HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Mike Gillis Transaction History

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-20-2009, 05:45 PM
  #126
19nazzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,189
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanucksOo View Post
Thanks.

__________________
- Sent from my desktop using my fingers
19nazzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-22-2009, 04:28 AM
  #127
Tripwyre
Registered User
 
Tripwyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,076
vCash: 500
Minor error in the OP: Conditions weren't met on the 7th round pick in the Chicago trade, and we didn't get anything. Our 7th pick (Anthony) was acquired during the draft in a trade that sent Shaun Heshka to Phoenix.

Tripwyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-22-2009, 10:38 AM
  #128
pitseleh
Registered User
 
pitseleh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,644
vCash: 500
Didn't notice it in the OP but the Canucks also hired Glenn Carnegie as a skill coach.

http://canucks.nhl.com/club/page.htm?id=39884
http://www.dynamicgoaltending.com/

pitseleh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-22-2009, 04:53 PM
  #129
19nazzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,189
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pitseleh View Post
Didn't notice it in the OP but the Canucks also hired Glenn Carnegie as a skill coach.

http://canucks.nhl.com/club/page.htm?id=39884
http://www.dynamicgoaltending.com/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripwyre View Post
Minor error in the OP: Conditions weren't met on the 7th round pick in the Chicago trade, and we didn't get anything. Our 7th pick (Anthony) was acquired during the draft in a trade that sent Shaun Heshka to Phoenix.
Thanks for those.

19nazzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-29-2009, 08:02 PM
  #130
jumptheshark
the burn out
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country: United Nations
Posts: 52,870
vCash: 1000
I guess Schneider on waivers qualifies

__________________
not sure how--but the fish just jumped in the boat and put the hook in it's mouth
52299/14814
The twenty year rebuild is on!!! Embrace the suck
jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-29-2009, 08:20 PM
  #131
19nazzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,189
vCash: 500
I've only been putting guys on there who get claimed off waivers. Otherwise there would be way too many call-ups/downs.

19nazzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-10-2010, 06:33 PM
  #132
Canuckee
Registered User
 
Canuckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,311
vCash: 500
So far this summer his major movies have been to get rollie the goalie as a fulltime goaltending coach for luongo, the ballard trade, acquisition of hamhuis, malhotra, tambelini, perault, and the resigning of glass and obrian, and rome

Canuckee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2010, 03:17 AM
  #133
Canuckee
Registered User
 
Canuckee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,311
vCash: 500
well it hasnt been used in 7 months until now

Canuckee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2010, 05:14 AM
  #134
El Duderino
Registered User
 
El Duderino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,745
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuckee View Post
well it hasnt been used in 7 months until now
The first post has been updated on a consistent basis

El Duderino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2010, 11:32 PM
  #135
David Booth Fan
Registered User
 
David Booth Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,658
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to David Booth Fan
http://twitter.com/sportsnetmurph
Torres 1 year 1 mil

David Booth Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
10-06-2010, 01:08 PM
  #136
Cogburn
Registered User
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,743
vCash: 50
So after clearing waivers, O'Brien and Hordichuk are traded:

Oct 5th O'Brien and Gendur for Andersson and Parent, the latter of whom is immediately waived and clears.

Oct 6th Hordichuk for Peters.

http://tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=336401

and

http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?p...9#post28133139

Busy few mornings.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2011, 02:53 AM
  #137
Vancouver_2010
Go Canucks & Oilers
 
Vancouver_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
aren't you going to update our deadline deal?

Vancouver_2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2011, 11:33 AM
  #138
19nazzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,189
vCash: 500
I'm pretty sure it's already there. Did I miss something?

19nazzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2011, 07:53 PM
  #139
AmazingNuck
Registered User
 
AmazingNuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,130
vCash: 500
Is Schneider an RFA at the end of his contract? Capgeek says he is an RFA but tsn:

http://i.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=359894

says he is not.

AmazingNuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-28-2011, 08:32 PM
  #140
Ernie
Registered User
 
Ernie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,048
vCash: 500
He will be 26 when his contract expires next summer, so yes, still an RFA.

Ernie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-29-2011, 12:15 AM
  #141
Wetcoaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 54,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleetFoxes View Post
Is Schneider an RFA at the end of his contract? Capgeek says he is an RFA but tsn:

http://i.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=359894

says he is not.
It is a little complicated - he could conceivably have been either RFA or UFA but UFA now appears highly unlikely.

Prior to signing his two year deal Schneider was on track for Group 6 UFA status after the 2010-11 season if he did not play sufficient games AND if he had signed a one year deal.

If Schneider would not have played sufficient NHL games (28) by the time he is 25 (end of the 2010-11 season assuming he had not signed the two year contract extension) then he would have been be a Group 6 free agent. He must actually play at least 30 minutes for a game to count for these purposes. Sitting on the bench as a back up does not count. Before this season he had played 10 games but only 7 of them will count as he played less than 30 minutes in 3 of his credited games.
Group 6 Free Agents.

(i) Means any Player who is age 25 or older who has completed three (3) or more professional seasons, whose SPC has expired and: (i) in the case of a Player other than a goaltender, has played less than 80 NHL Games, or (ii) in the case of a goaltender, has played less than 28 NHL Games (for the purpose of this definition, a goaltender must have played a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in an NHL Game to register a game played).
So without the two year contract extension he would have had to play a minimum of 21 NHL games where he logs at least 30 minutes in each of those 21 games if he had signed a one year deal or he would have been UFA.

It looks like he is going to get at least one more start this season so that would be his 21st game with 30 or more minutes (he has credit for 22 games now but he had less than 30 minutes in 2 of those games) and that would end his possible UFA status after the 2011-12 season.

As he will not yet be 27 at the end of next season when his 2 year deal ends, he would be RFA under the current CBA (but it may depend upon what occurs with any new CBA).

Clear as mud, eh?

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2011, 02:22 AM
  #142
AmazingNuck
Registered User
 
AmazingNuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,130
vCash: 500
Helpful as always. If I am interpreting it correctly that is some shrew micromanagement by Gillis. Now I'll be at the edge of my seat hoping for Schneider to make another start this season.

AmazingNuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-30-2011, 03:04 AM
  #143
Ernie
Registered User
 
Ernie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,048
vCash: 500
uh, no, all he would have needed is 28 games when his contract expires. Which is a year from now.

Ernie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 02:39 PM
  #144
19nazzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,189
vCash: 500
Oops, nvm.


Last edited by 19nazzy: 07-01-2011 at 02:40 PM. Reason: Meant to edit, not post
19nazzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 08:52 PM
  #145
SiCKNESS
Registered User
 
SiCKNESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,348
vCash: 500
GMMG has made some bad moves imo.
Ballard Deal, Malhotra is slightly over paid(Worth 1.75-2.25), Sturm is not even close to worth 2.25M, Too big a term for Luongo, Even if he got 2-3 years less it'd be fine....

Everyone thinks he's the best GM, but he isnt THAT great, he's made some bad moves and some good moves..

SiCKNESS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 09:08 PM
  #146
The Big Foot
Registered User
 
The Big Foot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Bhutan
Posts: 2,596
vCash: 500
At this point he has shown a pretty unique characteristic:

His deadline deals have all stuck around for multiple years (as far as I can remember). Alberts was on a two year deal and reupped for two more, Higgins resigned, Lapierre resigned...and all on very team friendly deals. Good to see he has a plan in a sketchy time.

The Big Foot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 09:33 PM
  #147
Connecticut
Registered User
 
Connecticut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,773
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiCKNESS View Post
GMMG has made some bad moves imo.
Ballard Deal, Malhotra is slightly over paid(Worth 1.75-2.25), Sturm is not even close to worth 2.25M, Too big a term for Luongo, Even if he got 2-3 years less it'd be fine....

Everyone thinks he's the best GM, but he isnt THAT great, he's made some bad moves and some good moves..
I don't think all Gillis' moves have turned out great, but I appreciate having a GM that has a plan and tries to execute it. I'm very curious to see whether we'll have a legit top-6 winger on the roster by training camp. On the whole Gillis has done a fantastic job with the organization, and I think he has a long term plan that will see us continue to improve. Fans have every right to second guess his moves, but I think more often than not it turns out he's a lot smarter than they are.

I don't buy for a second that Malhotra's not worth 2.5M -- you'd have to be blind not to see the effect he's had on the team in the dressing room and what he's enabled the team to do on the ice. The bottom line is that if you're only willing to give Malhotra 1.75-2.25M, he's playing for another team. Take a look at the UFAs around the league that have signed in the past two years and try to find 3 that are a better all around value than Malhotra at 2.5M. Just because people don't "think" he's worth 2.5M doesn't mean that he's not. He absolutely is. Gillis may have misfired here and there, but Malhotra is a terrible example.

Connecticut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 09:49 PM
  #148
Agent007
Registered User
 
Agent007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,584
vCash: 500
I remember reading somewhere that Gillis absolutely HATES giving up assets for a player that is strictly a rental player.

Agent007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 11:47 PM
  #149
Bubbles
Tank for Tyler2016
 
Bubbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BC Teams:Nucks,Juve
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,370
vCash: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiCKNESS View Post
GMMG has made some bad moves imo.
Ballard Deal, Malhotra is slightly over paid(Worth 1.75-2.25), Sturm is not even close to worth 2.25M, Too big a term for Luongo, Even if he got 2-3 years less it'd be fine....

Everyone thinks he's the best GM, but he isnt THAT great, he's made some bad moves and some good moves..
Some of Gillis' best moves is NOT making moves. Example, this season he seems a bit quiet so far, and considering the absolutely stupid contracts being thrown around this year, that's a smart thing.

We don't need major reinforcements, unlike last year.

Bubbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-02-2011, 12:07 AM
  #150
19nazzy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 17,189
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiCKNESS View Post
GMMG has made some bad moves imo.
Ballard Deal, Malhotra is slightly over paid(Worth 1.75-2.25), Sturm is not even close to worth 2.25M, Too big a term for Luongo, Even if he got 2-3 years less it'd be fine....

Everyone thinks he's the best GM, but he isnt THAT great, he's made some bad moves and some good moves..
He's definitely made some bad moves, which all GMs do. However what I really like about him is that he has done a much better job filling in the depth spots in the lineup, especially when compared to Nonis and Burke.

19nazzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.