HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Avalanche - Ducks

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-18-2009, 10:22 PM
  #1
shadow1
Registered User
 
shadow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 11,301
vCash: 1210
Avalanche - Ducks

To Colorado:
Pronger (6.25)
Carter (0.625)
'09 2nd

To Anaheim:
Hannan (4.50)
Clark (3.50)
Wolski (2.80)

---

Avs get: Top 5 defenseman, young checking line center, pick to help rebuild.

Ducks get: Two solid defenseman (both signed), and a young scoring C/LW.

shadow1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-18-2009, 10:41 PM
  #2
Stories
Hockey scientist
 
Stories's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Country: United States
Posts: 6,302
vCash: 500
Wolski is one of the key components of the Avs rebuilding. Pronger is a (dirty) stud, but he will hinder our rebuilding because he improves the team.

Stories is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-18-2009, 11:01 PM
  #3
shadow1
Registered User
 
shadow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 11,301
vCash: 1210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stories View Post
Wolski is one of the key components of the Avs rebuilding. Pronger is a (dirty) stud, but he will hinder our rebuilding because he improves the team.
Rebuilding doesn't mean the team has to be bad, unless the goal is tanking. A guy like Nigel Williams would only benefit with Pronger as an influence.

shadow1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-18-2009, 11:01 PM
  #4
Randall Graves*
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 18,621
vCash: 500
Not even close, Hannan looked like crap last year..

Randall Graves* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-18-2009, 11:15 PM
  #5
shadow1
Registered User
 
shadow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 11,301
vCash: 1210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Graves View Post
Not even close, Hannan looked like crap last year..
He hasn't been as physical as he was expected to be when he was signed, but he's solid positionally. Despite common belief, the Avs defense was that bad this year: 9th fewest shots allowed in the league. The reason for the glaring minuses were the men between the pipes.

shadow1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-18-2009, 11:28 PM
  #6
Paul4587
Registered User
 
Paul4587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 13,908
vCash: 500
Wolski is intruiging but it's no where enough value for Pronger, especially considering the Avalanche would be dumping two overpriced defensemen on the Ducks. If Colorado is rebuilding what's the point in acquiring Pronger??

Ducks don't have an '09 second either.

Paul4587 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-18-2009, 11:40 PM
  #7
shadow1
Registered User
 
shadow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 11,301
vCash: 1210
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul4587 View Post
Wolski is intruiging but it's no where enough value for Pronger, especially considering the Avalanche would be dumping two overpriced defensemen on the Ducks. If Colorado is rebuilding what's the point in acquiring Pronger??

Ducks don't have an '09 second either.
He's awesome, and probably have five or more good years left in him. He's the ultimate Red Wing hater; it would be a shame if he never plays for Colorado in his career.

shadow1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 12:30 AM
  #8
falconski
Unregistered User
 
falconski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,073
vCash: 500
we need to get rid of Cloutier for any deal involving Pronger to be considered

falconski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 01:00 AM
  #9
SoundwaveIsCharisma
Moderator
 
SoundwaveIsCharisma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Screw You Blaster
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,042
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to SoundwaveIsCharisma
It really depends on if Pronger would sign an extension, it would suck to give up good players...and Clark for Pronger if he just decides to leave...for nothing.

SoundwaveIsCharisma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 01:02 AM
  #10
crucifux
 
crucifux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 1,032
vCash: 500
The ducks get ***** on that one.... so I'm down

crucifux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 01:26 AM
  #11
Jori
Registered User
 
Jori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 20,199
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Jori
Quote:
Originally Posted by falconski View Post
we need to get rid of Cloutier for any deal involving Pronger to be considered
Bingo! Cloutier would make Pronger as soft as charmin.

__________________
Colorado Avalanche Prospects-- News and updates on the future of the Colorado Avalanche!
Colorado's Future -- Team * Manning * MacKinnon * Tulowitzki?
Jori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 01:34 AM
  #12
nilssont
Registered User
 
nilssont's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Country: Sweden
Posts: 604
vCash: 500
1. No
2. Too much salary going to Anaheim

nilssont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 01:37 AM
  #13
shadow1
Registered User
 
shadow1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 11,301
vCash: 1210
Quote:
Originally Posted by falconski View Post
we need to get rid of Cloutier for any deal involving Pronger to be considered
Cloutier couldn't change him; Cloutier only messes up our young guys. Over the years, the defensemen we've already developed (Foote) or acquired and were developed by someone else (Blake) have been fine.

Then again...Scott Hannan...

shadow1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 10:03 AM
  #14
Jori
Registered User
 
Jori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 20,199
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Jori
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadow1 View Post
Cloutier couldn't change him; Cloutier only messes up our young guys. Over the years, the defensemen we've already developed (Foote) or acquired and were developed by someone else (Blake) have been fine.

Then again...Scott Hannan...
It's not just young players. Look at how Salei has played this season in comparison to last season.
Posted via Mobile Device

Jori is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 10:07 AM
  #15
Flyboy34
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 33,000 FT
Posts: 247
vCash: 500
The Ducks wouldn't trade Pronger within the conference unless it was an overpayment.

I don't see Colorado making this trade, to much youth leaves the team. With Sakic nearing retirement, I don't see them moving Wolski.

Flyboy34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-19-2009, 12:43 PM
  #16
Huis Clos*
Creamy Hamstrings
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ballarado
Country: United States
Posts: 6,020
vCash: 500
I'm sure the Ducks would find Wolski intriguing, but I doubt they'd be interested in swapping Hannan for Pronger. Not to mention the amount of salary that is going the Ducks way.

Huis Clos* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.