HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Boston - Columbus

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-24-2008, 03:00 PM
  #1
Selanne08*
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,899
vCash: 500
Boston - Columbus

CBJ gets:

P. Bergeron
T. Rask
1st 09
1st 10

BOS gets:
Rick Nash


Close value wise?

Selanne08* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:03 PM
  #2
Ludicrous Speed
Registered User
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Killumbus
Country: Micronesia
Posts: 11,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selanne08 View Post
CBJ gets:

P. Bergeron
T. Rask
1st 09
1st 10

BOS gets:
Rick Nash


Close value wise?
It's pretty close value wise, although we have no need for Rask. Replace him with Lashoff. Rick Nash isn't a guy I'm anywhere near considering trading, but I'd love me some Patrice Bergeron if he can come back.

Ludicrous Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:04 PM
  #3
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
No thanks. Nash (although he hasn't had a great surrounding cast) hasn't put up numbers to warrant this kind of return. 2 Franchise players AND 2 first round picks for a guy who has a career high 69 points. I'll pass.

Nikita Filatov* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:05 PM
  #4
spot
Registered User
 
spot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,574
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selanne08 View Post
CBJ gets:

P. Bergeron
T. Rask
1st 09
1st 10

BOS gets:
Rick Nash


Close value wise?

I'd say value wise pretty good proposal. However if I were Howson I would wait one year to see what the possible effects could be with Bergeron and his concussion. Please revert back to last year and Jarret Stoll

spot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:14 PM
  #5
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
The bruins don't even consider this. If they wanted to trade for nash it would probably be a package with Kessel....Not a package with our 2 franchise players. If Rask is traded were stuck with a goaltending prospect who....well, he's not Rask. Nash is one of my top 5 favorite NHL players, but for what he's done there is no way he should get this kind of return.

Nikita Filatov* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:16 PM
  #6
Sportacus
:)
 
Sportacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,683
vCash: 500
IMO, Boston gets the short end of the stick here.

__________________
Based on Japanese History
Sportacus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:18 PM
  #7
WhiteTrashAmerican
WHY DID IT END
 
WhiteTrashAmerican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,575
vCash: 500
No way, that is some desperate overrating of Rick Nash.

WhiteTrashAmerican is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:21 PM
  #8
duckchobbins
Registered User
 
duckchobbins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 24,944
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloveSave View Post
No way, that is some desperate overrating of Rick Nash.
winner.

this is awful on all accounts.

duckchobbins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:22 PM
  #9
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,790
vCash: 500
People here should just stop making proposals with their favourite team and Boston. Every single one of them have been terrible.

Vic Rattlehead* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:23 PM
  #10
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
People here should just stop making proposals with their favourite team and Boston. Every single one of them have been terrible.
Hey! According to some since Bergeron was hurt he should be given away.

Nikita Filatov* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:25 PM
  #11
DelVecchio
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,054
vCash: 500
Cbus gets nothing they want out of this deal. HF value wise they may win; But in the NHL GMs don't trade for value. They trade to improve their team.

Assuming a full recovery, Bergeron will be a very good player. Nash IS right now a franchise player. Cbus has LeClaire. Why do they want a potentially good goalie? What do they do with those draft picks? They can't score, they can't defend, they can't sell tickets.
If you think Nash would help Boston, offer something that will improve Cbus now, not in 2013.

DelVecchio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:27 PM
  #12
STRANGE VICTORY
Registered User
 
STRANGE VICTORY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Country: Iceland
Posts: 4,666
vCash: 500
This just doesn't make sense for Boston, Bergeron is the face of our franchise one on one with a little extra from Boston like maybe 1 first round pick would be fine. Rask is projected by HF to have the talent to be a top 5 goalie in the NHL some day. two first round picks are important in the Modern NHL where you cant sign a team, although the Rangers sure try.

STRANGE VICTORY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:29 PM
  #13
STRANGE VICTORY
Registered User
 
STRANGE VICTORY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Country: Iceland
Posts: 4,666
vCash: 500
How about

Marco Sturm
Phil Kessel
Brad Marchand

for

Rick Nash

STRANGE VICTORY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:31 PM
  #14
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
Quote:
Originally Posted by TampBear View Post
How about

Marco Sturm
Phil Kessel
Brad Marchand

for

Rick Nash
I think Marchand would have to be changed with Hamil...

Nikita Filatov* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:39 PM
  #15
STRANGE VICTORY
Registered User
 
STRANGE VICTORY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Country: Iceland
Posts: 4,666
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruinsfan1 View Post
I think Marchand would have to be changed with Hamil...
You might be right, Hamil would definitely make it easier.

STRANGE VICTORY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:40 PM
  #16
Mr Shanahan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,013
vCash: 500
I could see this Nash to Bruins thing working out (although it would suck because we play them 6 times a year). Anyways, if the Bruins wanted Nash, they should give up their 1st round pick.

The Bruins with Nash would definitely not be low in the standings. They would be competing with Montreal for the top of the division. If they gave up their 1st rounder, they wouldn't lose any key players.

Maybe their 1st, Sturm and a prospect or two would get CBJ to bite.

But for the 1st proposal..

Mr Shanahan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:42 PM
  #17
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
Quote:
Originally Posted by TampBear View Post
You might be right, Hamil would definitely make it easier.
I think even I might be overrating Nash here. Zherdev had pretty similar numbers (8 less points) and didn't get a great return.

Nikita Filatov* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:43 PM
  #18
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
Quote:
Originally Posted by TML4ever View Post
I could see this Nash to Bruins thing working out (although it would suck because we play them 6 times a year). Anyways, if the Bruins wanted Nash, they should give up their 1st round pick.

The Bruins with Nash would definitely not be low in the standings. They would be competing with Montreal for the top of the division. If they gave up their 1st rounder, they wouldn't lose any key players.

Maybe their 1st, Sturm and a prospect or two would get CBJ to bite.

But for the 1st proposal..
I'd be fine giving up the 1st, but i'm not sure if Chia does it since we already don't have a second.

Nikita Filatov* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:50 PM
  #19
Ludicrous Speed
Registered User
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Killumbus
Country: Micronesia
Posts: 11,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TampBear View Post
How about

Marco Sturm
Phil Kessel
Brad Marchand

for

Rick Nash
you guys may have gotten a bad deal for Thornton, but that doesn't mean we're that stupid. That's a horrible deal.

And Hamil instead of Marchand wouldn't make it better, hell, adding Hamil to that deal wouldn't make it much better.

Ludicrous Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:51 PM
  #20
DamonDRW
Registered User
 
DamonDRW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Tampere, Finland
Country: Finland
Posts: 1,560
vCash: 500
Lets check. What is about Kronwall for Nash straight.... Is there anybody to bite?

DamonDRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:51 PM
  #21
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitbasketer743 View Post
you guys may have gotten a bad deal for Thornton, but that doesn't mean we're that stupid. That's a horrible deal.

And Hamil instead of Marchand wouldn't make it better, hell, adding Hamil to that deal wouldn't make it much better.
Wait....But the OP was "close value-wise"

Nikita Filatov* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:56 PM
  #22
Ludicrous Speed
Registered User
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Killumbus
Country: Micronesia
Posts: 11,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TML4ever View Post
I could see this Nash to Bruins thing working out (although it would suck because we play them 6 times a year). Anyways, if the Bruins wanted Nash, they should give up their 1st round pick.

The Bruins with Nash would definitely not be low in the standings. They would be competing with Montreal for the top of the division. If they gave up their 1st rounder, they wouldn't lose any key players.

Maybe their 1st, Sturm and a prospect or two would get CBJ to bite.

But for the 1st proposal..

but your proposal..

Ludicrous Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 03:57 PM
  #23
Ludicrous Speed
Registered User
 
Ludicrous Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Killumbus
Country: Micronesia
Posts: 11,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruinsfan1 View Post
Wait....But the OP was "close value-wise"
that's because we get more!

EDIT: I don't want Rask. We've got Leclaire and Mason. So that part didn't even matter to me.

Ludicrous Speed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 04:45 PM
  #24
Dr Quincy
Registered User
 
Dr Quincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 16,925
vCash: 500
That's quite a lot Boston is giving up. Columbus fans, what 1 player would you be willing to give up:

09 #1
10 #1
Leclaire
Voracek for??

maybe you think that's worth more than what Boston is giving up, but really it's pretty close. You are talking about a young established player who is one of the cornerstones of the team (Leclaire/Bergeron), the #1 prospect of the team (Voracek/Rask) and 2 #1s. Whether you think those 4 Columbus assets are worth more is irrelevant because that really is the comparable type of package you are asking Boston to give up. That's quite a lot, and more than I'd be willing to give.

Dr Quincy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2008, 05:09 PM
  #25
kmad
Riot Survivor
 
kmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,034
vCash: 500
Columbus does not trade Rick Nash.

kmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.