HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)

Best all time "big three" defense

View Poll Results: Best big three of all time?
Robinson - Savard - Lapointe 112 55.45%
Stevens - Niedermayer - Rafalski 63 31.19%
Pronger - Niedermayer - Beauchemin 12 5.94%
Lidstrom - Rafalski - Kronwall 13 6.44%
Other (please name) 2 0.99%
Voters: 202. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-11-2009, 12:34 PM
  #1
McNuts
Registered User
 
McNuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,824
vCash: 500
Best all time "big three" defense

Which of these "big three" defensemen were most dominant at their time?

McNuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 12:51 PM
  #2
flyguy
Sean Cubeturier
 
flyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seward, Alaska
Country: United States
Posts: 6,180
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to flyguy
I voted for the threesome who helped their team win 6 Cups. It's not even close.

flyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 12:52 PM
  #3
Nordic*
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tellus
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 12,611
vCash: 500
The retired players always win anyway, whats the use of these polls?

Nordic* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 12:57 PM
  #4
Grove
Registered User
 
Grove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Country: Finland
Posts: 426
vCash: 500
Rafalski?
Kronwall?
Beauchemin?


Are you kidding? They're all good defensemen but come on.

Grove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 01:03 PM
  #5
DOOMGUY*
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 396
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nordic View Post
The retired players always win anyway, whats the use of these polls?
We heard you the first dozen times you pasted this into a thread. Would you like to make the case that that Robinson, Savard and Lapointe are not the best option?

DOOMGUY* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 01:16 PM
  #6
Wetcoaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 54,911
vCash: 500
You would also have to consider Doug Harvey, Butch Bouchard and Tom Johnson.

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 01:17 PM
  #7
Analyzer
#WeAreBoston
 
Analyzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Renfrew, ON.
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,571
vCash: 500
You should just take out Robinson, Savard and Lapointe and then stick with the other 3.

Analyzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 01:18 PM
  #8
Burnaby_Joe*
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,271
vCash: 500
Robinson, Savard and Lapointe

Bourque, Blake and Foote should should be in the poll, too.


Last edited by Burnaby_Joe*: 07-11-2009 at 01:46 PM.
Burnaby_Joe* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 01:30 PM
  #9
Boxscore
pre-Dead Puck Era
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1992-93
Posts: 4,106
vCash: 500
The Habs trio.

Boxscore is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 02:06 PM
  #10
Rowdy Roddy Peeper
Burkupine
 
Rowdy Roddy Peeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 41,434
vCash: 500
The Habs trio, without a second thought. All-time though, there are a few (not mentioned here) who could give them a run for their money.

Horton, Brewer, Stanley and Shore, Clapper, Hollett come to mind.

Rowdy Roddy Peeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 02:08 PM
  #11
Burnaby_Joe*
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,271
vCash: 500
Nordic never seems to amaze me.

Burnaby_Joe* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 02:29 PM
  #12
Hockey Outsider
Registered User
 
Hockey Outsider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,341
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by McNuts View Post
Which of these "big three" defensemen were most dominant at their time?
PLAYER NORRIS N FIN HART H FIN SMYTHE
Robinson 2 8 1 1
Savard 4 1
Lapointe 6
MONTREAL 2 18 0 1 2
Stevens 7 1
Niedermayer 1 4 1
Rafalski
NEW JERSEY 1 11 0 0 2
Pronger 1 6 1 1
Niedermayer 1 4 1
Beachemin
ANAHEIM 2 10 1 1 1
Lidstrom 6 10 1 1
Rafalski
Kronwall
DETROIT 6 10 0 1 1

Chart shows: Norris trophies won, year in top five in Norris voting, Hart trophies won, year in top five in Hart voting, Conn Smythes won.

Based on how the question is worded, the only reasonable answer is Robinson, Savard, Lapointe. They're the only team list where all three defensemen contended for the Norris trophy on a regular basis. Two Conn Smythes don't hurt either (NJ also has two Smythes but Niedermayer's was won while in Anaheim).


Last edited by Hockey Outsider: 07-12-2009 at 06:04 PM.
Hockey Outsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 02:32 PM
  #13
Psycho Papa Joe
Porkchop Hoser
 
Psycho Papa Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cesspool, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,357
vCash: 500
In 1977 the Habs had 3 d-men out of 4 spots represented on the post season all star team, during one of the deepest eras ever for top flight d-men. Game, Set, Match

Psycho Papa Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-11-2009, 06:45 PM
  #14
Hero
Raptors 13/14
 
Hero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18,772
vCash: 50
6 cups, thank you.

Hero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 12:53 AM
  #15
arrbez
bad chi
 
arrbez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,611
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to arrbez
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Shogun_ View Post
Nordic never seems to amaze me.
The word you were probably looking for is "ceases", but it actually came out pretty funny anyways .

arrbez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 01:56 AM
  #16
Nordic*
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tellus
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 12,611
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Shogun_ View Post
Nordic never seems to amaze me.
Hehe...I'm sorry to hear that, I'll try a little harder in the future - just for you!

Nordic* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 02:28 AM
  #17
TheDevilMadeMe
Global Moderator
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 37,801
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Outsider View Post
PLAYER NORRIS N FIN HART H FIN SMYTHE
Robinson 2 8 1 1
Savard 4 1
Lapointe 6
MONTREAL 2 18 0 1 2
Stevens 7 1
Niedermayer 1 4 1
Rafalski
NEW JERSEY 1 11 0 0 2
Pronger 1 6 1 1
Niedermayer 1 4 1
Beachemin
ANAHEIM 2 10 1 1 1
Lidstrom 6 10 1
Rafalski
Kronwall
DETROIT 6 10 0 1 0

Chart shows: Norris trophies won, year in top five in Norris voting, Hart trophies won, year in top five in Hart voting, Conn Smythes won.

Based on how the question is worded, the only reasonable answer is Robinson, Savard, Lapointe. They're the only team list where all three defensemen contended for the Norris trophy on a regular basis. Two Conn Smythes don't hurt either (NJ also has two Smythes but Niedermayer's was won while in Anaheim).
Great chart. You're missing a Smythe for Lidstrom, though. Anyway, your chart perfectly illustrates why Montreal's trio beats NJ's trio with no contest - Rafalski isn't on the same level as the other guys.

Personally, I'd pick Stevens, Niedermayer, Daneyko as the Devil's defensive core over 3 Cups, but it obviously doesn't make a difference in the results.

TheDevilMadeMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 02:57 AM
  #18
190Octane
Registered User
 
190Octane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fullerton, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 6,582
vCash: 500
I think Niedermayer-Pronger-Whitney is better.

190Octane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 12:57 PM
  #19
Xspyrit
Registered User
 
Xspyrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monterrey, Mexico
Country: Italy
Posts: 13,139
vCash: 500
You guys can't compare different Eras. Not as many teams before, not as many rounds in the playoffs, different rules fro drafting,... The cup seems way harder to win today than before...

Xspyrit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 02:25 PM
  #20
Big Phil
Registered User
 
Big Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,012
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xspyrit View Post
You guys can't compare different Eras. Not as many teams before, not as many rounds in the playoffs, different rules fro drafting,... The cup seems way harder to win today than before...
That is a copout of an excuse. People that refuse to look past stats and size of a goalie's equipment believe that eras can't be compared. It is very easy to compare eras in fact. You compare them to their peers. That's all. How did Robinson, Savard and Lapointe compare? No team at that time was even close defensively.

Oh yeah and you need to educate yourself a bit better when talking about it being easy to win Cups. Ask Gordie Howe if Rocket Richard curled up into a ball while they played together? Do you think the '70 Bruins and '70s Flyers didnt do everything in their power to beat the Habs? It has NEVER been easy to win the Stanley Cup. It has NEVER been easy to win two Cups in a row. And regardless of the era it has NEVER been easy to win 5 Cups in a row which is why only one team has done it. Capish?

Big Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 03:25 PM
  #21
r0bert8841
Registered User
 
r0bert8841's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,425
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to r0bert8841
How about Lidstrom-Konstantinov-Coffey/Murphy or
Lidstrom-Chelios-Murphy-Ulf Samuelsson

r0bert8841 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 04:03 PM
  #22
Wetcoaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 54,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xspyrit View Post
You guys can't compare different Eras. Not as many teams before, not as many rounds in the playoffs, different rules fro drafting,... The cup seems way harder to win today than before...
You can consider dominant in their era.

In that case Original 6 would be the Habs with Harvey, Johnson and Bouchard (if you considered 4 you could make a good case for Horton, Stanley, Baun and Brewer).

In post expansion it would be the Habs with Savard, Robinson and Lapointe.

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 04:07 PM
  #23
CrosbyCrosby*
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,216
vCash: 500
more old timer bias

CrosbyCrosby* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 04:41 PM
  #24
Wetcoaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Out There
Posts: 54,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrosbyCrosby View Post
more old timer bias
How so?

Wetcoaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2009, 06:04 PM
  #25
Hockey Outsider
Registered User
 
Hockey Outsider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,341
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrosbyCrosby View Post
more old timer bias
It's always easier to assert, but not prove, bias, rather than respond to carefully documented facts (see post #12).

Hockey Outsider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.