Give me a break, those guys are far from being genius.
Those a guys got a extremely selective memory of the history of Quebec and Canada. Those guys know want they want to know.
They are probably the most biased persons I ever saw on this planet with a high level of cockiness. I seriously got not respect for those guys.
Couldn't we say the same about many english canadian medias? This always been normal, but geez don't ever be a Quebecer who select his pieces of history you'll be instantly biased.
Couldn't we say the same about many english canadian medias? This always been normal, but geez don't ever be a Quebecer who select his pieces of history you'll be instantly biased.
If you select pieces of history you are not being objective therefore you are biased
If you select pieces of history you are not being objective therefore you are biased
Really? So a guy who writes about the Nazis in WWII is biased cause he selected pieces of history? Whatever, go read a good book instead of trying to claim that Loco Locass is overbiased. Everything, everybody everywhere is biased so what's the debate for?
Really? So a guy who writes about the Nazis in WWII is biased cause he selected pieces of history? Whatever, go read a good book instead of trying to claim that Loco Locass is overbiased. Everything, everybody everywhere is biased so what's the debate for?
A guy who writes about the Nazis in WW2 and talks of their victories, glorifies their cause by thoroughly explaining why the USSR is evil and how justified attacking them was, describes the terrible suffering of the german people under allied bombs and omits mentionning the Nazis happened to murder millions of people and lead Europe to the brink of destruction is biaised yes. You can select pieces of history of course, an historian could write about the German perspective during the battle of Stalingrad for instance without being biased. He can still become biaised however if his point is to prove the Arian race can withstand terrible perils and could go on fighting against vastly numerically superior "bolchevik" forces. He's not if he tries to find the recap the truth regardless of his own political alliegance.
Its an extreme example (hey you brought up the nazis in the first place!), but when you select a part of history and only bring up the parts of it that support your agenda then you are biaised. Loco Locass have a bunch of agendas, which is ok since they are a band, and bands have purpose. However this means they are by no attached with the concerns of an historian! I would not trust them to teach history to my kids unless I wanted them to believe Quebec is some kind of occupied and colonised land.
I also laugh at the claim that they know "more than all of us combined". I actually take offense to it, the guys were theater and recreology students ****! I bet there are a bunch of guys around here who actually study economy, politics and history and might know better than they do.
Last edited by FlyingKostitsyn: 01-24-2010 at 10:19 PM.
if that's a sign of what's going to happen, there will be no series. Both Montreal goalies looked so bad. It will be a non-event if it's an indication.
if that's a sign of what's going to happen, there will be no series. Both Montreal goalies looked so bad. It will be a non-event if it's an indication.
