HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Notices

Rank the D

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
12-05-2008, 05:31 PM
  #1
XS Chop
Registered User
 
XS Chop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maple Shade, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 500
vCash: 500
Rank the D

Lots of talk, and rightfully so, about our defense. Lets put it into perspective a bit though. Lets see, 1-8, where we stand come playoff time. Which of these defense's would you like to go into the postseason with. Once we have that down we can talk about how much we need to improve to give us a good chance in April. Try to be objective and rank the players as a whole, not just the stars or systems.

Boston:
Zdeno Chara
Dennis Wideman
Matt Hunwick
Aaron Ward
Shane Hnidy
Mark Stuart
Andrew Ference

Carolina:
Joni Pitkanen
Joe Corvo
Niclas Wallin
Frantisek Kaberle
Josef Melichar
Anton Babchuk
David Tanabe
Dennis Seidenberg
Tim Gleason

Washington:
Milan Jurcina
Karl Alzner
Tom Poti
Sami Lepisto
Shaone Morrisonn
Tyler Sloan
Jeff Schultz
Brian Pothier
Mike Green
John Erskin

Pittsburgh:
Sergei Gonchar
Brooks Orpik
Kris Letang
Rob Scuderi
Hal Gill
Alex Goligoski
Mark Eaton
Philippe Boucher
Ryan Whitney

Rangers:
Marc Staal
Daniel Girardi
Michal Rozsival
Wade Redden
Paul Mara
Dmitri Kalinin

NJ:
Paul Martin
Bryce Salvador
Johnny Oduya
Colin White
Mike Mottau
Jat Leach
Sheldon Brookbank

Montreal:
Roman Hamrlik
Josh Gorges
Andrei Markov
Ryan O'Byrne
Francis Bouillon
Patrice Brisebois
Mike Komisarek

Philly:
Kimmo Timonen
Braydon Coburn
Matt Carle
Ossi Vaananen
Randy Jones
Ryan Parent
Luca Sbisa
Andrew Alberts
Lasse Kukkonen

Apologies for the lenth but we need to remember that we're not the only team with guys that may hurt us defensively.

XS Chop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-05-2008, 05:43 PM
  #2
Gags1288
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,327
vCash: 500
My defense rankings would be something like this:

1. Rangers
2. Montreal
3. Boston
4. Philadelphia
5. Pittsburgh
6. Washington
7. Carolina
8. New Jersey

1-3 is very close
4-5 is also very close
6-8 are all very poor groups of d-men

The more glaring concern is the goaltending:

1. Brodeur
2. Lundqvist
3. Fleury
4. Price
5. Thomas
6. Ward
7. Theodore
8. Biron

Gags1288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-05-2008, 05:45 PM
  #3
Cleary84
G for the C
 
Cleary84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags1288 View Post
My defense rankings would be something like this:

1. Rangers
2. Montreal
3. Boston
4. Philadelphia
5. Pittsburgh
6. Washington
7. Carolina
8. New Jersey

1-3 is very close
4-5 is also very close
6-8 are all very poor groups of d-men

The more glaring concern is the goaltending:

1. Brodeur
2. Lundqvist
3. Fleury
4. Price
5. Thomas
6. Ward
7. Theodore
8. Biron
I second that. The goalies are the real deal in this conference.

Cleary84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-05-2008, 05:54 PM
  #4
XS Chop
Registered User
 
XS Chop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maple Shade, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 500
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyers84 View Post
I second that. The goalies are the real deal in this conference.
Agreed, but where do you find, not just an upgrade, a really substantial upgrade over Biron? Those few guy's don't come cheap and for the most part aren't available at all no matter what the price.

Not so sure I put Biron #8 on that list either.

XS Chop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-05-2008, 07:40 PM
  #5
decadentia
Registered User
 
decadentia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Brunswick
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,520
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gags1288 View Post

The more glaring concern is the goaltending:

1. Brodeur
2. Lundqvist
3. Thomas
4. Price
5. Fleury

6. Ward
7. Biron
8. Theodore
Performance wise Thomas is ahead of Fleury this year, Thomas has been that good. He also might arguably be ahead of Lundqvist so far this year. That's if we're talking this years results, longterm/potential is a completely different can of worms. 6-8 are totally interchangeable, depending on the time of year. Though i'd put Biron ahead of Theodore, based on performance thus far.

decadentia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-05-2008, 08:35 PM
  #6
Gags1288
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,327
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by decadentia View Post
Performance wise Thomas is ahead of Fleury this year, Thomas has been that good. He also might arguably be ahead of Lundqvist so far this year. That's if we're talking this years results, longterm/potential is a completely different can of worms. 6-8 are totally interchangeable, depending on the time of year. Though i'd put Biron ahead of Theodore, based on performance thus far.
I wasn't really ranking the goalies based on this year, but more on who I'd want and who I think gives there team the best chance to win this year. I agree that Thomas could be higher. Even though his style is sometimes hard to watch, his results have been quite good.

Gags1288 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-05-2008, 10:02 PM
  #7
mm6492
Registered User
 
mm6492's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,505
vCash: 500
We need to DRAFT a goalie this year. We need someone who will eventually be a ggood goalie for us...

mm6492 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 01:35 AM
  #8
dbr2
Lockout Beard
 
dbr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 9,327
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to dbr2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm6492 View Post
We need to DRAFT a goalie this year. We need someone who will eventually be a ggood goalie for us...
Agreed. What i'd like to see us do is draft a goalie prospect, stick him in the backup slot weather or not Nitty is here next year.

dbr2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 01:53 AM
  #9
chaosof99*
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austria
Country: Austria
Posts: 16,614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm6492 View Post
We need to DRAFT a goalie this year. We need someone who will eventually be a ggood goalie for us...
I've been saying this since August.

chaosof99* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 07:21 AM
  #10
DeadPhish5858
Rumham!
 
DeadPhish5858's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manayunk
Country: United States
Posts: 13,458
vCash: 1550
Send a message via AIM to DeadPhish5858
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaosof99 View Post
I've been saying this since August.
We all have.

Why don't Flyers management read this forum?

DeadPhish5858 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 10:06 AM
  #11
ORYX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,429
vCash: 255
We've all been saying it since August, however there is only one prospect draft per year so we have to wait until then anyways so whats the big deal now?

It isnt something we can change through the course of the year, so why continue to bring it up and drag it through the mud? We all know the organization needs a strong goaltending prospect, and if the team managers dont know then i'd suggest we all apply for the soon to be vancant positions.

We need a goalie prospect, yup heard yea the first time back in august, its now december, the season is well underway and we still have to wait for a draft, nothing has changed.

ORYX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 11:39 AM
  #12
XS Chop
Registered User
 
XS Chop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maple Shade, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 500
vCash: 500
Understood about the goaltender situation but what I'm getting at is this.

1. Our scoring can pretty much run with anyone in the league right now.
2. We, like most teams, just have to hope our goalie gets hot at the right times. Probably will be Biron, maybe not, either way there will be no huge improvement there for the playoffs this year.
3. Our D, as much as we complain (myself included), is not that bad. In fact, we may be one move away from joining the elite D's in the East.

I know I'm not breaking any new ground here but it seems obvious that the easiest step towards another great playoff run is one more significant move for a Dman. My question is, looking at what the other teams have, how big of a move do you think that needs to be? Do you think it's just a matter of upgrading a 3rd pairing weak spot or do we need a big J-Bo style jump to get with the Rangers/Habs/Bruins?

XS Chop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 01:19 PM
  #13
mm6492
Registered User
 
mm6492's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,505
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ORYX View Post
We've all been saying it since August, however there is only one prospect draft per year so we have to wait until then anyways so whats the big deal now?

It isnt something we can change through the course of the year, so why continue to bring it up and drag it through the mud? We all know the organization needs a strong goaltending prospect, and if the team managers dont know then i'd suggest we all apply for the soon to be vancant positions.

We need a goalie prospect, yup heard yea the first time back in august, its now december, the season is well underway and we still have to wait for a draft, nothing has changed.
The fact is that we traded a 1st for Steve Eminger, who is already gone, when there were a few goalie prospects available and we all knew it was a need. Goalies take longer to devlop, we needed to draft one LAST year to be ready a year or 2 from now.

Jacob Markstrom was drafted 31st by the Panthers. From what I have heard, he has been phenominal this year.

I understand why we traded for Eminger but was it worth it?? I liek Carle but could we have gotten him w/o giving up Eminger??

I just feel that the management has falied in the goalie department. It is one position in the NHl where it is hard to upgrade through FA and trade. You can get players like Biron, Huet, Theodore... But you can not get a Lundquist, Fleury, Brodeur, Luongo

That is why, if it ever comes up, we need to pursue an elite goalie if he becomes avialbe. If Luongo becomes a FA, you have to find room to sign him, through trading slaray and such. If a team is willing to trade an elite goalie, you have to go after him even if you have to overpay

Ane elite goalie can do something that no one else can. An elite goalie can carry you to a championship. A great offensive or defensive player can help, but a goalie can do it by himself almost. I understand that there have been teams lately we have seen goalies get hot or playing behind a great defense, and win a cup.

However, the Flyers orginization has failed over the years to aquire a true #1 goalie, going back to Hextall. We have seen Nitty, Biron, Esche, Chechmakek(sp) and Boucher. Many of them have had good epriod here and maybe even a good season or two. But none of them have been that true so called "#1" goalie. A guy who will steal you a few wins that another goalie would not have gotten you.

Bobby Clarke and Ed Snider paid for top offenive players. They even aquired a few defensive players. But they never aquired the goalie. Hopefully Homer is different. Hopefully he can get us that goalie that we have all been waiting for.

I understand that Homer aquired Biron and he ahs been pretty good. However he is hot and cold. i understand most goalie are, but no that bad. He has trouble in rebound control and other things.

Hopefully the Flyers will try to aquire a true "#1" goalie in the next couple of years, either through the draft, FA or trade.

mm6492 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 04:56 PM
  #14
wahoowa
All in the Game
 
wahoowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 930
vCash: 500
Yeah, it's too bad we missed out on Pickard this year.

wahoowa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 08:49 PM
  #15
Bodrovs Dog
 
Bodrovs Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Delaware
Posts: 67
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoowa View Post
Yeah, it's too bad we missed out on Pickard this year.
No it isn't. Missing out on Pickard and ending up with Sbisa was the best thing that could have happened to us.

Goalies are impossible to gauge; tons of 1st round goalies end up as busts, and plenty of good goalies were selected in the mid to late rounds.

Bodrovs Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 09:55 PM
  #16
bney7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodrovs Dog View Post
No it isn't. Missing out on Pickard and ending up with Sbisa was the best thing that could have happened to us.

Goalies are impossible to gauge; tons of 1st round goalies end up as busts, and plenty of good goalies were selected in the mid to late rounds.
Yup, that's why I don't mind them not dumping a 1st round pick into them.

Last 15 years our 3 1st round goaltenders we taken haven't turned out too great. . . .

95 - Boucher
97 - Pelletier
99 - Oulette
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's where the starters around the league were drafted.

Lundqvist - 7th Round
Nabokov - 9th Round
Giguere - 1st Round
Kiprusoft - 5th Round
Backstrom - Undrafted
Price - 1st Round
Osgood - 3rd Round
Luongo - 1st Round
Miller - 5th Round
Brodeur 1st Round
Thomas - 9th Round
Auld - 2nd Round
Toskala - 4th Round
Fleury - 1st Round
Turco - 5th Round
Theodore - 2nd Round
Bryzgalov - 2nd Round
Ward - 1st Round
Smith - 5th Round
Mason - 3rd Round
Budaj - 2nd Round

It really is a crap shoot.

bney7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-06-2008, 09:59 PM
  #17
Brophy
Registered User
 
Brophy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Redondo Beach
Country: United States
Posts: 553
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bney7 View Post
Yup, that's why I don't mind them not dumping a 1st round pick into them.

Last 15 years our 3 1st round goaltenders we taken haven't turned out too great. . . .

95 - Boucher
97 - Pelletier
99 - Oulette
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's where the starters around the league were drafted.

Lundqvist - 7th Round
Nabokov - 9th Round
Giguere - 1st Round
Kiprusoft - 5th Round
Backstrom - Undrafted
Price - 1st Round
Osgood - 3rd Round
Luongo - 1st Round
Miller - 5th Round
Brodeur 1st Round
Thomas - 9th Round
Auld - 2nd Round
Toskala - 4th Round
Fleury - 1st Round
Turco - 5th Round
Theodore - 2nd Round
Bryzgalov - 2nd Round
Ward - 1st Round
Smith - 5th Round
Mason - 3rd Round
Budaj - 2nd Round

It really is a crap shoot.
Jesus christ. I knew some were drafted late, but I had no idea some were that late.

Brophy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-07-2008, 07:22 AM
  #18
XS Chop
Registered User
 
XS Chop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maple Shade, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 500
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brophy View Post
Jesus christ. I knew some were drafted late, but I had no idea some were that late.
Yeah, here's a list of goalies picked before Lundqvist:
1 1 Rick DiPietro
1 9 Brent Krahn
2 44 Ilya Bryzgalov
2 45 Matheu Chouinard
2 60 Dan Ellis
3 70 Mikael Tellqvist
3 84 Peter Hamerlik
3 90 Jean-Francois Racine
4 102 Stefan Liv
4 111 Ghyslain Rousseau
4 116 Levente Szuper
4 120 Davis Parley
5 143 Brandon Snee
5 165 Nathan Masters
5 166 Nolan Schaefer
6 168 Zdenek Smid
6 169 Shane Bendera
6 171 Roman Cechmanek
6 177 Mike Ayers
7 203 Jure Penko
7 205 Henrik Lundqvist

Anyone in the league could have had him. Even the Rangers picked Snee 2 rounds earlier.

XS Chop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-07-2008, 08:35 AM
  #19
flyboys15
 
flyboys15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: Ireland
Posts: 1,034
vCash: 500
Maybe this is nick-pickin but ranking Jurcina as Washington's top D-man couldn't be more wrong, that guy is in the Rory Fitz realm.

flyboys15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-07-2008, 10:03 AM
  #20
rban*
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,894
vCash: 500
Montreal's defense is clearly the class of the East .. no one else comes close. I dont quite ubderstand why people cant see that.

rban* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-07-2008, 05:35 PM
  #21
flyboys15
 
flyboys15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Country: Ireland
Posts: 1,034
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rban View Post
Montreal's defense is clearly the class of the East .. no one else comes close. I dont quite ubderstand why people cant see that.
Montreal's D has given up 13 more goals that Boston, who has played the same amount of games, and 3 more than NYR, who has three in hand on MTL. That's probably why they are not considered clearly the class of the East.

flyboys15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-07-2008, 05:52 PM
  #22
rban*
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,894
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyboys15 View Post
Montreal's D has given up 13 more goals that Boston, who has played the same amount of games, and 3 more than NYR, who has three in hand on MTL. That's probably why they are not considered clearly the class of the East.
Komisarek injury!

rban* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2008, 12:41 AM
  #23
chaosof99*
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austria
Country: Austria
Posts: 16,614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rban View Post
Komisarek injury!
Psst, if one guy gets injured and your defense becomes much worse for for it, your defense is not that good.

chaosof99* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2008, 01:32 AM
  #24
blah
Registered User
 
blah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,268
vCash: 500
Don't sleep on a healthy Penguins blueline. They're missing their two best dmen at the moment.

I'll probably get flamed, but the Flyers defense is slowly coming around. They could be as big a strength as the forwards are by the end of the year. If Coburn starts playing like he did last season, as a group, they're very good. I'd like to see another dman similiar to Ossi added, but the Flyers top three pairs can be as good as any other team's in the East. They've come a really long way in 25 games. I'm glad Homer addressed it early in the season instead of waiting. And it can get better just by players getting healthy.

blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2008, 01:47 AM
  #25
FlyHigh
Registered User
 
FlyHigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,158
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to FlyHigh Send a message via MSN to FlyHigh
I'd say we're better than Boston personally. They have Chara and Wideman who are both great and will log 25 minutes, but outside of that, it's all bottom pairing guys with little to no puck skills.

Time will tell, we're still a work in progress.

FlyHigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.