HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Bos-pit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
10-19-2008, 10:41 AM
  #26
Crosberry87
Registered User
 
Crosberry87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,683
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4ORRBRUIN View Post
My god talk about overrated? I would not do M.L. for Stall streight up. Let alone add P.K. The Pens can keep Stall, A big no-way from me.

Who is this Stall you speak of?

Crosberry87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 10:43 AM
  #27
AK
Registered User
 
AK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 15,525
vCash: 500
Pretty fair value wise, but I don't know think the Pens want to give up Whitney.

How about Staal and a 2nd?

But then the Bruins probably wouldn't do it.

It hurts the defensive depth of the Pens, and the offensive depth of the Bruins.

AK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 10:53 AM
  #28
Kosikarzzz
Registered User
 
Kosikarzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Windsor
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,202
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Kosikarzzz Send a message via Skype™ to Kosikarzzz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letang58 View Post
Pretty fair value wise, but I don't know think the Pens want to give up Whitney.

How about Staal and a 2nd?

But then the Bruins probably wouldn't do it.

It hurts the defensive depth of the Pens, and the offensive depth of the Bruins.
I know what you mean. The value is pretty good and I would be tempted from a Bruins point of view but yet I am hesitant at the same time. Kessel & Lucic are so young...21 & 20 years of age and it is hard to part with that considering how they have done so far.

Stall & Whitney are no slouches and would fill some holes.

If Pitts is looking for forward depth then they should look at other players in our system.

Letang would be interesting as well. Is he on the table?

Kosikarzzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:00 AM
  #29
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claude Julien View Post
I'd drive Lucic to the airport if he was traded for Gonchar or Kaberle, but not Whitney.
I don't think that Lucic has quite proven himself enough to be worth a Franchise Dman....

I don't know why you would scoff at Whitney, if you factor in he was playing on a screwed up foot and still put up 40 points and played great defensively in the playoffs it makes him all the more impressive.

Only reason he is brought up is that I feel he would be the most appealing of the 3 puck moving Dmen Pittsburgh can realistically trade. Letang hasnt proven he can carry the load Offensively, and Goligoski is a rookie, although he has looked damn good, but I think his value is higher with Pittsburgh than it is with the rest of the league.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:03 AM
  #30
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letang58 View Post
Pretty fair value wise, but I don't know think the Pens want to give up Whitney.

How about Staal and a 2nd?

But then the Bruins probably wouldn't do it.

It hurts the defensive depth of the Pens, and the offensive depth of the Bruins.
You'd have to add in Whitney or a good puck moving Dmen otherwise Boston would have no reason to do this whatsoever. These types of things are trade offs, we are trading from an area we have a surplus that happens to be the other teams need. Yeah our depth would be hurt for a couple months but when Gonchar returns it won't matter. I think Goligoski can perform Whitney's role on the other point.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:06 AM
  #31
8BostonRocker24
Registered User
 
8BostonRocker24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Gatos via Boston
Country: China
Posts: 8,865
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
The reason I like this trade is for the following....
Glad to hear you like it. If I was Pitts I would like it too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
I do not know what his value would be to Boston.
Almost zero. I am a huge Staal fan, but he would be the 4th line center on this team. IMO, he's behind Boston's big three. He doesn't have the offensive game that Savard, Krejci, or Bergeron has, so he's not playing 1st or 2nd line center, and while Staal's defensive game is very nice, it's not as good as Bergeron's, so he wouldn't even be the 3rd line center.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
You have to admit though, the value from the Pittsburgh side is there, these guys arent exactly schlubs we are proposing.
Value wise, it might even be fair! But Boston is one of, if not the deepest team in the NHL/AHL at center. Kessel is a center and we converted him to wing.

8BostonRocker24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:07 AM
  #32
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosikarzzz View Post
I know what you mean. The value is pretty good and I would be tempted from a Bruins point of view but yet I am hesitant at the same time. Kessel & Lucic are so young...21 & 20 years of age and it is hard to part with that considering how they have done so far.

Stall & Whitney are no slouches and would fill some holes.

If Pitts is looking for forward depth then they should look at other players in our system.

Letang would be interesting as well. Is he on the table?
See these players in your system were picked out because they fit the certain need that Pittsburgh is looking to fill.

I am sure Letang would be considered, but honestly if you're looking for a more reliable puck mover Whitney would be better.. and has shown he can work a PP unit, whereas Letang is logging big minutes now but is usually playing on the PP2 unit while the Rookie Goligoski is on the PP1

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:09 AM
  #33
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8BostonRocker24 View Post
Glad to hear you like it. If I was Pitts I would like it too.

Almost zero. I am a huge Staal fan, but he would be the 4th line center on this team. IMO, he's behind Boston's big three. He doesn't have the offensive game that Savard, Krejci, or Bergeron has, so he's not playing 1st or 2nd line center, and while Staal's defensive game is very nice, it's not as good as Bergeron's, so he wouldn't even be the 3rd line center.

Value wise, it might even be fair! But Boston is one of, if not the deepest team in the NHL/AHL at center. Kessel is a center and we converted him to wing.
Fine then. Since Staal was our biggest trade piece, what would be in your mind a fair trade that would send Kessel and Lucic to the Penguins... Keep in mind to not include Crosby, Malkin, Fleury in your proposal and also realize that Gonchar has a NTC.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:12 AM
  #34
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
Fine then. Since Staal was our biggest trade piece, what would be in your mind a fair trade that would send Kessel and Lucic to the Penguins... Keep in mind to not include Crosby, Malkin, Fleury in your proposal and also realize that Gonchar has a NTC.
Nothing. A trade would not work between these two teams.

Vic Rattlehead* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:15 AM
  #35
CDJ
Registered User
 
CDJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cape Cod
Country: United States
Posts: 4,806
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claude Julien View Post
I'd drive Lucic to the airport if he was traded for Gonchar or Kaberle, but not Whitney.
For Gonchar?!

Really?

CDJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:16 AM
  #36
mytor4*
 
mytor4*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,175
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
Nothing. A trade would not work between these two teams.
Since Crosby, Malkin, Fleury and Gonchar can not be included i agree.

mytor4* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:16 AM
  #37
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
Nothing. A trade would not work between these two teams.
So what on earth would they move if they want a solid puck moving defenseman? You have to give something of value to get something of value.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:20 AM
  #38
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by trapper View Post
Since Crosby, Malkin, Fleury and Gonchar can not be included i agree.
I was stopping people from making stupid responses where they would put up a 100+ point young player in return for guys who are 20+ point players. Boston needs puck movers and thats something Pittsburgh has a lot of and they are avaliable for trade. These guys arent exactly superstars we're asking for here, stop treating them like they are.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:21 AM
  #39
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
So what on earth would they move if they want a solid puck moving defenseman? You have to give something of value to get something of value.
As far as I know, it was a Pens fan who posted this proposal.

The fact is, I wouldn't want Kessel traded for Whitney - it hurts the Bruins more than the Pens.

If the B's had to trade Kessel/Lucic, I'd rather them target a defenseman like Burns or Weber - which would cost an arm, a leg, and more.

Vic Rattlehead* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:22 AM
  #40
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
I was stopping people from making stupid responses where they would put up a 100+ point young player in return for guys who are 20+ point players. Boston needs puck movers and thats something Pittsburgh has a lot of and they are avaliable for trade. These guys arent exactly superstars we're asking for here, stop treating them like they are.
Jeez, who cares, it's the Trade board. You are taking this way too seriously.

Personally, I'd rather the B's trade for Letang, but I doubt they give him up.

Vic Rattlehead* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:24 AM
  #41
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by trapper View Post
Since Crosby, Malkin, Fleury and Gonchar can not be included i agree.
Not my point, but thanks for playing.

Vic Rattlehead* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:27 AM
  #42
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
As far as I know, it was a Pens fan who posted this proposal.

The fact is, I wouldn't want Kessel traded for Whitney - it hurts the Bruins more than the Pens.

If the B's had to trade Kessel/Lucic, I'd rather them target a defenseman like Burns or Weber - which would cost an arm, a leg, and more.
I think you're overrating those guys quite a bit to think they would land Burns or Weber... Kessel has a promising start to this season but its a gamble as to whether he can maintain it or not. His performance in seasons prior wasnt really impressive at all. Lucic is a unique kind of player but not a young superstar.

Whitney had a 59 point season before his foot got all messed up last year and he still managed to put out a 40 point season. The guy is no slouch when it comes to the puckmoving department. He is signed long term to a bargain contract, especially by today's standards... The contract ups his value as well. His value probably is a little low until he returns back from surgery but I would imagine that when he gets back and he performs strongly his value will skyrocket. That is the gamble you would take with him.

I don't understand why people were so eager to offer up Kessel for an impending UFA Gaborik who probably will go wherever the cash is the greatest and then scoff at the idea of getting two very good low 1st round players who would be around for a hell of a lot longer than just 1 season.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:31 AM
  #43
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
Jeez, who cares, it's the Trade board. You are taking this way too seriously.

Personally, I'd rather the B's trade for Letang, but I doubt they give him up.
The way Letang has been playing I would be more eager to see him be the one included instead of Whitney.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:33 AM
  #44
Crosberry87
Registered User
 
Crosberry87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,683
vCash: 500
Another center-converted-winger is the last thing the Penguins need anyway. If Staal is traded its going to be for a natural winger, else were right back in the same spot, only the new center-converted-winger is not a penalty killer. And then we throw in a top 5 point producing defenseman and only get back Lucic???

Crosberry87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:38 AM
  #45
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
I think you're overrating those guys quite a bit to think they would land Burns or Weber... Kessel has a promising start to this season but its a gamble as to whether he can maintain it or not. His performance in seasons prior wasnt really impressive at all. Lucic is a unique kind of player but not a young superstar.

Whitney had a 59 point season before his foot got all messed up last year and he still managed to put out a 40 point season. The guy is no slouch when it comes to the puckmoving department. He is signed long term to a bargain contract, especially by today's standards... The contract ups his value as well. His value probably is a little low until he returns back from surgery but I would imagine that when he gets back and he performs strongly his value will skyrocket. That is the gamble you would take with him.

I don't understand why people were so eager to offer up Kessel for an impending UFA Gaborik who probably will go wherever the cash is the greatest and then scoff at the idea of getting two very good low 1st round players who would be around for a hell of a lot longer than just 1 season.
You're not reading my posts properly....

I said it would cost an arm, a leg, and much more. Obviously that means more than Lucic and Kessel. ****

No one is eager to offer Kessel for Gaborik, that's news to me. YOU
are just making stuff up now. Bruins fans didn't even want to give him up for Hossa last season.

Vic Rattlehead* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:39 AM
  #46
Vic Rattlehead*
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: St-Hubert, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,643
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrakaLangKovy View Post
Another center-converted-winger is the last thing the Penguins need anyway. If Staal is traded its going to be for a natural winger, else were right back in the same spot, only the new center-converted-winger is not a penalty killer. And then we throw in a top 5 point producing defenseman and only get back Lucic???
Kessel has been playing like a natural winger for a long time now. He's been more effective as a winger than a center in the NHL, and it's showing this season.

Vic Rattlehead* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:41 AM
  #47
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
You're not reading my posts...why can't you read?

I said it would cost an arm, a leg, and much more. Obviously that means more than Lucic and Kessel. ****

No one is eager to offer Kessel for Gaborik, that's news to me. YOU
are just making stuff up now. Bruins fans didn't even want to give him up for Hossa last season.
I saw it proposed in the numerous Gaborik threads, thought it looked silly so that is why it caught my attention.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:43 AM
  #48
Gooch
Registered User
 
Gooch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Seymour, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,086
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrakaLangKovy View Post
Another center-converted-winger is the last thing the Penguins need anyway. If Staal is traded its going to be for a natural winger, else were right back in the same spot, only the new center-converted-winger is not a penalty killer. And then we throw in a top 5 point producing defenseman and only get back Lucic???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
Kessel has been playing like a natural winger for a long time now. He's been more effective as a winger than a center in the NHL, and it's showing this season.
There have been a lot of NHL players who play as wing now but were drafted as a Center. It isnt uncommon for them to make the transition properly, just because people think Staal is having difficulty with it doesnt mean other players will as well.

Kessel is looking good at wing right now and for his assets I think the wing position supports his playstyle more than Center does. To me he seems like the ideal speedy winger for Crosby.

Gooch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 11:44 AM
  #49
Crosberry87
Registered User
 
Crosberry87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,683
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Rattlehead View Post
Kessel has been playing like a natural winger for a long time now. He's been more effective as a winger than a center in the NHL, and it's showing this season.

Crosberry87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-19-2008, 12:16 PM
  #50
louieleftwing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 346
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooch View Post
LOL I thought this looked familiar, this is pretty much what I proposed on the pens board, you thief!!!
Haha, I actually tried to post on that very thread that a deal like this is in the neighborhood of what I had been thinking about (Whitney + Staal for 2 young wingers) and that I was gonna post it on the main board to see what the response was like, but my post didn't stick I guess.

Good to see so many replies. Of course I don't frame it this way at the time of proposal, but obviously the B's center-depth is prolly the sticking point in a deal like this. Similar to the Pens in that regard. Response is pretty much what I expected.

Besides, this is how GMs get to the trades that really go down...In this case Letang for Lucic

louieleftwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.