HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Patrice Bergeron & picks to Anaheim for Chris Pronger

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-03-2009, 08:47 PM
  #326
caliamad
Registered User
 
caliamad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,031
vCash: 500
Its been said to death, but Boston will have to unload a big salary to re-sign Kessel and Kreijic, resign a goalie and fit rask into the payroll. The following year Lucic will be a RFA. As it is, Boston won't be able to keep everyone and its clear some people don't realize that.

Trading Bergeron would be a prudent move for them just because out of all their forwards he has the most risk (concussions). He may god's gift of a talent, but he's 1 hit away from retiring.

Having said all this I highly doubt this move happens. I don't think Anaheim trades for equal salary in a Pronger move. More likely they are asking for someone like Lucic as ownership wants to trim payroll.

Stuart, Colburne, Lucic, and 1st make a lot of sense from Duck's perspective and if they can't get that, they'll likely not make a trade.

caliamad is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 08:49 PM
  #327
DaStinger
My Precious!
 
DaStinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NB, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,857
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to DaStinger
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hedgehog Hodgson View Post
You call 10 goals prorated over a 82 game schedule a decent offensive game? Not saying that Bergeron isn't offensively talented, but quite clearly, he isn't producing offensively.
So according to you any player that doesn't put up big points is a bad player?

DaStinger is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 08:52 PM
  #328
Towelie*
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dafoomie View Post
He slumped badly early in the year. Losing Marco Sturm, and having P.J. Axelsson and Chuck Kobasew on his line has hurt his production. But, he has 6 points in his last 8 games, you're a little off base here. Bad season? Yes. Currently? Playing pretty well.
As I have stated, I am not arguing that Bergeron can't play better offensively or that he won't play better offensively, only that he hasn't played good offensively.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaStinger View Post
So according to you any player that doesn't put up big points is a bad player?
When did I say that? Quite clearly, I have maintained from the beginning that he hasn't played well offensively. Players that don't put up lots of points are not good offensively (presently), pretty simple.

Towelie* is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 08:54 PM
  #329
dafoomie
Eat Mor Chikin
 
dafoomie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston
Country: United States
Posts: 14,094
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to dafoomie
Once again, last 8 games:

Savard 8 pts
Ryder 7 pts
Bergeron 6 pts
Wheeler 5 pts
Krejci 4 pts
Kobasew 4 pts
Kessel 3 pts
Axelsson 2 pts


Right now, it doesn't matter what Bergeron was doing before. It matters what he's doing now and what he's going to do going forward. Predictably, he struggled in the first half of the season to find his game but he's played pretty well as of late.

dafoomie is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 08:55 PM
  #330
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,907
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
Quote:
Originally Posted by The SilverCup View Post
Credit goes to B0ST0N11


Boston radio is rumouring Patrice Bergeron and a few picks to Anaheim for Chris Pronger is on the table.
Didn't Mackenzie say Bergeron + Kessel on TSN 2 days ago?

thadd is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 08:57 PM
  #331
Towelie*
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dafoomie View Post
Once again, last 8 games:

Savard 8 pts
Ryder 7 pts
Bergeron 6 pts
Wheeler 5 pts
Krejci 4 pts
Kobasew 4 pts
Kessel 3 pts
Axelsson 2 pts


Right now, it doesn't matter what Bergeron was doing before. It matters what he's doing now and what he's going to do going forward. Predictably, he struggled in the first half of the season to find his game but he's played pretty well as of late.
8 games don't change a season, but I agree that this is a promising trend for Bergeron.

Towelie* is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 08:59 PM
  #332
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
I <3 Fantasy GM's.

Nikita Filatov* is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:02 PM
  #333
dafoomie
Eat Mor Chikin
 
dafoomie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston
Country: United States
Posts: 14,094
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to dafoomie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hedgehog Hodgson View Post
8 games don't change a season, but I agree that this is a promising trend for Bergeron.
Especially considering that the team as a whole is struggling offensively. Bergeron has been one of their best forwards lately and I have no reservations about him at all. He took a beating tonight and it didn't faze him.

dafoomie is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:04 PM
  #334
Towelie*
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikita Filatov View Post
I <3 Fantasy GM's.
You have made an ass of yourself in this thread. Why not try addressing arguments made instead of just mindlessly going on about how I have to watch Bruins games to draw conclusions on actual production made by Bruins players.

You really don't get it.

Towelie* is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:07 PM
  #335
bb_fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: boston
Posts: 7,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by caliamad View Post
Its been said to death, but Boston will have to unload a big salary to re-sign Kessel and Kreijic, resign a goalie and fit rask into the payroll. The following year Lucic will be a RFA. As it is, Boston won't be able to keep everyone and its clear some people don't realize that.
Trading Bergeron would be a prudent move for them just because out of all their forwards he has the most risk (concussions). He may god's gift of a talent, but he's 1 hit away from retiring.

Having said all this I highly doubt this move happens. I don't think Anaheim trades for equal salary in a Pronger move. More likely they are asking for someone like Lucic as ownership wants to trim payroll.

Stuart, Colburne, Lucic, and 1st make a lot of sense from Duck's perspective and if they can't get that, they'll likely not make a trade.
glad it does for the ducks, becuase its crap for boston to do it.

and its also pretty clear that boston wont be dishing any of there young core for money reasons.

period.

and is bergeron one hit away from retiring on the Jones hit?

or the one hit after that in the Caroline game were he suffered a concussion?

or is it now one hit after the one hit after the one hit?

bb_fan is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:08 PM
  #336
bb_fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: boston
Posts: 7,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hedgehog Hodgson View Post
8 games don't change a season, but I agree that this is a promising trend for Bergeron.
and one season doesnt make a carreer.

bb_fan is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:08 PM
  #337
hockeydemon05
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,604
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to hockeydemon05
Well then, they obviously don't want Pronger if they are unwilling to pay. Why is this thread still here?

hockeydemon05 is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:12 PM
  #338
bb_fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: boston
Posts: 7,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hedgehog Hodgson View Post
I don't really by the whole 'he is playing with scrubs so it is fine that he is putting up pathetic point totals' argument. Ask yourself, why is he playing with offensive scrubs? Its not like the Bruins are punishing him on purpose. If he was able to play well offensively with some of Boston's good offensive players, clearly he would be put there. There is a reason why he is playing with Axelsson, and that is because he hasn't played well offensively.

Furthermore, the fact that Bergeron plays on average, the second most powerplay time of Boston's forwards (excluding Sturm due to the small sample size,) at 3:06 minutes, and yet has put up an appallingly low 10 power play points. Thats 150 minutes, so about 1 point about every 15 minutes.
clearly he wouldnt, as has been shown by the fact that, well, he hasnt

he's been one of the best defensive forwards for boston this year, and with there depth up front, thats certainoy allowed him be used in that role, not the other way around.

bb_fan is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:13 PM
  #339
bb_fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: boston
Posts: 7,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeydemon05 View Post
Well then, they obviously don't want Pronger if they are unwilling to pay. Why is this thread still here?
why becuase they arent willing to pay what HF boards think they should?

bb_fan is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:15 PM
  #340
HabsoluteFate
Registered User
 
HabsoluteFate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,870
vCash: 500
if Patrice can stay healthy Anaheim wins this one...

if

HabsoluteFate is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:25 PM
  #341
MoreOrr
B4
 
MoreOrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mexico
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,225
vCash: 500
NO, say it isn't so!!

And besides, since when do the Bruins need to strengthen up their Defense. The Offense is what has been ocassionally suspect.


Last edited by MoreOrr: 03-03-2009 at 09:53 PM.
MoreOrr is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:38 PM
  #342
hockeydemon05
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,604
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to hockeydemon05
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb_fan View Post
why becuase they arent willing to pay what HF boards think they should?
Well, at least be realistic. No young "core" players...OK

hockeydemon05 is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:54 PM
  #343
Lost Horizons
Bluesman
 
Lost Horizons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Delta
Country: United States
Posts: 7,071
vCash: 500
Hold on rewind here: "Boston Radio" is reporting this? and what station would be this"Boston radio" be because i don't see any station mentioned anywhere and even though the B's are doing well no Boston radio station talks B's hockey.

Lost Horizons is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:56 PM
  #344
clumping platelets
Registered User
 
clumping platelets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Clumptowaga
Country: United States
Posts: 1,487
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Towers View Post

clumping platelets is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 09:56 PM
  #345
Nikita Filatov*
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Nikita Filatov*
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeydemon05 View Post
Well, at least be realistic. No young "core" players...OK
Well... If Bergeron isn't considered a core player I don't know what is.

Nikita Filatov* is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 10:18 PM
  #346
Ducks
Registered User
 
Ducks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Riverside, Calif.
Country: United States
Posts: 1,824
vCash: 500
I posted it earlier and I'll post it again, I think this is the fairest deal for both teams:

ANA: Pronger + Pahlsson

for

BOS: Bergeron, Stuart, Colborne, Lashoff, 1st 09 or 10

If Boston wants to win the cup THIS YEAR, then they do this if it's offered imo. Boston gets an elite defensemen in Pronger and an elite shutdown forward in Pahlsson for their run at the cup. This trade would make Boston clear favorites in the east this year. Plus, they are stacked with young talent. Pronger isn't a rental, you don't offer a bag of pucks and think that you'll get him.

This is a trade Boston makes if it's offered and they think they can win it all this year.

Ducks is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 10:21 PM
  #347
hfboardsuser
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,283
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by D U C K S View Post
ANA: Pronger + Pahlsson

for

BOS: Bergeron, Stuart, Colborne, Lashoff, 1st 09 or 10
Along with which testicle?

hfboardsuser is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 10:23 PM
  #348
RocheBag
Registered User
 
RocheBag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CBS, Newfoundland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,101
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to RocheBag Send a message via MSN to RocheBag
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hedgehog Hodgson View Post
I don't really by the whole 'he is playing with scrubs so it is fine that he is putting up pathetic point totals' argument. Ask yourself, why is he playing with offensive scrubs? Its not like the Bruins are punishing him on purpose. If he was able to play well offensively with some of Boston's good offensive players, clearly he would be put there. There is a reason why he is playing with Axelsson, and that is because he hasn't played well offensively.

Furthermore, the fact that Bergeron plays on average, the second most powerplay time of Boston's forwards (excluding Sturm due to the small sample size,) at 3:06 minutes, and yet has put up an appallingly low 10 power play points. Thats 150 minutes, so about 1 point about every 15 minutes.
He plays with Axelsson on the checking line, because of Boston's three great Centers, Bergeron is by far the best defensively, and is the team's best defensive forward overall.

RocheBag is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 10:24 PM
  #349
bb_fan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: boston
Posts: 7,692
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeydemon05 View Post
Well, at least be realistic. No young "core" players...OK
i'd consider Bergeron.

but dont expect a big package to go with him.

be realistic the other way as well.

bb_fan is offline  
Old
03-03-2009, 10:24 PM
  #350
Analyzer
#WeAreBoston
 
Analyzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Renfrew, ON.
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,364
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb_fan View Post
why becuase they arent willing to pay what HF boards think they should?
What does hf members say they should pay ?

Analyzer is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.