HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Calgary Flames
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Lundmark gone?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-29-2009, 08:32 PM
  #1
Skobel24
#Ignited
 
Skobel24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,237
vCash: 50
Lundmark gone?

I hope not, any chance we see him back on the team next season?

Skobel24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2009, 08:49 PM
  #2
Northern Neighbour
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,683
vCash: 500
He ran hot and cold last year. He would be a good depth guy, but the Flames need to give the kids a chance. Also, the Flames could use more skilled guys with size upfront.

Northern Neighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2009, 08:51 PM
  #3
Skobel24
#Ignited
 
Skobel24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,237
vCash: 50
I hope he comes back. I have a man crush on the guy, and after watching him play during that cold streak near the end of the season, he was the only player I noticed every night.

Skobel24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2009, 09:03 PM
  #4
Puckz
Registered User
 
Puckz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kelowna, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,126
vCash: 500
Martin St.Louis 2.0? We let him go at 25 years old... nah just kidding.

I think that ship has sailed but regardless Lundmark can still be an effective depth player, don't think he should ever feature on the top two lines though.

Puckz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2009, 09:06 PM
  #5
Skobel24
#Ignited
 
Skobel24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,237
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puckz View Post
Martin St.Louis 2.0? We let him go at 25 years old... nah just kidding.

I think that ship has sailed but regardless Lundmark can still be an effective depth player, don't think he should ever feature on the top two lines though.
This is where I'm torn. At times, he's shown he can be a top player on the ice, then he disappears. He's still fairly young, and I'd hate to see him turn into something more if we let him go.

Skobel24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-29-2009, 09:26 PM
  #6
Flames 1st pick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,058
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Neighbour View Post
He ran hot and cold last year. He would be a good depth guy, but the Flames need to give the kids a chance. .
What kids? Not sure Backlund is ready, Nemisz is definitely not ready....Sutter?Chucko? give me a break....there are no other kids.

I like Lundmark...he has some skills and can be used for at time for cheap.

Flames 1st pick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2009, 12:15 AM
  #7
flamesfever
Registered User
 
flamesfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 540
vCash: 500
He is a serviceable depth player who showed signs of offensive flashes. I think if he comes in at an affordable price we should sign him. He does seem to disappear on some nights, almost to the point of extinction...then he appears to cycle the puck by himself in the corner and then...well...lose it.

Sign him, i'm concerned about our secondary scoring this year and he can help.

I don't have a decent take on his defensive capabilities; anyone else. Can he take on third line checking role?

flamesfever is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2009, 02:23 AM
  #8
flamesfan12
Registered User
 
flamesfan12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Beaumont
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,970
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to flamesfan12 Send a message via MSN to flamesfan12 Send a message via Yahoo to flamesfan12
He's not a guy I'd want consistantly in our top 6. I have no problem with him coming back as a depth guy that can fill in if neccessary. He will come cheap, likes Calgary and is a guy that can get hot. Personally I'd rather have Boyd playing the minutes in the top 6while Lundmark is a depth guy.

flamesfan12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2009, 11:11 AM
  #9
Northern Neighbour
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,683
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallas Flames Fan View Post
What kids? Not sure Backlund is ready, Nemisz is definitely not ready....Sutter?Chucko? give me a break....there are no other kids.

I like Lundmark...he has some skills and can be used for at time for cheap.
You're forgetting Boyd. It's time for Boyd to step up into a top-6 or top-9 role. I also think Backlund will be given every opportunity to win a job on the top-2 lines.

Northern Neighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2009, 11:18 AM
  #10
Skobel24
#Ignited
 
Skobel24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,237
vCash: 50
I'm calling it right now, and will be the first to say it. If we let him go, we will regret it. $50 bucks.

Edit: It's gonna suck if he leaves, his name is on my jersey. Well, one of my jerseys anyways.

Skobel24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2009, 11:32 AM
  #11
ComixZone
Registered User
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,654
vCash: 500
The fact that he's one of the guys that Sportsnet reports having spoke to bouwmeester, I wouldn't be surprised to see him re-sign. 700k for a 1 way deal

Bourque - Langkow - Iginla
Backlund - Jokinen - Moss
Glencross - Conroy - Lundmark
Nystrom - Boyd - Prust
Greentree/Peters

Bouwmeester - Phaneuf
Regehr - Sarich
Giordano - Pelech
Negrin
(I'm assuming Pardy leaves via UFA)

ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2009, 11:36 AM
  #12
Skobel24
#Ignited
 
Skobel24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,237
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT Cool View Post
The fact that he's one of the guys that Sportsnet reports having spoke to bouwmeester, I wouldn't be surprised to see him re-sign. 700k for a 1 way deal

Bourque - Langkow - Iginla
Backlund - Jokinen - Moss
Glencross - Conroy - Lundmark
Nystrom - Boyd - Prust
Greentree/Peters

Bouwmeester - Phaneuf
Regehr - Sarich
Giordano - Pelech
Negrin
(I'm assuming Pardy leaves via UFA)
If Backlund plays, I want him to develop on center. Swap him and Boyd. and I really hope we can hang onto Pardy, but it doesn't look good.
Edit: Maybe even put Jokinen on the wing, he can shoot, and he isn't great at the faceoffs, then Have Backlund center him.


Last edited by Skobel24: 06-30-2009 at 11:46 AM.
Skobel24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-30-2009, 12:53 PM
  #13
Flames 1st pick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,058
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern Neighbour View Post
You're forgetting Boyd. It's time for Boyd to step up into a top-6 or top-9 role. I also think Backlund will be given every opportunity to win a job on the top-2 lines.
No i didnt forget Boyd, he already has a spot in the lineup. It's his to lose regardless of Lundmark.

Flames 1st pick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.