HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Grachev

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
03-16-2010, 10:41 AM
  #1
chosen
Registered User
 
chosen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,020
vCash: 500
Grachev

Questions for those that see him regularly:

1. Statistically he is running far behind expectations and projections posted here before the season. How has he looked?

2. At a fairly similar point in his career, Anisimov tore up the AHL. Is Grachev now considered less of a prospect than Anisimov?

3. Is it possible that Grachev could end up the next Jessiman, or has he demonstrated more than Jessiman, to date?

I'm only interested in your opinions if you've seen him play a fair amount of games. Telling me he is young and that I should be patient is unimportant to me. I already know he's young. I just want to know what people who see him are currently thinking.

Thanks in advance for any meaningful input.

chosen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 10:46 AM
  #2
Levitate
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,699
vCash: 500
It's been talked to death in the Wolfpack thread, and no, Anisimov did not tear up the AHL at the same age

edit: here are the bests posts about him:

http://hfboards.com/showpost.php?p=2...&postcount=518

http://hfboards.com/showpost.php?p=2...&postcount=231


Last edited by Levitate: 03-16-2010 at 10:53 AM.
Levitate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 10:52 AM
  #3
hlundqvist30*
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,520
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Questions for those that see him regularly:

1. Statistically he is running far behind expectations and projections posted here before the season. How has he looked?

2. At a fairly similar point in his career, Anisimov tore up the AHL. Is Grachev now considered less of a prospect than Anisimov?

3. Is it possible that Grachev could end up the next Jessiman, or has he demonstrated more than Jessiman, to date?

I'm only interested in your opinions if you've seen him play a fair amount of games. Telling me he is young and that I should be patient is unimportant to me. I already know he's young. I just want to know what people who see him are currently thinking.

Thanks in advance for any meaningful input.
1. Don't really see how he is "far behind expecations" statistically. Only there are only 1 or 2 players in the AHL this year who both have more points than he does and also is the same age. No, he hasn't been on fire, but he's hardly been dreadful.

2. How is Grachev at a similar point in his career as Anisimov last year? Anisimov was in his second year in the AHL when he tore it up. In his first year he put up 44 points, roughly the same amount Grachev will end up with this year.

3. I don't really get the Jessiman comparison. Jessiman was a top 10 pick who completely fell apart. Grachev was a third rounder in his first year of professional hockey. If you're trying to ask if he can bust, of course, just like any prospect can. For all we know Taylor Hall may never play an NHL game. It's stupid to question Grachev's career after one decent AHL season as a 19 year old.

hlundqvist30* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 10:53 AM
  #4
Bleed Ranger Blue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16,467
vCash: 500
Grachev is old news. The shiny new toys (Kreider and Stepan) are now the toast of the town.

Bleed Ranger Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 10:54 AM
  #5
Carlos Ranger
Zucc-a-Rella
 
Carlos Ranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,239
vCash: 50
Anisimov played a season and change of pro hockey before the AHL. This is Grachev's first pro experience. Comparing them at the same age, of course Anisimov was a little better. This doesn't mean he's the next Jessiman, it just means people were setting their expectations way too high for Grachev this year.

Just look up other Russian stars first few years of pro hockey. Malkin, Ovechkin, almost anyone at age 18-19.. Not comparing them, but they all struggled at one point, and weren't superstars from the get-go.

Carlos Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 11:12 AM
  #6
ogie
Registered User
 
ogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Staten Island
Country: United States
Posts: 1,271
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shat Scar View Post
it just means people were setting their expectations way too high for Grachev this year.
people have been setting their expectations way too high for him since his first prospects camp. I love the people that list future lineups and its all prospects. The idea that some guys will just never make it is like greek to them. Some players no matter how good they were in juniors/college/abroad just cant hack it at the nhl level. Not saying that Grachev won't make it, but people seem to put way too much stock in prospects around this board.

ogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 11:21 AM
  #7
dtrap
Registered User
 
dtrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,720
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to dtrap
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleed Ranger Blue View Post
Grachev is old news. The shiny new toys (Kreider and Stepan) are now the toast of the town.
Until we make our first round pick this year

dtrap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:00 PM
  #8
msv957
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,057
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleed Ranger Blue View Post
Grachev is old news. The shiny new toys (Kreider and Stepan) are now the toast of the town.
Haha... so True.... last year at this time Grachev was the Shiny new toy... now it is Kreider and Stepan...

We all just need to sit back and just let these prospects develop... but that is a difficult thing to do as it is kind of fun just projecting what a prospect will be at the NHL level.....

Not sure what to think of Grachev... He is young.. but you don't want to hear that.. LOL He was drafted 2 years ago so has had (2) years to develop since his draft year which is important.... I think next year is a big year to see what Grachev has at AHL level.... Maybe there was a reason he was drafted in the third round as prospects such as Grachev take time to develop.

I do believe the honest fans would say Grachev has been somewhat of a disapointment this year playing at the AHL level based on what he demonstated at the WJC championship last year.

msv957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:03 PM
  #9
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by msv957 View Post
Haha... so True.... last year at this time Grachev was the Shiny new toy... now it is Kreider and Stepan...

We all just need to sit back and just let these prospects develop... but that is a difficult thing to do as it is kind of fun just projecting what a prospect will be at the NHL level.....

Not sure what to think of Grachev... He is young.. but you don't want to hear that.. LOL He was drafted 2 years ago so has had (2) years to develop since his draft year which is important.... I think next year is a big year to see what Grachev has at AHL level.... Maybe there was a reason he was drafted in the third round as prospects such as Grachev take time to develop.
He was drafted in the 3rd round because teams were afraid he wouldn't come over from Russia.

I'm not sure why anyone would be worried with Grachev. It was his first pro season and he was one of the youngest players in the AHL. Sure there is definitely an adjustment period for him from Juniors to the Pro level, but it's not like he is overwhelmed at the level.

Patience folks.

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:03 PM
  #10
Synergy27
Registered User
 
Synergy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Country: United States
Posts: 5,780
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Questions for those that see him regularly:

1. Statistically he is running far behind expectations and projections posted here before the season. How has he looked?

2. At a fairly similar point in his career, Anisimov tore up the AHL. Is Grachev now considered less of a prospect than Anisimov?

3. Is it possible that Grachev could end up the next Jessiman, or has he demonstrated more than Jessiman, to date?

I'm only interested in your opinions if you've seen him play a fair amount of games. Telling me he is young and that I should be patient is unimportant to me. I already know he's young. I just want to know what people who see him are currently thinking.

Thanks in advance for any meaningful input.
Seriously? The guy was a 3rd rounder, not a questionable #12 overall in one of the all-time greatest NHL drafts. If Grachev completely busts it would suck, but it won't set the franchise back years like the Jessiman pick did.

Synergy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:04 PM
  #11
msv957
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,057
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogie View Post
people have been setting their expectations way too high for him since his first prospects camp. I love the people that list future lineups and its all prospects. The idea that some guys will just never make it is like greek to them. Some players no matter how good they were in juniors/college/abroad just cant hack it at the nhl level. Not saying that Grachev won't make it, but people seem to put way too much stock in prospects around this board.
Agreed 100%... but it is fun to project a future lineup based on shiny pimple faced prospects!! LOL

msv957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:05 PM
  #12
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 29,974
vCash: 500
The team in Hartford has been horrible. To directly relate the teams Anisimov played on to this team this season is a mistake.

NYR Viper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:07 PM
  #13
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyviper87 View Post
The team in Hartford has been horrible. To directly relate the teams Anisimov played on to this team this season is a mistake.
Good point also. Anismov played on a team was was at the top of the conference each year, Grachev is playing on probably the worst Wolf Pack team in a decade.

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:09 PM
  #14
msv957
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,057
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synergy27 View Post
Seriously? The guy was a 3rd rounder, not a questionable #12 overall in one of the all-time greatest NHL drafts. If Grachev completely busts it would suck, but it won't set the franchise back years like the Jessiman pick did.
Man...that 2003 Draft was awesome... so many great players.. You could be right as it could be the best draft of all time

Both the Rangers (Jessiman) and Isles (Nilsson) first round picks busted and really set both teams back... but of course the Devils hit a home run with Parise...

msv957 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 12:44 PM
  #15
wa2k99
Registered User
 
wa2k99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: St. Charles IL
Posts: 1,249
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyviper87 View Post
The team in Hartford has been horrible. To directly relate the teams Anisimov played on to this team this season is a mistake.
HFD has been decimated by injuries. It's not all about lack of talent. Plus their goalies were changing every other day for three months!

wa2k99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 01:10 PM
  #16
Radek27
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,706
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Radek27
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogie View Post
people have been setting their expectations way too high for him since his first prospects camp. I love the people that list future lineups and its all prospects. The idea that some guys will just never make it is like greek to them. Some players no matter how good they were in juniors/college/abroad just cant hack it at the nhl level. Not saying that Grachev won't make it, but people seem to put way too much stock in prospects around this board.
I hate posts like that where all 6 of our D are propsects and we have like one veteran on the whole team in Gaborik. I just chalk those posts up to the kids missing thier NHL 10.

Radek27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 01:12 PM
  #17
Radek27
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 5,706
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Radek27
Quote:
Originally Posted by wa2k99 View Post
HFD has been decimated by injuries. It's not all about lack of talent. Plus their goalies were changing every other day for three months!
C'mon call up some guys from the ECHL if thats the case. The injury excuse never flew for me in any sport, nevermind at the minor league level.

Radek27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 01:29 PM
  #18
nyr2k2
Can't Beat Him
 
nyr2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 24,776
vCash: 50
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radek27 View Post
C'mon call up some guys from the ECHL if thats the case. The injury excuse never flew for me in any sport, nevermind at the minor league level.
The ECHL team doesn't have much to offer the AHL squad... Devin DiDiomete, David Urquhart, Mike Taylor...Matt Schepke maybe? Hillier is still injured and sucks anyway, and Zaborsky is in Europe. Wiikman has been garbage, as has Zaba. There's just not much help for them right now.

EDIT: And again, I forgot we traded Wiikman.

__________________

It's just pain.
nyr2k2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 01:35 PM
  #19
squishy
Registered User
 
squishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
1. Statistically he is running far behind expectations and projections posted here before the season. How has he looked?
He's looked like a 19-year old kid who hasn't quite caught up to the speed of the game being played around him. Sometimes he looks great, other times he looks absolutely clueless.

I won't comment on expectations and projections because I've been saying all season that most people's expectations and projections were ridiculously high.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
2. At a fairly similar point in his career, Anisimov tore up the AHL.
Not true. As a 19-year old AHL rookie Anisimov scored 43 points in 74 games. Hardly tearing up the AHL. You can't compare Anisimov's sophomore numbers -- his point-per-game season -- to Grachev's rookie totals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Is Grachev now considered less of a prospect than Anisimov?
I've always thought Anisimov was a better prospect than Grachev, but that's not a very popular opinion around these parts. Grachev may be bigger, faster, stronger and have a better shot, but Anisimov thinks the game better. You can improve size, strength, speed and shot, you can't teach hockey sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
3. Is it possible that Grachev could end up the next Jessiman, or has he demonstrated more than Jessiman, to date?
Sorry, but the comparison is utterly ridiculous. Grachev was a third round pick, Jessiman was a top-20 first rounder. And regardless of what some might say, the transfer agreement was not the only reason Grachev was picked in the third round. He wasn't a top 10 pick that fell over concerns he wouldn't come over. He was and is a project.

And yes, Grachev has already demonstrated most than Jessiman did. As a 22-year old rookie pro Jessiman couldn't even stick in the AHL, and spent half the season in the ECHL. Grachev hasn't been scoring, but he also hasn't shown signs of not being able to hack it in the AHL.

squishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 01:35 PM
  #20
ogie
Registered User
 
ogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Staten Island
Country: United States
Posts: 1,271
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radek27 View Post
I hate posts like that where all 6 of our D are propsects and we have like one veteran on the whole team in Gaborik. I just chalk those posts up to the kids missing thier NHL 10.
i chalk it up to people realizing that when we draft its not for one team but in reality three. someones gotta play in Hartford and Charlotte.

ogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 02:27 PM
  #21
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 14,155
vCash: 500
I've only seen Grachev on occasions this year but he seems more the power forward type and those kinds of players sometimes take time to max out their potential--it may be he just needs to simplify the strengths in the game. With respect to Kreider--that shiny new toy might also project to be the power forward type but even with all that he is a superior skater to Grachev. In both cases patience is needed.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 02:43 PM
  #22
nyr2k2
Can't Beat Him
 
nyr2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Country: United States
Posts: 24,776
vCash: 50
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by eco's bones View Post
I've only seen Grachev on occasions this year but he seems more the power forward type and those kinds of players sometimes take time to max out their potential--it may be he just needs to simplify the strengths in the game. With respect to Kreider--that shiny new toy might also project to be the power forward type but even with all that he is a superior skater to Grachev. In both cases patience is needed.
Which is a testament to Kreider's skating, considering Grachev is a fine skater in his own right.

Anyway, I thought something like 20-20 would be a good season for Grachev. Now he's obviously not going to hit that, but I bet he'd be much closer if the Pack wasn't altogether awful this season.

If I rated Grachev's season 1-5, 5 being "great," 3 being "fine," then I'd give him a 3.

nyr2k2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 03:09 PM
  #23
SupersonicMonkey*
DROP THE PUCK
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 16,230
vCash: 500
Stepan is a shiny new toy?

News flash: Stepan was drafted BEFORE Grachev. 2nd round, same year.

And Kreider's development is at a better rate. He isn't playing against 16-17 year old kids in his first year after being drafted like Grachev was.

Also, its such a pointless comment "shiny new toy" these guys are all Rangers prospects.

No body forgot about Grachev, he just hasn't had a fantastic season. He's going through a learning process.

SupersonicMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 03:21 PM
  #24
ogie
Registered User
 
ogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Staten Island
Country: United States
Posts: 1,271
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SupersonicMonkey View Post
Stepan is a shiny new toy?
yes people didn't really know what we had in him until the WJ championship and we saw him compete with top Canadian super prospects. It's not a new toy until you get to see it in action.

ogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-16-2010, 03:43 PM
  #25
hlundqvist30*
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,520
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SupersonicMonkey View Post
Stepan is a shiny new toy?

News flash: Stepan was drafted BEFORE Grachev. 2nd round, same year.

And Kreider's development is at a better rate. He isn't playing against 16-17 year old kids in his first year after being drafted like Grachev was.

Also, its such a pointless comment "shiny new toy" these guys are all Rangers prospects.

No body forgot about Grachev, he just hasn't had a fantastic season. He's going through a learning process.
But Stepan didn't really break out of his shell until this year at the WJC. It's not so much the shiny new toy as it is "what have you done for me lately." Grachev will be fine.

hlundqvist30* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.