Canada's wins at both the 2002 Olympics and 2010 had so many similarities, it is almost eerie. Both teams started out slow, had people start to doubt them, before they got increasingly stronger every game and eventually won the Gold Medal.
i thought your 2010 team was better honestly. the 2002 names look more impressive, but that was also an older team with more credentials. the 2002 team dodged a huge bullet by not having to play sweden, who spanked them really badly earlier in the tournament.
Luongo wasn't bad, but I never felt he was great either. Some shakey moments and some real good saves, but at times he didn't look all that comfortable in the crease. The goaltending for Canada in 2002 could flat out win games, a quality Luongo never showed in this tournament(even if he has shown it in the past).
On the other hand, the 2010 team has a great combination of youth, size, and speed that might make the difference against an older 2002 team.