HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Buffalo proposal for Ovechkin

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
05-02-2004, 02:41 PM
  #101
SabresRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,314
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to SabresRule
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
Right.

That's how GM's think.

Let's trade our 34 year old All-Star with a big contract so we can sign a 36 year old All-Star with an even bigger contract.
you cannot even begin to say that. unless your saying only a GM would think that.

if you truly mean that, your just stupid. Hasek is twice the goalie Cujo is.

SabresRule is offline  
Old
05-02-2004, 02:42 PM
  #102
leafaholix*
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ron Hainsey is King!
Country: Botswana
Posts: 22,934
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SabresRule
you cannot even begin to say that. unless your saying only a GM would think that.

if you truly mean that, your just stupid. Hasek is twice the goalie Cujo is.
Why would the Leafs sign a $10,000,000 goalie when they already had one of the top 5?

leafaholix* is offline  
Old
05-02-2004, 02:44 PM
  #103
TVanek26*
 
TVanek26*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Buffalo,New York
Country: United States
Posts: 8,583
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to TVanek26*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
Why would the Leafs sign a $10,000,000 goalie when they already had one of the top 5?

But CuJo wasn't a top 5...a top 5 leads their team deep in the playoffs.

TVanek26* is offline  
Old
05-02-2004, 02:44 PM
  #104
SabresRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,314
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to SabresRule
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
Why would the Leafs sign a $10,000,000 goalie when they already had one of the top 5?
Cause Hasek could get them a cup, Cujo wouldnt.

SabresRule is offline  
Old
05-02-2004, 02:57 PM
  #105
Giggiewithit35
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Buffalo,New York
Posts: 29
vCash: 500
Just remember, at one point, Manny Legace was the starting goalie in Detroit until his bad performance. Cujo just greatly decreased after leaving Toronto. Luckily, Detroit has a high payroll and they didnt waste that much money on a goalie who cannot help their team win a cup.

Giggiewithit35 is offline  
Old
05-03-2004, 12:21 PM
  #106
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,649
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
The Maple Leafs had Curtis Joseph when Hasek was an UFA.
So? Hasek is the best goalie ever. Joseph is an average goaltender. Note several things:

1. Buffalo does have the ability to sign and keep highly priced UFA. In fact, the best UFA over the past 10 years was Hasek, and Buffalo was able to sign him. This is contrary to your suggestion.

2. Toronto was not able to sign such an elite player, possibly because he was too young.

3. The Detroit Red Wings had Curtis Joseph when Hasek would have been a UFA if they didn't exercise his option.

4. Curtis Joseph is not a great goalie. Review Sanderson's one handed goal against Joseph in the 1999 Eastern Conference Finals for proof.

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
05-03-2004, 12:23 PM
  #107
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,649
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
Right.

That's how GM's think.

Let's trade our 34 year old All-Star with a big contract so we can sign a 36 year old All-Star with an even bigger contract.
How about trading or waiving the 37 year old with a bigger contract in order to exercise an option on a 39 year old Hall of Famer?

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
05-03-2004, 12:52 PM
  #108
SabresRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,314
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to SabresRule
Quote:
Originally Posted by LALALALALALAFONTAINE
So? Hasek is the best goalie ever. Joseph is an average goaltender. Note several things:

1. Buffalo does have the ability to sign and keep highly priced UFA. In fact, the best UFA over the past 10 years was Hasek, and Buffalo was able to sign him. This is contrary to your suggestion.

2. Toronto was not able to sign such an elite player, possibly because he was too young.

3. The Detroit Red Wings had Curtis Joseph when Hasek would have been a UFA if they didn't exercise his option.

4. Curtis Joseph is not a great goalie. Review Sanderson's one handed goal against Joseph in the 1999 Eastern Conference Finals for proof.
This may stun you - i totally agree.

SabresRule is offline  
Old
05-03-2004, 08:09 PM
  #109
leafaholix*
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ron Hainsey is King!
Country: Botswana
Posts: 22,934
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LALALALALALAFONTAINE
So? Hasek is the best goalie ever. Joseph is an average goaltender. Note several things:
Patrick Roy is the greatest goalie of all-time.

Quote:
1. Buffalo does have the ability to sign and keep highly priced UFA. In fact, the best UFA over the past 10 years was Hasek, and Buffalo was able to sign him. This is contrary to your suggestion.
They resigned him... I'm talking about bringing in a star... not keeping one.

Quote:
2. Toronto was not able to sign such an elite player, possibly because he was too young.
Wow, nice.

Quote:
4. Curtis Joseph is not a great goalie.
He actually is a great goalie... is he a hall-of-famer? No.

Quote:
Review Sanderson's one handed goal against Joseph in the 1999 Eastern Conference Finals for proof.
A couple things...

a) I don't remember the goal... it's been 5 years.
b) One bad goal means nothing... Patrick Roy even gave up bad goals... and he's the greatest ever.

leafaholix* is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 12:18 AM
  #110
Dr_Gonz0
Registered User
 
Dr_Gonz0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,228
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LALALALALALAFONTAINE
I can understand that. I was wondering whether I'd be able to turn a deal without giving up Vanek, Roy or Kalinin.
Hmmm, Vanek, Roy and Kalinin. That sounds about right for Ovechkin ... , or drop one of those players and add your 1st from this year perhaps.

Dr_Gonz0 is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 11:56 AM
  #111
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,649
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
Patrick Roy is the greatest goalie of all-time.
How so? Because he played on better teams? Does this mean Madden is better than Sundin?

Hasek has more Hart Trophies than Roy and more Vezinas than Roy even though Roy's career was longer. Hasek did far more in about half the time.

As far as playoff wins go, seems like Colorado is doing better with Aebischer than they did with Roy last year, or the year before that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
They resigned him... I'm talking about bringing in a star... not keeping one.
He was an UFA, and the best UFA available. Any team could have signed him. Where did he go?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
He actually is a great goalie... is he a hall-of-famer? No.
How many Vezinas does he have? The same number of Cups the _ueefs have since 1967. Note that Detroit hasn't done anything since Hasek left.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
a) I don't remember the goal... it's been 5 years.
b) One bad goal means nothing... Patrick Roy even gave up bad goals... and he's the greatest ever.
I can't help you with repressed memories.

Just because you say Roy is the greatest ever doesn't mean it's true. Vezinas are awarded to the best goalie. When Hasek was a starter, Roy won ZERO Vezinas. Why do you think that is?

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 12:50 PM
  #112
txpd
Registered User
 
txpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 37,113
vCash: 500
I think this thread has run its course. one mention of ovechkin on the last page.
next?

txpd is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 01:56 PM
  #113
leafaholix*
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ron Hainsey is King!
Country: Botswana
Posts: 22,934
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Just because you say Roy is the greatest ever doesn't mean it's true. Vezinas are awarded to the best goalie. When Hasek was a starter, Roy won ZERO Vezinas. Why do you think that is?
It comes down to who was the greatest ever... and it's clear that Roy was the greatest of all time.

If Hasek had played as much as Roy, then he probably would have been the greatest ever... but he didn't.

leafaholix* is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 01:58 PM
  #114
leafaholix*
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ron Hainsey is King!
Country: Botswana
Posts: 22,934
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LALALALALALAFONTAINE
How so? Because he played on better teams? Does this mean Madden is better than Sundin?
How is that even a similar comparison?

Sundin is one of the greatest European's ever... a hall-of-famer.

John Madden is a checker... he has 163 points at the age of 31.

leafaholix* is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 05:09 PM
  #115
Weezel RX7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bristol CT
Posts: 1,136
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Weezel RX7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
How is that even a similar comparison?

Sundin is one of the greatest European's ever... a hall-of-famer.

John Madden is a checker... he has 163 points at the age of 31.
1. Back to the trade, i wouldnt do that from a sabres POV

2. Hasek is better than Roy

3. You won't compare 2 forwards of different styles, but u can compare 2 goalies of different styles? Hasek is a much better goaltender than Roy, hands down. Roy had a premium defense in front of him in Colorado. Hasek has an above average D in front of him in '99

Weezel RX7 is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 05:31 PM
  #116
SwOOsh*
 
SwOOsh*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,271
vCash: 500
Sorry to interupt but I for one have to say that Patrick Roy is the best goalie of all time (or his era I guess, as I didn't see any of Sawchuk, Plante etc.). He may have not had the best stats, etc. but he sure knew how to win and did it when it counted.

Also I'm not even a Roy supporter, I actually despise him as a person, but as a hockey player he was remarkeable.

SwOOsh* is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 07:32 PM
  #117
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,649
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
How is that even a similar comparison?

Sundin is one of the greatest European's ever... a hall-of-famer.

John Madden is a checker... he has 163 points at the age of 31.
But Madden has three Cups. That's the ONLY argument you have with Roy vs. Hasek. And it's a bad one.

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 08:18 PM
  #118
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,649
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwOOsh
Sorry to interupt but I for one have to say that Patrick Roy is the best goalie of all time (or his era I guess, as I didn't see any of Sawchuk, Plante etc.). He may have not had the best stats, etc. but he sure knew how to win and did it when it counted.

Also I'm not even a Roy supporter, I actually despise him as a person, but as a hockey player he was remarkeable.
Did it count against Minnesota? Colorado had 105 points, Minnesota had 95. (Losing to a lesser team in the playoffs #1)

Did it count against Hasek (against whom Roy has never beaten when it has counted) and the Red Wings? You will recall the Statue of Liberty goal that cost the Avs game six and his sieve like status in game 7. Colorado had 99 points, Detroit had 116 points.

Did it count against D*ll*s in 1999 or 2000? D*ll*s had 102 points, Colorado had 96 points in 2000. D*ll*s had 114 points and Colorado had 98 points in 1999.

Did it count against the below-.500 Oilers in 1998? Colorado had 95 points, Edmonton had but 80. (Losing to a lesser team in the playoffs #2)

Did it count against the Red Wings in 1997? Colorado had 107 points, while Detroit had 94. (Losing to a lesser team in the playoffs #3). Colorado had the best regular season record in the league.

Did it count against the Bruins in 1994? Boston had 97 points, Montreal had 96 points.

Did it count against the Bruins in 1992? Montreal had 93 points, Boston had 84 points. (Losing to a lesser team in the playoffs #4)

Did it count against the Bruins in 1991, when Roy was replaced by Red Light Racicot twice? Bruins had 100 points, Montreal had 89 points.

Did it count against the Bruins in 1990? Boston had 101 points, Montreal had 93.

Did it count against the Flames in 1989? Calgary had 117 points, Montreal had 115.

Did it count against the Bruins in 1988? Montreal had 103 points, Boston had 94. (Losing to a lesser team in the playoffs #5) Maybe that's why Brian Hayward got 3 starts, and an additional game in relief.

Did it count against the matter against the Flyers in 1987? Philly had 100 points, Montreal had 92. Brian Hayward played in 13 games in the playoffs, while Roy got in 6, despite the fact Roy played more games in the regular season.

Your argument will be that Roy has 4 Cup rings. Big deal. Let's look at those years:
1986: Montreal (87 points) beats Boston (86), Hartford (84), NY Rangers (78) and Calgary (89). That's the result of a remarkably easy path to the Cup. Nobody had more than 90 points! Thank Steve Smith for scoring on his own net, preventing the Oilers from getting to the Cup, not Patrick Roy.

1993: Montreal (102 points) beats Quebec (103), Buffalo (86), NYI (87) and LA (88). Note also that Buffalo was without Lafontaine, and that Roy was on the bench during the turning point of the Stanley Cup final, when Montreal pulled Roy when McSorley got his penalty. Also note that Roy absolutely sucked against Quebec, prompting Red Light to enter the game.

1996: Colorado (104 points) beats Vancouver (79), Chicago (94), Detroit (131) and Florida (92). Colorado beat everybody they were supposed to, and they upset Detroit. Who was responsible for that? Chris Osgood, and his charitable nature.

2001: Colorado was the best team in the league. They should have won.

In other words, Roy was fortunate to play on teams who, for the most part, outclassed their opposition.

Hasek only lost once to a team with a lesser regular season record, against Pittsburgh in 2001. Of course, Lemieux only played half the regular season and Buffalo only had a 2 point advantage over Pittsburgh. Roy did it 5 times. Clutch? His double clutch giveaway against Red Wings in game six is a choke.

Roy played on the team with best regular season record twice. He won one Cup. Hasek played on the team with the best regular season once. He won the Cup.

Roy never won the Vezina or Hart as much as Hasek, despite playing much longer. Hasek was never replaced as a starter in the regular season, let alone playoffs (except for injury). Roy was replaced in the playoffs twice after becoming the starter.

Roy never won when it counted. He simply had enough chances. It is not unlike a fortune teller making lots of predictions, because the more of them you make, the greater the likelihood that something sticks.

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
05-04-2004, 08:19 PM
  #119
LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,649
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
It comes down to who was the greatest ever... and it's clear that Roy was the greatest of all time.

If Hasek had played as much as Roy, then he probably would have been the greatest ever... but he didn't.
Yet despite not playing as much as Roy, he has more awards indicating his superiority as a goaltender (Vezinas, Harts).

LALALALALALAFONTAINE is offline  
Old
05-05-2004, 08:33 AM
  #120
Jonathan.
Chairman Mao-rilyn
 
Jonathan.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Country: Bahamas
Posts: 57,397
vCash: 883
Send a message via AIM to Jonathan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafaholix
That's absolutely crazy.

I'm willing to bet that no NHL team would trade Ovechkin for that offer even if Satan came at no cost. It's a horrendous offer... Ovechkin has the potential to be the best player in the game and will most likely make the same impact as Kovalchuk did in his rookie season.

Skill wise, Ovechkin's as good as Kovalchuk... defensively he's much, much, much better and he actally will take the body.

I wouldn't even trade Malkin for Satan, Kalinin, and picks.
I wholeheartedly concur with this.

Jonathan. is offline  
Old
05-05-2004, 12:50 PM
  #121
SabresRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,314
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to SabresRule
Quote:
Originally Posted by LALALALALALAFONTAINE
Yet despite not playing as much as Roy, he has more awards indicating his superiority as a goaltender (Vezinas, Harts).
it's close between the two, but imho your right. Hasek is the greater goaltender.

SabresRule is offline  
Old
05-05-2004, 12:58 PM
  #122
BIGTRAIN*
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 361
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SabresRule
it's close between the two, but imho your right. Hasek is the greater goaltender.
WHAT ARE YOU SERIOUS ??? I hate Roy but he is for right now the best goalie of all time bar no one >>

BIGTRAIN* is offline  
Old
05-05-2004, 01:18 PM
  #123
SabresRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,314
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to SabresRule
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGTRAIN
WHAT ARE YOU SERIOUS ??? I hate Roy but he is for right now the best goalie of all time bar no one >>
YES I AM SERIOUS!

why are you speaking like john mcenroe (sp, i mean the tennis player with that saying)

SabresRule is offline  
Old
05-05-2004, 01:28 PM
  #124
BIGTRAIN*
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 361
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SabresRule
YES I AM SERIOUS!

why are you speaking like john mcenroe (sp, i mean the tennis player with that saying)
If you are serious what criteria are you using to make that determanation ?

BIGTRAIN* is offline  
Old
05-05-2004, 02:13 PM
  #125
Weezel RX7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bristol CT
Posts: 1,136
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Weezel RX7
look at the previous posts...

Weezel RX7 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.