play 25 minutes a game, and plays a physical game.

To pay for it, I would let Sundin walk as a free agent, and Begin the rebuilding process.

Woodman19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:37 PM
  #22
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 23,206
vCash: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by DisplacedIslander View Post
The likelihood IMO of Marleau getting moved before Friday is slim to nil, so this year's picks should probably be out altogether of any deal. That being said, with a 1st from next year's draft (which from the Islanders could possibly be worth it's weight in gold) thrown in instead of 2 2nd's, then how does the deal look?
Not very promising.Even if Marleau's willing to sign that all important extension before the deal's completed,I'd hope Snow would refuse to put next yr's #1 on the table.


DiPi's coming off his 2nd hip surgery and the fans have been told that next yr's team will be younger.Not a promising combination.I wouldn't be surprised at another lottery pick.I believe Hedman and Taveres (sp) will be available in next yr's draft.

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:39 PM
  #23
bruinsfreak72
 
bruinsfreak72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,052
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
as a Leafs fan, I would be willing to accept Marleau if San Jose will take Kubina off my hands

Kubina will score 40-50 points, play 25 minutes a game, and plays a physical game.

To pay for it, I would let Sundin walk as a free agent, and Begin the rebuilding process.
Well that would make sense if I was a GM the only way I would take Marleau if SJ took a fairly big contract back as well,unless it was a team that needed Marleau's salary to just make it to the cap floor then I guess they could live with the contract.

bruinsfreak72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:40 PM
  #24
DisplacedIslander
Back Up The Trucks
 
DisplacedIslander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Main Line
Country: Italy
Posts: 3,402
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to DisplacedIslander
Quote:
Originally Posted by CREW99AW View Post
Not very promising.Even if Marleau's willing to sign that all important extension before the deal's completed,I'd hope Snow would refuse to put next yr's #1 on the table.


DiPi's coming off his 2nd hip surgery and the fans have been told that next yr's team will be younger.Not a promising combination.I wouldn't be surprised at another lottery pick.I believe Hedman and Tavares will be available in next yr's draft.
I'd hope for the same thing too, but it's hard to predict what's going to happen next in the monkeyhouse sometimes. And a shot at Tavares or Hedman in next year's draft is too much to pass up, or to give away.

DisplacedIslander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-14-2008, 09:41 PM
  #25
bigwillie
Registered User
 
bigwillie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Humboldt
Country: United States
Posts: 5,386
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to bigwillie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
His season was subpar, and his playoffs were even worse.


I don't even know what to say. You are so incredibly wrong it hurts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
I think I would be looking at him as a lower tier 2nd liner and you should be looking at him as a Salary dump, as such I dont think you can expect as much as you seem to think. that offer involving Jeff Tambellini and picks I think is a great overvalue for Marleau


Lower tier second line center?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
1: Ron Wilson is the Leafs new coach and there is a familiarity there
Good lord. From all accounts, Ron Wilson and Patrick Marleau hate each other.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
2: The Amount of each player counting against the cap are relatively equal (4.5 Mil - 5 Mil)
Marleau has a new contract worth 6.7.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodman19 View Post
3: San Jose gets what it needs, A solid Minute eating Defender (likely replacing Campbell) and the Leafs get what they need, a Legitimate 2nd line center
If Marleau were to be traded, it would most likely be to dump salary so they can resign Campbell.

Not to be a dick, but damn. Read up, son.

bigwillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.