But I think it is only allowed because it was initially called a goal (on the ice). I think if the ref initially said "no goal", the video review would stand because there wasn't any conclusive evidence.
When a goal is under review, I don't think that what the ref called matters
Oh you know it. Assuming the Wings hadn't made an offer, I'm sure he would have down the megamillion, multiyear contract from the Oilers to sign with the always-promising Panthers.
This man has to be among the most underrated forwards in the league. He led the Thrashers to the playoffs for crying out loud. He was a thirty goal scorer in Ottawa--playing with Havlat and Bonk/Varada.
Don't support putting T-Vo in that quick. If you're going call him the starter, give him more than 2 goals.
Perhaps DeBoer is getting on his players with that move? Such as Bouw, for getting caught?
Yes, Bouw pinching in was pretty bad. But I do believe Andy should have had that goal. When whoever it was, (think it was holmstrom) skating the puck into the offensive zone, you could see Bouw behind gliding in, not even hustling to get back to his spot. Was pretty brutal.