HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Edmonton Oilers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Gilbert + O'Sullivan for David Backes

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-01-2009, 05:26 PM
  #26
Jimmi Jenkins
Just Walk Away
 
Jimmi Jenkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 38,918
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabid Ranger View Post
Oh, I don't know. Their career high in points is about the same (mid 40s). I do have more hope for Gilbert than Preissing at this stage of the game though. Tommy will never be a banger, but he can compete harder and work on positioning. The points will come. As for the trade proposal. No way do the Blues do it. Backes is considered a core player who is likely captain material in near future. He's a huge, physical presence who is capable of 30+ goals (which he had last year). He's had a slow start to this year points wise, but has still played a reliable defensive game while cutting back on stupid penalities. Thankfully his production has started to come of late.
I'm not going to argue the Backes part and his value to the Blues, but Preissing didn't put up his numbers his 2nd year in the NHL, and he Preissing out preformed his abilities in that season, where as Gilbert still has room to grow.

Tom Preissing couldn't imagine being as good as Tom Gilbert, even this season.

Jimmi Jenkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-01-2009, 06:07 PM
  #27
oilersrule14
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,443
vCash: 500
I think that's a good proposal of how to give to get. Gilbert had just 9 less points than Backes last year, and he's a dman. O'Sullivan just 2 years ago put up a season very similar to Backes' best. They're all American players and that might mean something to someone like John Davidson. If Davidson has an affinity to either of those two players, this is definitely a deal he would make. Good proposal.

oilersrule14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-01-2009, 08:30 PM
  #28
Nols
Registered User
 
Nols's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,355
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by n00b1AnPr1nc355 View Post
None the less I am wrong if others here think it is right. I thought the majority would agree with me that proposals would just clutter his board. If we all threw down proposals wouldn't it not feel cluttered? Are they best not left for the proposal board?

Honestly, i thought i was in the majority. and I owe the OP an apology for being so harsh.
No worries.

Nols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2009, 05:40 AM
  #29
Finger Post
Registered User
 
Finger Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 915
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nols View Post
Gilbert + O'Sullivan for David Backes
I suppose it has to be said that it seems like a team of O'Gilbert and O'Sullivan should make a very creative partnership ... maybe even operatic.

Finger Post is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2009, 06:10 AM
  #30
hemskysuncle
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 542
vCash: 500
I think the proposal stinks.








just kidding. however, I do think that the Blues would be very wary of taking on such an increase in salary. Aren't the owners still holding the purse a little tight? or have they loosened up a bit and raised the budget?

I would love to have Backes. he will be a Mcguire monster on many occasions throughout his career.

hemskysuncle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2009, 01:28 PM
  #31
OilerzFRLife
 
OilerzFRLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: African Jungles
Posts: 919
vCash: 500
backes wouldnt be offered up unless you were talking for cogliano. cogs for backes is alot more fair. maybe a pick on our side of the high number and its a done deal

OilerzFRLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-02-2009, 01:34 PM
  #32
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,343
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilerzFRLife View Post
backes wouldnt be offered up unless you were talking for cogliano. cogs for backes is alot more fair. maybe a pick on our side of the high number and its a done deal
IMO.. O'Sullivan has as much value as Cogliano if not more..

Ideally we would be trading our small struggling players for bigger struggling young players..

Guys like Backes and Mueller should be our prime targets..
Softer guys being the bait.

Give Quinn the size he wants and see how far can he take this team..

Petro Points is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-04-2009, 03:32 PM
  #33
ponokanocker
Registered User
 
ponokanocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,159
vCash: 500
I love the trade for Edmonton. A large, physical forward with the ability to score(this year, not so well so far), and we get rid of 2 non-physical players with little heart. There is no way St. Louis will take on that much extra salary though.

ponokanocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-04-2009, 04:05 PM
  #34
Rabid Ranger
2 is better than one
 
Rabid Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Murica
Country: United States
Posts: 19,562
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by OilerzFRLife View Post
backes wouldnt be offered up unless you were talking for cogliano. cogs for backes is alot more fair. maybe a pick on our side of the high number and its a done deal
No, its not a done deal. The pot would have to be pretty sweet for the Blues to part with Backes in ANY deal. Cogs and a pick isn't going to do it.

Rabid Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-04-2009, 04:17 PM
  #35
Oiler Crude
3rd rate fan
 
Oiler Crude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 745
vCash: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Post View Post
I suppose it has to be said that it seems like a team of O'Gilbert and O'Sullivan should make a very creative partnership ... maybe even operatic.
Boooooo!!!!!! LOL, nice one Gene Principe !!

Oiler Crude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.