HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Ottawa Senators
Notices

Official Trade Rumors and Proposals Thread- Trade Deadline Edition

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-08-2010, 03:34 AM
  #76
Pietraneglo222
WwWwW
 
Pietraneglo222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Gatineau
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,272
vCash: 500
they're both 30 years old :|

Pietraneglo222 is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 03:45 AM
  #77
senswon
Registered User
 
senswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vandrizzle
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,095
vCash: 500
For some reason I see them still as young players....and are both having ***** seasons......not the worst time to have to re-sign them and gives them incentive to get going before seasons end with a new start no?

Hell it could be pending Murray can get them both with contracts prior to the trade.Totally plausible, and with Cheech's salary off the books it's probably cap doable.

Much rather have these guys than Andrew Brunnette for some reason....If Liles and Svatos return to form we can look forward to some time (4-5 years) for the team to develop some flashy forward draft picks (Etem *cough*Petersson*cough*)


Last edited by senswon: 02-08-2010 at 03:53 AM.
senswon is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 04:32 AM
  #78
The Swedish Flash
Registered User
 
The Swedish Flash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rou.
Country: Romania
Posts: 3,673
vCash: 500
If Wallin can return a 2nd I would like to see what type of return could Volchenkov fetch.

You don't want any part of Liles and Svatos. Liles has a 4,2 mil contract for the next 2 years and he was a healthy scratch recently. People cringe about Kuba who is actually a decent d-man making 3,7 , this board would explode to see the mistake prone Liles on the Sens blueline. Think Joe Corvo with a bigger salary , yikes
Svatos is useless if he doesn't score,not a good defensive forward,under-sized to be on the 4th line, too one dimensional for Murray. He will look hard into the Nolan, Torres type of players at the deadline IMO

The Swedish Flash is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 04:52 AM
  #79
senswon
Registered User
 
senswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vandrizzle
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,095
vCash: 500
it's not like both Svatos and Liles have had one good season....they actually both had pretty great multiple seasons and are mired in a tough season......if I was a betting man, which I'm normally not, I would take a chance they both need a change of scenery and losing Chechoo's contract in the process as well as everyone's fav whipping boy Lee, plus Picard Pylon would be sweet any way you slice it.

senswon is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 05:05 AM
  #80
The Swedish Flash
Registered User
 
The Swedish Flash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rou.
Country: Romania
Posts: 3,673
vCash: 500
I'm just not very convinced that Murray would be keen to add two 5'10 , one-dimensional players to the roster before the playoffs.

The Swedish Flash is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 07:21 AM
  #81
Cherith Cutestory
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmonton/Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 590
vCash: 500
The more I think about this, the more i realize that we are not very likely to be active at the deadline.

What do we have to offer?
Our 2nd
SJ 2nd

That's kind of it...

We can't afford to trade prospects since Murray has just finished getting our prospect pool a little deeper (one thing I will give him credit for), we don't want to trade our 1st for a rental, and the roster players we have are 'good' because they fit into our system of play (Shannon, Winchester). Kuba has a NTC and who's to say he'd waive it, not to mention that he hasn't played great for the money he's making. Cheechoo has little-zero value to any other organization.

I thought maybe packaging Cheechoo with a 2nd (either ours or SJ's) would be enticing to other teams but that doesnt seem to be enough for a team to take on $3mil. in cap space for next year without us taking back an equally bad contract.

From this, it does not seem like we have much to offer to any other team in exchange for impact players.

Just my thought.

Cherith Cutestory is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 07:33 AM
  #82
DJB
Sens #1 F Prospect
 
DJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,549
vCash: 10215
It doesn't matter if Murray has interest in Liles and Svatos. UNless Colorado falls hard out of the playoffs, I doubt they move them.

Either way I'll pass on both...

DJB is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 08:01 AM
  #83
jbeck5
Registered User
 
jbeck5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,728
vCash: 500
I could see us making a small deal to acquire a fast,hard hitting, tenacious forechecker for very cheap. An upcoming UFA for a 5th or 6th rounder that will play on our bottom 2 lines. The only way this happens is if a seller gets desperate to deal UFA's and we make a saprykin type deal.

jbeck5 is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 08:20 AM
  #84
stempniaksen
Alright, I'm mad
 
stempniaksen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,138
vCash: 1735
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbeck5 View Post
I could see us making a small deal to acquire a fast,hard hitting, tenacious forechecker for very cheap. An upcoming UFA for a 5th or 6th rounder that will play on our bottom 2 lines. The only way this happens is if a seller gets desperate to deal UFA's and we make a saprykin type deal.
Only difference is we gave up a 2nd for Saprykin, not a 5th or 6th.

I wouldn't mind giving up a 2nd if it brought in a veteran with some experience (who fits the criteria you said i.e forechecker, ect) but if we give up a 2nd for a 4th liner I'll lose my mind.

stempniaksen is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 08:28 AM
  #85
jbeck5
Registered User
 
jbeck5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,728
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stempniaksen View Post
Only difference is we gave up a 2nd for Saprykin, not a 5th or 6th.

I wouldn't mind giving up a 2nd if it brought in a veteran with some experience (who fits the criteria you said i.e forechecker, ect) but if we give up a 2nd for a 4th liner I'll lose my mind.
Really? Who the heck was i thinking about then?...Anyways, scratch the saprykin part...just a solid veteran that a seller is desperate to get picks for. I don't put much stock into 4th round picks and up, so i wouldn't mind giving up a 4th rounder for a 20-30 point speedy/physical(3rd or 4th liner) upcoming ufa if we can get something done.

jbeck5 is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 08:36 AM
  #86
guyzeur
Registered User
 
guyzeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,355
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sensational Spezza View Post
True, one of Murray's worst decisions as a GM

I'm sure teams like Detroit, Pittsburgh and Carolina are facepalming right now as well
If he get Staal, history would have been different; we probably would have never been able to draft EK

guyzeur is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 09:42 AM
  #87
SERGEI BOBROVTREE
I'm a pretty big fan
 
SERGEI BOBROVTREE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Country: England
Posts: 5,189
vCash: 135
Chirpy got me excited when I read "David Perron". Make it happen!

SERGEI BOBROVTREE is online now  
Old
02-08-2010, 10:05 AM
  #88
trentmccleary
Registered User
 
trentmccleary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alfie-Ville
Posts: 18,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by cherith cutestory View Post
The more I think about this, the more i realize that we are not very likely to be active at the deadline.

What do we have to offer?
Our 2nd
SJ 2nd

That's kind of it...

We can't afford to trade prospects since Murray has just finished getting our prospect pool a little deeper (one thing I will give him credit for),
So we have valuable assets to trade... the real question is whether we need anything enough to trade them?

Goalies - Murray's invested a fair bit into keeping them for the year and a half. We aren't getting a new goalie.

Defense - Karlsson's becoming what we've needed on defense. Otherwise, we have a pretty good mix at unbelievably cost effective cap hits.

Forwards - we have size, we have scoring, we have defense... we better have all of those things, because our forward crew makes a lot of money.
Scoring: I've seen people begging for another scorer, why? Alfie, Spezza, Kovalev, Fisher & Michalek are providing more scoring depth than we ever have going into the postseason. Foligno would be the player most would like to improve upon and Regin is a luxury that we usually don't have... both are building blocks that have been hot lately and provide enough scoring to be 6/7 offensive forwards.

Realistically, we could improve in goal, #1 D-man and Top-6 forward... but in all cases, we'd be setting youngsters back who've been getting the job done.

trentmccleary is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 10:17 AM
  #89
Slippy
Registered User
 
Slippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,484
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by senswon View Post
it's not like both Svatos and Liles have had one good season....they actually both had pretty great multiple seasons and are mired in a tough season......if I was a betting man, which I'm normally not, I would take a chance they both need a change of scenery and losing Chechoo's contract in the process as well as everyone's fav whipping boy Lee, plus Picard Pylon would be sweet any way you slice it.
Except when you slice it so so you see you're picking up an underachieving defenceman that is at a higher cap hit for a longer term than Cheechoo. Might as well just buyout Cheechoo and give the money you figure we could pay Liles and give it to Volchenkov.

Slippy is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 10:31 AM
  #90
SpezDispenser
Registered User
 
SpezDispenser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,809
vCash: 500
Please...can we get A-Train wrapped up soon? I know the benefits of trading him, but I also know the benefits of keeping him. So I'll choose keeping him. C'mon Murray, get it done!

SpezDispenser is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 10:32 AM
  #91
TheBandWagon
Registered User
 
TheBandWagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: right here
Country: Canada
Posts: 953
vCash: 500
I personally really wanna see what Cheech can do for us in the playoffs. Anything I've heard from my friends that are sharks fans say he's pretty clutch in the postseason.

I like the idea that the guy has the potential to be a legit threat on the 3rd and 4th line that could wind up scoring us some clutch goals

Realistically, the only thing I'd want to see Murray move would be later round draft picks for a D man that can come in if someone is injured/keep picard in the pressbox. If he's signed for a couple years great, if he's an impending UFA it could give Murray a bit of leverage with the volchenkov signing which might get him inked to a lower contract, but thats just my theory.

TheBandWagon is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 10:38 AM
  #92
stempniaksen
Alright, I'm mad
 
stempniaksen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,138
vCash: 1735
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbeck5 View Post
Really? Who the heck was i thinking about then?...Anyways, scratch the saprykin part...just a solid veteran that a seller is desperate to get picks for. I don't put much stock into 4th round picks and up, so i wouldn't mind giving up a 4th rounder for a 20-30 point speedy/physical(3rd or 4th liner) upcoming ufa if we can get something done.
Probably Martin Lapointe. We gave up a 6th rounder for him (which turned out to be Ben Smith, fwiw).

stempniaksen is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 10:49 AM
  #93
wilfred
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Bunswick
Posts: 1,235
vCash: 500
I would like to see volchenkov resigned in the next could of weeks for 3.7 or under if that does not happen I'd like to see us only trade him for a massive overpayment

wilfred is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 10:56 AM
  #94
jbeck5
Registered User
 
jbeck5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,728
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stempniaksen View Post
Probably Martin Lapointe. We gave up a 6th rounder for him (which turned out to be Ben Smith, fwiw).
Yeah, probably.

jbeck5 is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 11:01 AM
  #95
The Mars Volchenkov
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 32,480
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to The Mars Volchenkov
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeJong View Post
It doesn't matter if Murray has interest in Liles and Svatos. UNless Colorado falls hard out of the playoffs, I doubt they move them.

Either way I'll pass on both...
Svatos barely plays a role on the Avs. Liles has been a healthy scratch many times this year. They'd be fine unloading both.

The Mars Volchenkov is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 11:05 AM
  #96
Juice*
 
Juice*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,944
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mars Volchenkov View Post
Svatos barely plays a role on the Avs. Liles has been a healthy scratch many times this year. They'd be fine unloading both.
I think you're right on that.

Juice* is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 11:14 AM
  #97
Zillaege
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 843
vCash: 500
As much as Karlsson has impressed over the past month, I'm nervous about going into the playoffs with a 19 year old, undersized rookie as our primary puck mover. In a 7 game series teams will really key on him and i'm not sure he's ready yet for that role. I really want the Sens to look at Visnovsky, he'd be a massive improvement over Kuba on the #1 power play unit, and he could help mentor and shelter Karlsson for the next few years, rather than thrusting him into a pivotal role. If Edmonton was willing to eat a salary like Cheechoo's, I'd be willing to add significant picks/prospects to make the deal work, then move Kuba in the offseason. A defence of:

Phillips - Volchenkov
Kuba - Karlsson
Visnovsky - Carkner

is pretty damn good.

Zillaege is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 11:23 AM
  #98
inthewings
Registered User
 
inthewings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,903
vCash: 500
Why bring Liles in and ruin our chances of keeping Volchenkov/ adding Michalek next year?

inthewings is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 11:27 AM
  #99
wilfred
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Bunswick
Posts: 1,235
vCash: 500
What young talented goal (who signed to a good contract or is a rfa that could help us this year) scorer could we get for

2010 1st
2010 2nd
cheechoo
winchester?

I know we don't trade our 1st rounders but I think it would be fun to talk about

Sam Gagner
veersteeg
sharp
wolski
Setoguchi

wilfred is offline  
Old
02-08-2010, 11:55 AM
  #100
senswon
Registered User
 
senswon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vandrizzle
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,095
vCash: 500
Quote:
Why bring Liles in and ruin our chances of keeping Volchenkov/ adding Michalek next year?
trading Kuba for a 3rd and 4th at the draft would make it possible to re-sign A-train and open a spot for Cowen to make the team

Phillips-Volch
Karlsson-Carkner
Liles-Cowen
Campoli

Looks pretty good to me :-)

Then trade 2x 3rd rounders and a 4th for another 2nd
Then trade 2x 2nd rounders and kelly for a 10-20spot 1st rounder
leaves us with 3 players in the top 60...while opening up a roster spot for Cowen which Murray has said he thinks will make the team AND we can re-sign Volch

15.Emerson Etem
Centre - Medicine Hat (WHL)
Born: 06/16/92
Hometown: Long Beach, CA
6-0, 194 lbs.
Stats (Through Jan. 24): 32 G, 21 A, 53 PTS, 14 PIM

"speed and hands and size....potential 2nd line centre Ottawa has been searching for.....like Cheechoo when he was still a 50 goal scorer"
Etem has been one of the biggest surprises this year, taking the WHL by storm after flying under the radar a year ago with the NTDP U17 team. One of the first things you’ll notice about Etem is his skating stride, which is one of the most awkward and unique strides out there, especially for a player of his caliber. Putting that aside, he’s one of the top snipers available in this draft. Etem loves to shoot from anywhere and has the ability to pick corners all over the offensive zone. If he continues his torrid goal scoring pace, he could climb up into the mid teens, but concerns about his overall game and skating will likely prevent him from reaching the top half of the first round.


22.Jeff Skinner
Centre - Kitchener (OHL)
Born: 05/16/92
Hometown: Markham, ON
5-10, 197 lbs.
Stats (Through Jan. 24): 36 G, 28 A, 64 PTS, 48 PIM

"sniper that's built like a firehydrant, added significant weight since starting the season. Very few would have been able to predict that Jeff Skinner would be the OHL leader in goals in January at the start of the season, but that is the case right now. Skinner has taken off this season with the resurgent Kitchener Rangers, establishing himself as one of the most potent snipers in the Canadian Hockey League. Skinner’s ability to lurk in the offensive zone and jump on opportunities will surely be enough for a team to take him in Round 1, but there will be some concerns over his transition to the pros. Skinner’s skating still needs some refinement, especially given his stature."

wishful thinking I guess.....now where'd I put my xbox controller...


Last edited by senswon: 02-08-2010 at 12:03 PM.
senswon is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.