Better defense going forward?
|
View Poll Results: ?
|
|
Chicago-Keith, Seabrook, Campbell, Barker, Hjalmarsson, Johnson, Hendry
|
   
|
15 |
29.41% |
|
Nashville-Weber, Suter, Hamhuis, Klein, Sulzer, Franson, Blum
|
  
|
32 |
62.75% |
|
Anaheim-Niedermayer, Wisniewski, Whitney, Sbisa, Boynton, Mitera, Gardiner
|
  
|
4 |
7.84% |
 |
07-17-2009, 05:35 PM
|
#1
|
|
Finally
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Country: 
Posts: 15,756
vCash: 50
|
Better defense going forward?
Which defense would you choose in the long term?
|
|
|
|
07-17-2009, 05:56 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Country: 
Posts: 7,068
vCash: 907
|
Definitely Nashville.
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2009, 06:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minny
Country:
Posts: 10,688
vCash: 500
|
Chicago's is already rocking the NHL. Nashville's might someday. Anaheim has a star about ready to quit. Easy choice.
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2009, 06:32 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11,986
vCash: 500
|
At first glance Nashville. After considering prospect pools and Campbells hideous contract then it's most definitely Nashville.
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Search and Destroy
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 34,756
vCash: 500
|
Nashville. Especially considering Ellis.
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2009, 07:41 PM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,899
vCash: 500
|
oh sorry! didnt see long-term. i clicked before reading.
def. def. def. nashville. not even close.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM.
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
|
