HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Jack Johnson for Jordan Staal in the offseason

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-08-2009, 06:39 PM
  #126
the_speedster
Registered User
 
the_speedster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,281
vCash: 500
guess what? Today was yet ANOTHER big game.. Crosby did his part, malkin too, even tyler "man-bear-pig" kennedy...

today, what did staal do? Big game... everyone got on the ice.. where did you notice him making a difference?


the_speedster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 06:48 PM
  #127
Black1963
RH63 GRIT&CHARACTER
 
Black1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: O.C. California
Country: United States
Posts: 8,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeMeck View Post
It always truely baffles me that once a team gets 2 really good dmen that everyone else is expendable. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having too many good defensemen
From a business point there is.

You have to factor in that once there is a logjam, their value will decrease as we may be forced to move them.

Let me ask you this. How do you envision our defensive lineup to look in 2 yrs?

Black1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 07:20 PM
  #128
DeeMeck
Registered User
 
DeeMeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,308
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH63 View Post
From a business point there is.

You have to factor in that once there is a logjam, their value will decrease as we may be forced to move them.

Let me ask you this. How do you envision our defensive lineup to look in 2 yrs?
Johnson/Doughty
Quincey/Greene
Voinov/FA, Drewiske, or Martinez

Teubert and hickey in the AHL

I think in a couple years the days of seeing very young King rookies will be over. Players will be developed in the AHL the right way...

DeeMeck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 08:56 PM
  #129
JTG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Sierra Leone
Posts: 35,742
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeMeck View Post
Johnson/Doughty
Quincey/Greene
Voinov/FA, Drewiske, or Martinez

Teubert and hickey in the AHL

I think in a couple years the days of seeing very young King rookies will be over. Players will be developed in the AHL the right way...
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that two players who were both picked in the top half of the first round in their respective drafts will both be on the big squad in 2 years.

JTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 09:15 PM
  #130
MartinVanBuren
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 411
vCash: 500
Yea, I don't get Kings fans hard-on for Voinov. I'd put him there as a may be with Martinez, Hickey, and Teubert.

MartinVanBuren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:06 PM
  #131
DeeMeck
Registered User
 
DeeMeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,308
vCash: 50
It's the way Lombardi runs his ship. Voinov has seniority, period. Who woulda thought Quick would get the chance first over the highly touted first rounder (Bernier). It was all seniority.

There will no longer be a need to rush guys. Teubert is kind of a project anyways. Hickey will have a shot at it...but Voinov has seniority.

DeeMeck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:12 PM
  #132
MartinVanBuren
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 411
vCash: 500
Hickey is actually a year older than Voinov.

And I thought Quick was chosen because he played better in the A.

Moller and Simmonds made the team over Purcell out of camp. I don't really think it has anything to do with seniority.

I any case, the way I see it is:
JMFJ-Drew
Greene-Quincey
Hickey/Teubert/Martinez/Voinov

I'd include Harrold, but he's basically a 4th line forward now. It should be interesting to see if anyone from that bottom row gets traded.

MartinVanBuren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:18 PM
  #133
LAX attack*
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Danger Zone
Country: United States
Posts: 14,258
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to LAX attack*
Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinVanBuren View Post
Yea, I don't get Kings fans hard-on for Voinov. I'd put him there as a may be with Martinez, Hickey, and Teubert.
The fact that you would put Martinez with Voynov....

LAX attack* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:20 PM
  #134
AK
Registered User
 
AK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 15,525
vCash: 500
Value-wise, this is reasonable.

It just doesn't fill a need for the Penguins at all.

Johnson is of a similar pedigree to Goligoski and Letang. If Staal was going to the LAK, it would be in a deal around him for Frolov (or a different quality young winger).

AK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:21 PM
  #135
AK
Registered User
 
AK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 15,525
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_speedster View Post
guess what? Today was yet ANOTHER big game.. Crosby did his part, malkin too, even tyler "man-bear-pig" kennedy...

today, what did staal do? Big game... everyone got on the ice.. where did you notice him making a difference?

Other than his powerplay goal, when did you notice Ovechkin making a difference today?

You didn't, because Staal's line contained him all game.

The guy is a very good defensive player. He's a mediocre second line center offensively, but he is the only forward the Pens have who can play any semblance of a shutdown role.

AK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:28 PM
  #136
MartinVanBuren
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 411
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letang58 View Post
Other than his powerplay goal, when did you notice Ovechkin making a difference today?

You didn't, because Staal's line contained him all game.
AO played 15.8 even-strength minutes. Stall was on the ice for 5 of them. one-third = all game?

And Staal was PKing when Ovechkin scored. If Staal could do that all season, AO would only score 82 goals. GOOOOO STAAL!!!!

MartinVanBuren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:28 PM
  #137
JTG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Sierra Leone
Posts: 35,742
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeMeck View Post
It's the way Lombardi runs his ship. Voinov has seniority, period. Who woulda thought Quick would get the chance first over the highly touted first rounder (Bernier). It was all seniority.

There will no longer be a need to rush guys. Teubert is kind of a project anyways. Hickey will have a shot at it...but Voinov has seniority.
It's not rushing. Teubert and Hickey at the start of the 2011-12 season will most likely be very ready for the NHL. Seniority only goes so far. You don't keep players as talented and promising as Hickey and Teubert in the AHL all because of seniority. If the Kings GM infact operates like that, he will have many a front office people and talent evaluators telling him that he's running his ship like an *******.

I could also be wrong, but I do believe that Teubert was said to be one of the closest to NHL ready defensemen in his respective draft. There's not much of a project there. The guy has a meager offensive game with a downright nasty defensive game.

In all honesty, I won't be shocked if one or both will be on the NHL roster at sometime next season.

JTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 10:32 PM
  #138
JTG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Sierra Leone
Posts: 35,742
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letang58 View Post
Value-wise, this is reasonable.

It just doesn't fill a need for the Penguins at all.

Johnson is of a similar pedigree to Goligoski and Letang. If Staal was going to the LAK, it would be in a deal around him for Frolov (or a different quality young winger).
You haven't seen much of Johnson have you?

Alex Goligoski and Kris Letang he is not.

JTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 11:00 PM
  #139
MartinVanBuren
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 411
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAX attack View Post
The fact that you would put Martinez with Voynov....
They have basically identical stats.
Code:
		GP	G	A	Pts	   Pts/gm	+/-	PIM	PIM/gm
Voynov	46gp	6g	11a	17pts	   .37		0	30	.65
Martinez	61gp	8g	14a	22pts	   .36		+6	42	.69
The only difference is that Voinov is 2.5 years younger, so he has more time to improve. But both are still very young (21 and 19). If Martinez is better next season, he gets the nod if there's an opening, I think.

MartinVanBuren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2009, 11:06 PM
  #140
Rowdy Roddy Peeper
Search and Destroy
 
Rowdy Roddy Peeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,756
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_speedster View Post
guess what? Today was yet ANOTHER big game.. Crosby did his part, malkin too, even tyler "man-bear-pig" kennedy...

today, what did staal do? Big game... everyone got on the ice.. where did you notice him making a difference?

Staal's probably been better than Malkin over the previous few games, this last one notwithstanding. Not coincidentally, they occurred when he had a legit top 6 winger on his line.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andora View Post
the reason pittsburgh has to be careful IMO, is that by trading staal, you are addressing a need (solid winger) yet opening another one (solid two way third line center)

so really, do you keep it at one need and wait to see your options in the summer, or address a need while opening up another...

i'd rather the patient approach, see how kennedy keeps developing, see who's availabe in the free agent market, see who's available for trade, and see how your cheap kids do when given the opportunity (whether late this year, or in training camp next year)

no need for a panic button yet... panic or forced moves are dangerous to flirt with
It couldn't be more this.

Rowdy Roddy Peeper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 04:22 AM
  #141
lak4ever
Registered User
 
lak4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Valley Girl
Country: United States
Posts: 2,736
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MartinVanBuren View Post
Hickey is actually a year older than Voinov.

And I thought Quick was chosen because he played better in the A.

Moller and Simmonds made the team over Purcell out of camp. I don't really think it has anything to do with seniority.

I any case, the way I see it is:
JMFJ-Drew
Greene-Quincey
Hickey/Teubert/Martinez/Voinov

I'd include Harrold, but he's basically a 4th line forward now. It should be interesting to see if anyone from that bottom row gets traded.
Nope, both Quick and Bernier had similar stats. It was seniority.

lak4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 04:29 AM
  #142
aegwillnotwinthecup*
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Country: United States
Posts: 4,392
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTG32005 View Post
It's not rushing. Teubert and Hickey at the start of the 2011-12 season will most likely be very ready for the NHL. Seniority only goes so far. You don't keep players as talented and promising as Hickey and Teubert in the AHL all because of seniority. If the Kings GM infact operates like that, he will have many a front office people and talent evaluators telling him that he's running his ship like an *******.

I could also be wrong, but I do believe that Teubert was said to be one of the closest to NHL ready defensemen in his respective draft. There's not much of a project there. The guy has a meager offensive game with a downright nasty defensive game.

In all honesty, I won't be shocked if one or both will be on the NHL roster at sometime next season.
Hickey would have made the team this year if it weren't for Doughty being Doughty. Hickey will be a King at the beginning of 09/10. Teubert may or may not be called up. He's still very raw, and his mental game is nowhere near ready for the NHL just yet. Too much of a loose cannon.

aegwillnotwinthecup* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 04:33 AM
  #143
Birko19
Registered User
 
Birko19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ont
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,834
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by voxel View Post
Jordan Staal is worth more than Brad Stuart 2.0
Jordan Staal is not anything to rave home about either, certainly not 2nd overall material if you ask me, what is he? 40 point player? 50 point player? Yea, 2nd overall my ass, the Pens are lucky Crosby and Malkin turned out to be stars because Staal at number 2 is a laughing stock.

Birko19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 04:46 AM
  #144
Tender Rip
No cap on coaching!
 
Tender Rip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 10,646
vCash: 500
L.A Kings have a great number of promising defenders, and generally a great number of very interesting young players. We'll see when they have a playoff team. No dissing, just saying.

And considering that Staal has accomplished much more than Jack Johnson, I would certainly not do this switch one for one. Perhaps the most skiilllzzzz loving fan boys out there are unable to fathom that it has consequences to the role you're assigned and the duties you're expect to focus on when you're a third line center at Pittsburgh Penguins. Staal should put up points, yes, but getting very little game by game playmaking responsibility, or scoring line caliber linemates, we cannot expect him to torch other teams.
He'll likely get 20+ goals and 45 points this year still, to go with solid D and PK'ing. Hopefully continuing his fine playoff performances for a third year running. When your role is decidedly a defensive one and your path to a scoring line role is blocked by the best two centers in the game.... and you're 20 years old, well.... most of us take that and smile.

Doesn't mean Shero couldn't find any reasons to trading Jordan Staal in the off season, but he has done much more to meet expectations so far, and done more to make his team successfull, than Jack MF Johnson. LA would have to add, and Johnson would have to come signed at an appetizing cap hit.

I understand why Kings fans will want to hang on to Johnson, fair enough. There's lots of unrealized upside there, and your other youngsters aren't really ready to carry the team save for Doughty. Johnson at least should be. But he hasn't done enough to merit the return of Staal, and we would lose that deal as regards the value of assets changing.

Tender Rip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 06:08 AM
  #145
Brandinho
Registered User
 
Brandinho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: República de Cuba
Country: Cuba
Posts: 10,271
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Brandinho Send a message via Skype™ to Brandinho
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birko19 View Post
Jordan Staal is not anything to rave home about either, certainly not 2nd overall material if you ask me, what is he? 40 point player? 50 point player? Yea, 2nd overall my ass, the Pens are lucky Crosby and Malkin turned out to be stars because Staal at number 2 is a laughing stock.
He was a 40 point player at 18.

He's 20 and on pace for 44 points. He's a brilliant defensive player. His offensive game is still developing. He was the right pick at #2 and I'd take him there again. How quickly people forget that he's been absolutely brilliant in the playoffs, when players of his ilk matter the most. He's a bigger, much younger, much more skilled version of Sami Pahlsson. If you don't understand the value that this type of player has, you don't understand how to construct a winning hockey team.

Brandinho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 06:18 AM
  #146
AK
Registered User
 
AK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 15,525
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTG32005 View Post
You haven't seen much of Johnson have you?

Alex Goligoski and Kris Letang he is not.
Considering what they have accomplished in their still young careers, they are of very similar pedigrees.

AK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 06:42 AM
  #147
voxel
Unsustainable Eberle
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida
Country: United States
Posts: 10,316
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birko19 View Post
Jordan Staal is not anything to rave home about either, certainly not 2nd overall material if you ask me, what is he? 40 point player? 50 point player? Yea, 2nd overall my ass, the Pens are lucky Crosby and Malkin turned out to be stars because Staal at number 2 is a laughing stock.
I think Staal is overrated too, but every time I watch JJ I think he's got 10 dollar skill and 2 cents for a brain... ala Brad Stuart. Too aggressive - always looking to be physical. Also, he still isn't very effective in board battles and he's terrible at neutralizing opponent forwards in the slot area. But wow he can pass and shoot! Doughty is all kinds of awesome. JJ is not.

Some fans will point to JJ's -15 and blame Gauthier, but JJ is a drag on everybody:

http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/2008...player0579.php

If JJ was developed like Phanuef (bottom-pairing / sheltered minutes on a winning team) maybe he could develop into a good D-man.

In the end, I pick the smarter player (Staal) over the one likely to be shuttled around the league over the next 10 years.

voxel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 08:29 AM
  #148
Birko19
Registered User
 
Birko19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ont
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,834
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandinho View Post
He was a 40 point player at 18.

He's 20 and on pace for 44 points. He's a brilliant defensive player. His offensive game is still developing. He was the right pick at #2 and I'd take him there again. How quickly people forget that he's been absolutely brilliant in the playoffs, when players of his ilk matter the most. He's a bigger, much younger, much more skilled version of Sami Pahlsson. If you don't understand the value that this type of player has, you don't understand how to construct a winning hockey team.
I never said Staal was a bad player, very good player indeed, and you're right, he's similar to a Sami Pahlsson, but Pahlssons don't get drafted 2nd overall, at least not head of the 4 other guys taken behind him.

Quote:
I think Staal is overrated too, but every time I watch JJ I think he's got 10 dollar skill and 2 cents for a brain... ala Brad Stuart. Too aggressive - always looking to be physical. Also, he still isn't very effective in board battles and he's terrible at neutralizing opponent forwards in the slot area. But wow he can pass and shoot! Doughty is all kinds of awesome. JJ is not.

Some fans will point to JJ's -15 and blame Gauthier, but JJ is a drag on everybody:

http://stats.hockeyanalysis.com/2008...player0579.php

If JJ was developed like Phanuef (bottom-pairing / sheltered minutes on a winning team) maybe he could develop into a good D-man.

In the end, I pick the smarter player (Staal) over the one likely to be shuttled around the league over the next 10 years.
I'm not comparing him to JJ, I'm just saying that Staal at number two when you have the likes of Toews and Backstrom is seriously as stupid as it gets, but then again the Pens had Crosby and Malkin, the smart thing was to flip the 2nd overall for a top d-man (Like Bouwmeester for example)

Birko19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 09:18 AM
  #149
lumbergh
Registered User
 
lumbergh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Country: Taiwan
Posts: 1,278
vCash: 500
TearsofaClown makes it to the big time:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/blog/puc...aining-content

Scroll down to the bottom of the post.

Congrats, and Kudos to you, sir.

lumbergh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-09-2009, 09:39 AM
  #150
JTG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Sierra Leone
Posts: 35,742
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letang58 View Post
Considering what they have accomplished in their still young careers, they are of very similar pedigrees.
They are completely different players.

Jack Johnson has more nastiness to his game than Goligoski and Letang combined.

JTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.