HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Rangers' Top 20 Prospects POLL (#8)

View Poll Results: Who is the Rangers' #8 Prospect?
Ivan Baranka 20 27.03%
Nigel Dawes 11 14.86%
Jarkko Immonen 20 27.03%
Marcus Jonasen 1 1.35%
Bryce Lampman 0 0%
Dominic Moore 3 4.05%
Garth Murray 7 9.46%
R.J. Umberger 12 16.22%
Other (Specify) 0 0%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-10-2004, 01:01 PM
  #1
bmoak
Registered User
 
bmoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,636
vCash: 500
Rangers' Top 20 Prospects POLL (#8)

POLL IS CLOSED! PLEASE MOVE ON TO POLL FOR PROSPECT #9!

Well, that was a fast 60 votes for #7. The polls still open, but we have an effective winner, with Mad Max Kondratiev more than doubling his nearest competitor. We haven't had a close one since the 3-way race for the #2 spot.

As of now, Rangers' prospects stand as follows:

1) Fedor Tjutin
2) Henrik Lundqvist
3) Josef Balej
4) Hugh Jessiman
5) Thomas Pock
6) Petr Prucha
7) Maxim Kondratiev

Who is the Rangers' #8 Prospect?

Have to say I'm surpised at the low turnout for Umberger (although I haven't voted for him myself).

I'll be adding more names after round 10. Right now, I'm looking at going with Giroux, Helminen, Liffiton, Walsh, and Wiseman


Last edited by bmoak: 05-11-2004 at 08:09 AM. Reason: Notification
bmoak is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 01:08 PM
  #2
bmoak
Registered User
 
bmoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,636
vCash: 500
Walsh? Where's my brain? I meant Jake Taylor.

bmoak is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 01:17 PM
  #3
Larry Melnyk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gloomsville, USA
Posts: 4,376
vCash: 500
Personally, I don't even consider Umberger because of his unsigned status...

Good idea to be adding more players at #10..Might also consider expanding the candidate list to include about 15 players---write-ins rarely win---because these players will be so close....Guys like Guenin, Marek, Moore, Potter and Reese might be just as valid as the others...

And I know he's the #3 goalie on the prospect totem pole, but what about JASON LABARBERRA after his fantastic AHL season? Or is he too old?

Oh yeah, my vote for #8 is JARKO!!

Larry Melnyk is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 01:50 PM
  #4
bmoak
Registered User
 
bmoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,636
vCash: 500
I don't want to expand the number of prospects on the beyond 10, since it will dilute the vote and slow down the polls. I'll add in new names more often once we get into the double digit prospects.

LaBarbera squeaks in under the age requirement, but he's played too many minor pro seasons as per HF rules. Same thing with Jan Marek.

There are 2 Ks in JarKKo. At least spell his name right if you're going to vote for him.

bmoak is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 01:59 PM
  #5
Shadowtron
Registered User
 
Shadowtron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,534
vCash: 500
I voted for Dawes.

Also, I'd consider taking RJ off the list. He's the 46th (is that right???) selection in this year's draft as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't put him on unless the Rangers somehow manage to get him under a contract.

Shadowtron is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:03 PM
  #6
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 30,467
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowtron
I voted for Dawes.

Also, I'd consider taking RJ off the list. He's the 46th (is that right???) selection in this year's draft as far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't put him on unless the Rangers somehow manage to get him under a contract.

I agree. With both statements.

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:10 PM
  #7
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,647
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Melnyk
Personally, I don't even consider Umberger because of his unsigned status...
Agreed. Umberber is not joining the Rangers, so then there is really no point in pontificating about where to place him within our prospect pool.
The next 2 have got to be Liffiton & Baranka. Have to be ahead of Immonen since it does not even sound like there have been much effort to bring him over. I am shocked that Prucha has climbed so high. To me this is a clear example of rumors about a certain play carrying him high. No way should he have been listed ahead of any of Kondratiev, Liffiton, or Baranka. But that's another story.
I feel that Kondretiev, Liffiton, & Baranka are all too close to seperate. One is no better prospect than the next. If 'Drats went, then Liffiton & Baranka should follow.

Please add Liffiton to the selections.

True Blue is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:14 PM
  #8
Davisian
Registered User
 
Davisian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 6,079
vCash: 500
Party On Garth..

Davisian is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:15 PM
  #9
Rangers_23
Beuke!
 
Rangers_23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Land of Entrapment
Country: United States
Posts: 2,194
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Rangers_23 Send a message via MSN to Rangers_23
Ivan the Terrible gets my vote. Just edging out Immonen in my mind.

Rangers_23 is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:19 PM
  #10
Larry Melnyk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gloomsville, USA
Posts: 4,376
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by True Blue
Agreed. Umberber is not joining the Rangers, so then there is really no point in pontificating about where to place him within our prospect pool.
The next 2 have got to be Liffiton & Baranka. Have to be ahead of Immonen since it does not even sound like there have been much effort to bring him over. I am shocked that Prucha has climbed so high. To me this is a clear example of rumors about a certain play carrying him high. No way should he have been listed ahead of any of Kondratiev, Liffiton, or Baranka. But that's another story.
I feel that Kondretiev, Liffiton, & Baranka are all too close to seperate. One is no better prospect than the next. If 'Drats went, then Liffiton & Baranka should follow.

Please add Liffiton to the selections.
Just curious, why do Lifiton and Baranke have to be ahead of Immonen? Nothing wrong with developing in the Fin league compared to Juniors/AHL...And again, closeness to the NHL is only part of the equation...I like what I hear about Lifiton and Baranka, just like what the scouts and viewers of Immonen say more...Hell, all three may be booms or busts....

As for Prucha, they didn't really seem to be rumores..He made the World team for Czech..I think one of only two youngsters that made it....He got alot of playing time and, I think, was on the #1 PP for quite awhile...Kinda impressive...

Larry Melnyk is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:22 PM
  #11
ECL
Very slippery slope
 
ECL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middle America
Country: United States
Posts: 79,930
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ECL
Immonen. Easily. He's really impressed me in the last few days since I've read more and more about him and watched some clips.

ECL is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:23 PM
  #12
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,473
vCash: 500
I was about to ask the same thing, Larry....

no matter what the efforts are to bring over a guy, the poll is based on a player's future in the NHL, which may start next season, the season after, etc., not necessarily right away.

I did vote for Baranka though. Not sure he has the upside of a couple other guys that are listed (like a Dawes or maybe even a Jarkko), but I think he may be a safer, yet solid pick.

Fletch is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:24 PM
  #13
ECL
Very slippery slope
 
ECL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middle America
Country: United States
Posts: 79,930
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ECL
By the way. We need to add a feature where we vote on who gets added in next. I say we place our votes. Then in our reply we put in who we want added in next.

I say:

Liffiton next.

ECL is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:53 PM
  #14
kazo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 959
vCash: 500
I'd like to know how Thomas Pock could be rated ahead of Garth Murray.

kazo is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 02:55 PM
  #15
Davisian
Registered User
 
Davisian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 6,079
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kazo
I'd like to know how Thomas Pock could be rated ahead of Garth Murray.
Speed and skill is what did it for me..

Davisian is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 03:26 PM
  #16
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,647
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch
I did vote for Baranka though. Not sure he has the upside of a couple other guys that are listed (like a Dawes or maybe even a Jarkko), but I think he may be a safer, yet solid pick.
I think that Baranka's upside is not much lower than Tyutin's. From the moment he was drafter, a lot or scouting reports that I've read seem to have Ivan's game as very similar to Tyutin's, just more physical. Actually that's not accurate. It's not that he is more physical, it's that he seems to seek out the physical play, whereas Tyutin just seems to let it come to him, if it must.
Even the Fins who come on this board list Immonen as a possible 2nd line player, but more than likely a 3rd line center. Baranka projects as a 2nd l pair d-man. Liffiton projects out as a 3rd pair d-man. If anything, Jarkko could be compared to him in terms of ceiling.

True Blue is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 03:33 PM
  #17
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,473
vCash: 500
Comparing Pock and Murray is interesting...

Pock seems like he can play in the NHL, just right now, I'm not sure if he's going to be top 6 material. Murray seems like he can play in the NHL too, but right now his production dictates something along the lines of a fourth liner, maybe third (although he seems to be more skilled than I personally thought and as he gains experience, perhaps he'll start burying chances). But in Murray you have a potential captain, a physical presence and a guy who's going to stick up for teammates. I think I'd actually rank him hire than Pock, but I probably wouldn't rank him in the top 10.

Fletch is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 04:07 PM
  #18
Kubera55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 323
vCash: 500
Baranka, again, for like four picks now. I'm really surprised Baranka didn't finish ahead of Pock and Kondraitev. He's younger than either, bigger and tougher than either, and has a better draft pedigree than either. Frankly, with Tjutin graduating to the NHL level, I pretty much assumed Baranka was the next defenseman. I'd put Pock, Kondraitev, and Liffiton in a second tier with Lampman, Guenin, Taylor, and Potter occupying a third tier . . . but again, democracy rules.

As for Murray . . . I like him. But he's shown next to zero offensive production. Right now he's looking a lot more like the next Dan Lacouture than the next Darren McCarty.

Kubera55 is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 06:06 PM
  #19
Barnaby
Registered User
 
Barnaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Jefferson, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 4,624
vCash: 500
Jarkko Immonen - hands down IMO.

Had he been taken a couple of picks ago it would have been logical.

Barnaby is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 06:21 PM
  #20
bmoak
Registered User
 
bmoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,636
vCash: 500
This is the closest one we've had in a while, so I'll keep it going and not post the new one until late tonight.

I'm going to pull Umberger. If people aren't voting for him because they don't see him as Rangers property, it will skew the poll and his position on it. Next round, I pull him and replace him with David Liffiton.

bmoak is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 07:56 PM
  #21
majicpixie
Registered User
 
majicpixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The Tardis
Country: United States
Posts: 1,571
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to majicpixie Send a message via AIM to majicpixie Send a message via MSN to majicpixie
I voted for Moore. I was going to mention adding Chad to the list, but I didn't because he's a free agent on July 1 and may/may not be with the Rangers next year (I'd be surprised if Sather offered him a contract). Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember seeing Ortmeyer on these polls yet. I think he should be, and LaBarbera, as well.

majicpixie is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 08:04 PM
  #22
bmoak
Registered User
 
bmoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,636
vCash: 500
Ortmeyer just finished his rookie season in the NHL and can't be consdiered a prospect.
LaBarbera has completed 4 ECHL/AHL seasons and can't be considered a prospect
Marek has played more than 225 games in the Czech ExtraLiga and can't be consdiered a prospect.

bmoak is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 09:20 PM
  #23
bmoak
Registered User
 
bmoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,636
vCash: 500
Aargh! It's too close to declare a winner and move on to the next round!

bmoak is offline  
Old
05-10-2004, 09:29 PM
  #24
Barnaby
Registered User
 
Barnaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Port Jefferson, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 4,624
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by True Blue
The next 2 have got to be Liffiton & Baranka. Have to be ahead of Immonen since it does not even sound like there have been much effort to bring him over. I am shocked that Prucha has climbed so high. To me this is a clear example of rumors about a certain play carrying him high. No way should he have been listed ahead of any of Kondratiev, Liffiton, or Baranka. But that's another story.
I feel that Kondretiev, Liffiton, & Baranka are all too close to seperate. One is no better prospect than the next. If 'Drats went, then Liffiton & Baranka should follow.

Please add Liffiton to the selections.
1. Why must the next two be Liffiton, and Baranka? Immonen has been lighting up the Finnish league - just ask Padawan how he looks. Immonen is a blackhorse. He could easily be a 2nd line center from everything I've heard. As for bringing him over - what makes you say the Rangers haven't talked to him yet? All I've seen is one interview about a month ago that said he hadn't had that much contact with the Rangers. They didn't go out of there way to get this guy so he could rot in Finland.

2. I don't see Prucha being a rumor. The guy has been playing very well on a Czech team against seasoned NHL caliber talent. If you want to talk about rumors pushing a player, then how about Baranka? A month ago he was a solid defensive prospect. We read a good interview from him, and a positive article or two, and all of a sudden he's Tyutin 2. I don't see how he doesn't rank below Kondratiev. Kondratiev has proven he is fairly ready to play in the NHL. Baranka may be just as good or better one day, but he has one solid year under his belt. He hasn't had the time to prove himself. If I'm not mistaken he was a 2nd pairing defenseman on a mediocre team. Let's see him show steady improvement for a year or two before we jump to conclusions. I'm not saying Kondratiev is better because he is NHL ready - just that Baranka hasn't solidified himself yet.

Barnaby is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 08:25 AM
  #25
True Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,647
vCash: 500
"just ask Padawan how he looks. Immonen is a blackhorse. He could easily be a 2nd line center from everything I've heard."

You mean the sake Padawan who said that Jarkko could just as easily be a 3rd line player?


"If you want to talk about rumors pushing a player, then how about Baranka? A month ago he was a solid defensive prospect. We read a good interview from him, and a positive article or two, and all of a sudden he's Tyutin 2. "

Actually, ever since he was drafted, I've liked him. I have also seen a lot of scouting reports that make his game very similar to Tyutin's, except that he is more physical. Nothing to do with any interview. I just see him as a better prospect than Immonen.

True Blue is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.